Jump to content

Maybe we can pull off the Reverse-Julio move?


Recommended Posts

It's common practice these days to remove any affiliations with the team to increase leverage and remove any bias during contract negotiations. Players and agents that do so are saying they want to get paid and are not tied down to a team.

Lots of players do this and most are instructed by their agent to do so. Deebo did the same thing last year and resigned with the 49ers. 

He's not going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, The Don™ said:

It's common practice these days to remove any affiliations with the team to increase leverage and remove any bias during contract negotiations. Players and agents that do so are saying they want to get paid and are not tied down to a team.

Lots of players do this and most are instructed by their agent to do so. Deebo did the same thing last year and resigned with the 49ers. 

He's not going anywhere.

May be true, but AJ Brown was traded just 9 days after doing the exact same thing, to the exact same organization, just last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Don™ said:

It's common practice these days to remove any affiliations with the team to increase leverage and remove any bias during contract negotiations. Players and agents that do so are saying they want to get paid and are not tied down to a team.

Lots of players do this and most are instructed by their agent to do so. Deebo did the same thing last year and resigned with the 49ers. 

He's not going anywhere.

Hey Don. Trust me, the brass doesn’t give two ****z about someone’s social media profile. Nor does it have even a morsel of impact on a negotiation.

It simply boils down to whether a team is willing to meet your compensation demands. Internally, they will weigh out the value proposition and decide if a player is worth it to them. Same with the player & his agent.

If both parties can agree on a range, then negotiations ensue, if not, then they begin that same process with other teams.

The only thing that may change things would be the two types of franchise tags. Which I think will happen regarding the Ravens & LJ.

It only takes one team to open that bank vault. Even then, there’s an element of risk associated with that sort of commitment to one player. 

So, to get back to your valid point about a player removing his team affiliation via social media in order not to show attachment or to show neutrality, it’s really nothing more than triviality of no consequence. Because the only place the rubber will meet the road is at the negotiating table. 

You can bet that both parties will not be concerned about the other’s SM. But I can potentially see a legal problem should either party use these SM platforms to falsify or divulge information that by law should otherwise remain private. Or use those platforms for character assassination. By then however, it’s clear the parties have pretty much gone their separate ways lol.

Would you agree? I mean that’s simplistic. Now I’m obviously not an an attorney as are a few here, but I did stay at a holiday inn express last night! 😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Dirtybird56 said:

Titans are in a pretty tough spot with their roster if I remember correctly.. I’m sure Simmons is their top priority but maybe the situation they’re in could allow us to finesse him 

 

From USAToday:

When it comes to Tennessee Titans players due for contract extensions, the biggest of the group is no doubt defensive lineman Jeffery Simmons, who will play on the fifth-year option in 2023 before hitting free agency in 2024.

The expectation has been that the Titans would get something done well before it gets to that point, but the team’s tight salary cap situation might prevent that, and quite possibly a long-term extension altogether.

And that’s exactly what the Titans have told Simmons, who revealed to The Athletic’s Dan Pompei the conversation he had with the team about an extension this past offseason.

Simmons says the Titans told him they don’t know when they can pay him, and they may not be able to pay him what he thinks he’s worth, which is likely to be around the $31.6 million per year Aaron Donald is getting.

...

But Tennessee’s salary cap situation is a mess, with the Titans having just $2 million in cap space now, which likely hindered their ability to make a trade, and they are set to be over the cap in 2023, per Over the Cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 1989Fan said:

1. Heck yeah I’d take Simmons

2. it’s comical to me how the younger generation players think these social media tactics matter at all to a bunch of wealthy boomers or gen x’ers.

I mean it usually works doesn’t it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 1989Fan said:

1. Heck yeah I’d take Simmons

2. it’s comical to me how the younger generation players think these social media tactics matter at all to a bunch of wealthy boomers or gen x’ers.

Lol it kinda does.. in this generation it’s a sign that the player wants to be moved therefore it takes away any leverage the team may have With potential suitors because they already know the player either won’t play or is going to be an issue for his current organization.

It take the negotiation from moving an asset to ..we’re taking on your problem so really we shouldn’t have to give you much in a trade. It’s all relative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...