Jump to content

QB’s, Pass Rushers & Cap space - O-Line!


Recommended Posts

QB - I’m not “all in” on Ridder, but I’m definitely not “all in” on trading away picks and players for a “superstar.”  I think AS has built (or is building) an offense that is a run first punishing offense.  Superstar QB, not required, allowing talent to be added across the roster.  I loved JJ, but that draft hurt us down the road.  With how our Rush game evolved, I’m for letting Ridder show what he can do and add talent. 

Pass Rushers - I’m not sure how we could miss so badly on so many pass rushers via the draft and FA, but I hope we can get some hits.  It’s been a long time since John Abraham (The Predator) was here.  
 

Cap Space - realistically, how many staters could we sign?  I know the contract doesn’t count 100% year 1.  Are we looking at signing  4-6 top players who count on the cap at about $10MM/year? Honest question, looking for input here, assuming we don’t spend it all on one player. 
 

O-Line - I would really like is to get a solid center and left guard. When I watch the games, I see these guys getting getting abused on pass blocking.  What would a solid center and guard cost in FA?  
 

thx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s see what Ridder can do. He got better each game and we all know Falcons would have made the playoffs if Ridder was named starter after week 10. 
Not loving any FA quarterbacks anyway. Jackson is great but he’d take away our ability to pay defenders and objectively after 5 seasons he’s never played a full schedule. Love him but he’s not going to last 2 years at the outside.  
 

We definitely need pass rush. That’s one of those areas where you just have to look at Power 5 starters. We can’t invest a season in their growth, we need someone who can reach now. No FCS project linebackers, please. 
 

and I hate to say it but we do need to look at a center. Dalman just snaps too wild. His block is good though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Falcons have a foundation on offense except for 1 more receiver. 

Time to get the defense there as well. Probably won't be many, if any splash signing in FA , because they just wont hit the market. Expect solid guys. Not superstars. But none the less, foundational pieces. 

I get wanting upgrades on the OL, but that comes at a price. Whether its $ or picks, you still gotta pay. The OL was solid and dominant at times running the ball. 

Regardless, TF and AS need to at least get the defense more help. Period. It's time the Falcons flip the script on dumping numerous resources into the offense and making bad choices on defense. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Killing Floor said:

Let’s see what Ridder can do. He got better each game and we all know Falcons would have made the playoffs if Ridder was named starter after week 10. 
Not loving any FA quarterbacks anyway. Jackson is great but he’d take away our ability to pay defenders and objectively after 5 seasons he’s never played a full schedule. Love him but he’s not going to last 2 years at the outside.  
 

We definitely need pass rush. That’s one of those areas where you just have to look at Power 5 starters. We can’t invest a season in their growth, we need someone who can reach now. No FCS project linebackers, please. 
 

and I hate to say it but we do need to look at a center. Dalman just snaps too wild. His block is good though. 

They may look at Center, but Dalman will get another year. He wasn't the main issue on offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Swayzee said:

Like Watson😎.

I'm hard pressed to believe that Blank was not the driving factor in that move. 

But if TF was, it was a slick way to tell Matt he wasn't the guy anymore, let him pick where he wanted to go, and fleece that team for a pick. All the while dumping cap and eating dead money when the team ripped the band aid off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sui_Generis said:

I'm hard pressed to believe that Blank was not the driving factor in that move. 

But if TF was, it was a slick way to tell Matt he wasn't the guy anymore, let him pick where he wanted to go, and fleece that team for a pick. All the while dumping cap and eating dead money when the team ripped the band aid off.

It had to be done, I don’t care who’s choice it was 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Sui_Generis said:

I'm hard pressed to believe that Blank was not the driving factor in that move. 

But if TF was, it was a slick way to tell Matt he wasn't the guy anymore, let him pick where he wanted to go, and fleece that team for a pick. All the while dumping cap and eating dead money when the team ripped the band aid off.

TF is a genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the make or break year for this regime.

TF and co have been good cleaning up the cap mess.

But this is there year they can’t miss with picks or FAs without them and the team is still below average to middling it’s game over for them in my eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kaptain Krazy said:

Maybe 3 Free Agent signings, 4 tops. They have to think about McGary,  AJT, and Lindstrom (although the latter may be structured in a way that saves cap space).

Every level of the Defense needs improvement, and the DL needs drafted help AND free agent help.

 

What do you mean by the bolded portion of your post? Are you saying that Lindstrom is going to take a team friendly deal? Did you read something somewhere indicating that'd be the case? Just curious if that's what you meant and what you based it on.

To my mind, he's about to be one of the highest paid guards in the NFL, but I'm 100% speculating. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bunchy Carter said:

What do you mean by the bolded portion of your post? Are you saying that Lindstrom is going to take a team friendly deal? Did you read something somewhere indicating that'd be the case? Just curious if that's what you meant and what you based it on.

To my mind, he's about to be one of the highest paid guards in the NFL, but I'm 100% speculating. 

More of how the money would be spread out rather than the total. Agree with the idea that he deserves to be be paid, as he's been almost Fralic-like in his performance for the Falcons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Flyin' In DC said:

Do they get "solid" FA's at each level of D? Maybe a better DT and an Edge? LB and corner? Or do they build mostly from the lines outward? 

It should be a lot of fun seeing what AS/TF do with room to play

As long as AS/TF is not handcuffed by making the Jackson move, that would be more influenced by Blank than themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, richardc said:

 I loved JJ, but that draft hurt us down the road.

Making a Qualifying statement about JJ means you are saying the JJ trade hurt us. 

Incorrect and flat out myopic. JJ helped us play in 2 NFCCG in 5 years with a SB appearance and had been hailed a sure HOF player. What "hurt us" was all the other picks we made which were horrible. Had nothing to do with JJ or the trade. Had Andrew Jackson, Akeem Dent, Peter Konz, L Holmes, M Goodman, S Maponga, Hageman, Shembo, Southward and any other draft pick "down that road" even been an average NFL starter, the Mike Smith ERA would have looked different via drafting. Instead, these draftees were either never starters or never should have been starters. Just terrible.

TD stunk and stunk bad. JJ was one of the few we got right and the trade had nothing to do with "hurting us".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...