Jump to content

I want to resign McGary


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, ShmevinShmarris said:

4 years $36M

Frontload the contract so we can cut ties in season 3 or 4 if we find an upgrade

He’s gonna want and get more than that most likely.  My guess is he’ll be looking for around 12-13 million a year and I think we could franchise him for 15.  I’d franchise him if it were me and see if he has another good season before giving him a long term contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CraigSmackDaddy said:

He’s gonna want and get more than that most likely.  My guess is he’ll be looking for around 12-13 million a year and I think we could franchise him for 15.  I’d franchise him if it were me and see if he has another good season before giving him a long term contract.

Per former NFL & NBA agent/current CBS Sports writer & cap expert, Joel Corry...

Here are the projected non-exclusive franchise tag amounts for 2023:
Quarterback: $32.45MM
Running back: $10.1MM
Wide receiver: $19.76MM
Tight end: $11.36MM
Offensive line: $18.26MM
Defensive end: $19.74MM
Defensive tackle: $18.95MM
Linebacker: $20.95MM
Cornerback: $18.16MM
Safety: $14.47MM
Kicker/punter: $5.39MM

These aren't set in stone, but Corry should have a pretty good idea of what to expect, so it may be more than $15M to tag McGary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that resigning McGary to a long term deal would hurt the team moving forward..... Let me explain. Jake Matthews cap hit next year will be $33 Million dollars so were basically locked on to Matthews until 2024 on top of that we desperately need to extend/resign Lindstrom next year!! I would much rather let McGary walk and focus on giving Lindstrom whatever money he will demand next year, and we all know he will probably be the highest paid O-Line player next year! Putting McGary on the franchise tag could be a good option but the Jags put a franchise tag on Cam Robinson last year for $16 Million and that number is probably going even higher this year. If you franchise tag him it would basically be just kicking the can down the road next year and having the same thing happen with having to resign him, what makes that bad is Lindstrom will need a new contract next year as well. I agree that McGary is having a wonderful year this year but is resigning him worth potentially losing Lindstrom??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, k-train said:

Per former NFL & NBA agent/current CBS Sports writer & cap expert, Joel Corry...

Here are the projected non-exclusive franchise tag amounts for 2023:
Quarterback: $32.45MM
Running back: $10.1MM
Wide receiver: $19.76MM
Tight end: $11.36MM
Offensive line: $18.26MM
Defensive end: $19.74MM
Defensive tackle: $18.95MM
Linebacker: $20.95MM
Cornerback: $18.16MM
Safety: $14.47MM
Kicker/punter: $5.39MM

These aren't set in stone, but Corry should have a pretty good idea of what to expect, so it may be more than $15M to tag McGary.

There is no way I would tag Mcgary at 18.25M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aluminafalcon said:

Price determines everything. Without knowing market I think 7-10 million a year for 3 years is fair. That’s similar to what gage got last year and I would rate mcgary contributions this year similarly to gages last year

I respect what everyone is saying in regards to maintaining continuity in the OL.  However, McGary's play for 4 years overall is not all that great. Therefore, if the Falcons resign him, I am on the @Aluminafalcon and @ShmevinShmarris bandwagon in giving McGary no more than $10M a year. Right now, the Falcons has to sign about 13 free agents and be under the salary cap. Spotrac is currently predicting the Falcons having short of $69M in cap space. Not sure if it would be a good idea to use $15M-$18M of your cap space for an overall average-at-best Right Tackle.  With HC Arthur Smith stating the team's highest priority if upgrading the pass rush, along with GM Terry Fontenot stating a while back that he is not breaking the bank chasing free agents, I just wonder how the Falcons will address the off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FentayeJones said:

There is no way I would tag Mcgary at 18.25M.

No kidding. Yes he has been elite run blocking but he still is below average pass protection. I just don’t see a rt that has difficulty pass blocking being a big commodity. He is really only attractive to a team that plans to throw less than 30 times a game. So San Fran, bears ,us maybe browns?  Anyways point is the list isn’t long and I don’t think any of them will over pay for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ShmevinShmarris said:

4 years $36M

Frontload the contract so we can cut ties in season 3 or 4 if we find an upgrade

Zero chance he takes that offer. None.

If he does, I'm sending you a gift basket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Butudontseeme™ said:

Saw McGary leaving the Benz the other day after the game. Looked like he had Lindstrom with him too and another guy in the backseat. I’d say that guy has built a strong bond with his unit mates. 

That's one of the reasons I believe AS and TF will spend what they need to spend to keep McGary with the team. It takes time to get that tight bond established, but it's worth a little dip in individual blocking strengths to keep that together.

McGary's pass blocking is improving and you rarely have to hold your  blocks for long in Smith's scheme the few times you do pass.

It might pinch some to pay McGary and Lindstrom both this off-season, but the alternative is a hole at RG that will have to be filled by somebody. That new person will probably be pricey and won't have the rapport with the other guys on our OL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, FentayeJones said:

There is no way I would tag Mcgary at 18.25M.

Not sure I would either, but it certainly is better than a long term deal and he winds up sucking.

Really depends on if they like him, but I certainly hear what you are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FentayeJones said:

I wouldn't have a problem extending Kaleb as long as it's not one of those backloaded Dimitroff extensions that's hard to get out of.

3 year deal most of the money up front, maybe a team option for the third year. Similar to Grady's deal. It's all about the structure. 

Yeah even Grady's extension at the beginning of the year was a 3 yr 50 million deal that we can get out of in 2024 with little cap ramifications. Even his was basically a two year deal.

I can see a similarly structured deal for McGary. Win win for both parties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FentayeJones said:

There is no way I would tag Mcgary at 18.25M.

Yeah and when Mayfield or some other hobo is whiffing all game and ruining the game in place of McGary you will be complaining. But hey we saved a few dollars. 

Tag him all day long if they cannot come to a fair 3-4 year deal around 12-15m annually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PokerSteve said:

That's one of the reasons I believe AS and TF will spend what they need to spend to keep McGary with the team. It takes time to get that tight bond established, but it's worth a little dip in individual blocking strengths to keep that together.

McGary's pass blocking is improving and you rarely have to hold your  blocks for long in Smith's scheme the few times you do pass.

It might pinch some to pay McGary and Lindstrom both this off-season, but the alternative is a hole at RG that will have to be filled by somebody. That new person will probably be pricey and won't have the rapport with the other guys on our OL. 

I think that chemistry is often dismissed on o line but we hear over and over from players and coaches how important it is. On top of that, McGary is a top shelf run blocker and that should be the identity period. You have an emerging star at RB and your o line is playing at a high level in the run game. Don’t need to mess that up. 
 

run game, and defense. Hitting in Ridder would be awesome but smash mouth football is much more sustainable than praying you hit on a superstar QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Atlantafan21 said:

The most likely scenario is probably a franchise tag to see if he can do it again.

It's hard to see a franchise tag... That's around 18.2 mil for the year.... Normally that number or more is the guys new number for his new contract

 

example ... Cam Robinson was franchised (16.6 mil) but his contract extension was for 3 year for 54 mil (18 mil a year) ...

David Njoku was franchised (10.9 mil) but his extension 4 year for 56 mil (14 mil a year)

 

I think we try our hardest to resign him but I would low-key be shocked if we franchise tag him ... Transitional may be an option but I think we try to have him signed before FA

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PriMeTiiMe said:

Yeah and when Mayfield or some other hobo is whiffing all game and ruining the game in place of McGary you will be complaining. But hey we saved a few dollars. 

Tag him all day long if they cannot come to a fair 3-4 year deal around 12-15m annually.

If you are willing to give McGary almost 20M guaranteed next season on a franchise tag then you are a fool. That's 1/4th of the teams cap space next year dedicated to one average player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I wish McGary was better in pass protection, he has done his job in the run game. Continuity of an offensive line is huge. I would hate to let him go then lose that. 

Our run game is top of the NFL. If he walks, you have to replace him with a free agent or fairly high draft pick.  There is no guarantee that whomever you bring in will be an upgrade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FentayeJones said:

If you are willing to give McGary almost 20M guaranteed next season on a franchise tag then you are a fool. That's 1/4th of the teams cap space next year dedicated to one average player. 

Extending Lindstrom and cutting Mariota will clear 17.5m

so for 1m out of our cap space we currently are set to have I keep my line together another season and allow McGary to prove his good season this year was not a fluke.

you’re right though. Let’s roll the dice and pray whoever fills in is good. What could go wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 1989Fan said:

Thankfully McGary doesn’t have back & knee injury issues like Baker did (dating back to his USC days). McGary also doesn’t have 32 1/2” arms. We can argue is he a good enough pass blocker to get a nice deal, but his issues are different than Bakers.

edit: his arms aren’t really much longer so never mind that…thanks GTech1

 

Not really. Most FA rankings have McGary right up there with Conklin actually. (Which surprised me)

doesn't he have a heart condition thingy though???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...