Jump to content

Braves at Dodgers


For the A

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Unknøwn said:

Smit did say he was encouraged by Ynoa. Said he just ran out of gas but they'll continue to stretch him out. 

Since Ynoa's dumb wall punching move, his ERA is 6.11. He's still trying to get back to what he was before. 

He "ran out of gas" because he can't throw strikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Malachore said:

It was a bad idea to even have him on the roster. He's not going to be anything that we haven't seen the last 4 years.

I'm just glad an Atlanta journalist finally called him out on his terrible bullpen management. Expectations are going to be higher this year and they've played well below them. I don't care that it's only the 2nd week, they likely win last night if Newk wasn't in there.

The problem is that Trea Turner kills the Braves.... regardless of who is pitching.

And in Freddie's at bat...pitch one was strike...so much that they had the count 0-1 on the TV.

And there was another pitch that was a ball but it was a strike for the dodger pitchers all night.

It was annoying and frustrating but it is unfair to say that Newk is why the Braves lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

I mean Snit has a point.

It is the 4th inning ....Newk is one of the few guys in the pen that can (theoretically at least) give you several ( 2 or 3) innings.

That is what he was counting on.

 

He shouldn't have been brought in with 2 on to face Freeman. Game was still in reach, he looked at the inning and not the situation. Ypu bring in literally any of the 5 backend guys there and roll the dice on Newk in the 5th and 6th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

The problem is that Trea Turner kills the Braves.... regardless of who is pitching.

And in Freddie's at bat...pitch one was strike...so much that they had the count 0-1 on the TV.

And there was another pitch that was a ball but it was a strike for the dodger pitchers all night.

It was annoying and frustrating but it is unfair to say that Newk is why the Braves lost.

Yeah he isn't the only reason, Snit and Ynoa played a large part in it but like I said in the post above. You use any of your backend 5, even Minter/O'Day there and try Newk in the 5th and 6th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

I mean Snit has a point.

It is the 4th inning ....Newk is one of the few guys in the pen that can (theoretically at least) give you several ( 2 or 3) innings.

That is what he was counting on.

 

The argument is it doesn't matter what inning it is. If you feel the game is in jeopardy thats your high leverage inning. I mean you have such a deep pen you could have used O'Day for example and been fine. The point theyre making is that Newk is the mopup guy. He's the one you put in to eat innings when it's 10-0. Not to keep it close. The whole world knows at some point this year Newk will be DFA'd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

I mean Snit has a point.

It is the 4th inning ....Newk is one of the few guys in the pen that can (theoretically at least) give you several ( 2 or 3) innings.

That is what he was counting on.

 

So you bring in Minter to get out of the inning -- it's still only 3-0 at that point -- and if you have to pitch Newcomb give him clean bases to start with. Maybe then he can go 2 innings and the Braves get to a 4-3 lead.

Sometimes you have to realize that the biggest inning may be the 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, K26dp said:

So you bring in Minter to get out of the inning -- it's still only 3-0 at that point -- and if you have to pitch Newcomb give him clean bases to start with. Maybe then he can go 2 innings and the Braves get to a 4-3 lead.

Sometimes you have to realize that the biggest inning may be the 4th.

Completely agreed. That move was puzzling but if I have to play Snitker's advocate, I'm guessing he wants to test Newcomb's mettle by throwing him in a tough situation to see what he can do. At some point we can't "coddle" him by saving him for new innings... or at least that's what I'm thinking that Snitker was gunning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ATLBham said:

Completely agreed. That move was puzzling but if I have to play Snitker's advocate, I'm guessing he wants to test Newcomb's mettle by throwing him in a tough situation to see what he can do. At some point we can't "coddle" him by saving him for new innings... or at least that's what I'm thinking that Snitker was gunning. 

If Snit doesn't already know Newk then no one does. It's been the same thing for parts of 4 years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, K26dp said:

So you bring in Minter to get out of the inning -- it's still only 3-0 at that point -- and if you have to pitch Newcomb give him clean bases to start with. Maybe then he can go 2 innings and the Braves get to a 4-3 lead.

Sometimes you have to realize that the biggest inning may be the 4th.

 

33 minutes ago, Unknøwn said:

The argument is it doesn't matter what inning it is. If you feel the game is in jeopardy thats your high leverage inning. I mean you have such a deep pen you could have used O'Day for example and been fine. The point theyre making is that Newk is the mopup guy. He's the one you put in to eat innings when it's 10-0. Not to keep it close. The whole world knows at some point this year Newk will be DFA'd. 

 

39 minutes ago, Malachore said:

Yeah he isn't the only reason, Snit and Ynoa played a large part in it but like I said in the post above. You use any of your backend 5, even Minter/O'Day there and try Newk in the 5th and 6th. 

I understand all of that  and I don't totally necessarily disagree but if Snit does bring one of those others guys in and they are off and the dodgers score or if they get out of it then but face a similar situation later in the game but those bullets are already spent then the complaint becomes that he used up his guys too early.

At the end of the day anybody who's in the pen needs to be able to handle high leverage situations....Newk used to be one of those guys but at this point he is not.... And I'm not sure that he'll be able to get back to where he was in being one of those guys.

I'd rather this happen in April then in September.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

I understand all of that  and I don't totally necessarily disagree but if Snit does bring one of those others guys in and they are off and the dodgers score or if they get out of it then but face a similar situation later in the game but those bullets are already spent then the complaint becomes that he used up his guys too early.

Yes, if the Dodgers score and a comeback becomes more unlikely, then you can use your mop-up guys like Newcomb, Thornberg, and Stephens to finish out the game. There's 11 relievers on the team, and only Spencer Strider was unavailable. I will NEVER complain if a manager uses a good reliever in a bid to keep the game from getting out of hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, K26dp said:

Yes, if the Dodgers score and a comeback becomes more unlikely, then you can use your mop-up guys like Newcomb, Thornberg, and Stephens to finish out the game. There's 11 relievers on the team, and only Spencer Strider was unavailable. I will NEVER complain if a manager uses a good reliever in a bid to keep the game from getting out of hand. 

Exactly. You only use Sean if you think you can't win the game. Down by 3 or so is within reach. 

As far as the offense goes, Ozuna is doing good but I wonder if his situation and chemistry creat some sort of uncomfortable clubhouse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, vietlanta said:

Exactly. You only use Sean if you think you can't win the game. Down by 3 or so is within reach. 

As far as the offense goes, Ozuna is doing good but I wonder if his situation and chemistry creat some sort of uncomfortable clubhouse

I believe AA said that the Dominican players wanted him back. The 2 likely ones who didn't jumped to LA and the other is garbage anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, vietlanta said:

Exactly. You only use Sean if you think you can't win the game. Down by 3 or so is within reach. 

As far as the offense goes, Ozuna is doing good but I wonder if his situation and chemistry creat some sort of uncomfortable clubhouse

I talked about this a couple of months ago but most of these latino players grew up in places where domestic violence is "normal" not condoning it but it's not something they are going to see as a big deal or through American eyes. To them he paid his penalty, made his apologies, and that's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vietlanta said:

Exactly. You only use Sean if you think you can't win the game. Down by 3 or so is within reach. 

As far as the offense goes, Ozuna is doing good but I wonder if his situation and chemistry creat some sort of uncomfortable clubhouse

AA made it clear Ozuna is here cause the players asked for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, falconsd56 said:

I think Dansby needs to sit a day. He is pressing too much and has reverted back to not being able to hit the breaking ball.

Who do we play for Dansby? This is when I wish we would had Camargo, not that he wasn't a get hitter, but he was a great infielder. This would give us a great option at SS and give Dansby a minute to figure out what he is seeing at the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...