Jump to content

Braves @ Cardinals


For the A

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, AUTiger7222 said:

 Instead of disputing all the valid stats I've posted you just call me wrong and then when I don't just "drop it" you question my maturity.

Also, I questioned your maturity over your declaration that "seeing everyone act so gitty [sic] about him just pisses me off", not be because you haven't dropped this discussion. 

That other people like a player you don't has zero impact on your or the team and its World Series chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, K26dp said:

The stats you quoted don't back up your opinion. The stats indicate he's about a league-average hitter, not "one of the worst hitters in baseball". It's not the stats that are wrong, it's simply you. 

Would he be better if he got on base more? Of course. He would also be better if he hit more home runs, or more doubles, or stole bases, or played Gold Glove caliber centerfield. He doesn't. But that doesn't mean he's useless.

And you are right that he likely wouldn't start for a World Series team. As you have repeatedly pointed out over the last several months, the Braves aren't a World Series team.

Him being one of the worst hitters in baseball isn't the issue here or not. We just have different opinions about what it means to be one of the worst hitters in baseball. IMO he's not one of the worst hitters in baseball because things like his wRC+ is just slightly below league average but it's close enough for you that he's not. IMO he is because league average is horrible IMO, especially with an OBP as low as his. This is just a matter of us having different opinions on what it means to be be one of the worst hitters in baseball. That doesn't make me right or wrong or make you right or wrong. It's a different level of assessment and standard and that's fine. There's nothing wrong with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AUTiger7222 said:

Him being one of the worst hitters in baseball isn't the issue here or not.

It is literally what we've been arguing about.

 

3 minutes ago, AUTiger7222 said:

We just have different opinions about what it means to be one of the worst hitters in baseball.

What's great about statistics is that they make opinions irrelevant. Someone or something who is "average" cannot be "one of the worst", unless your definition of the latter is so expansive as to make quantitative analysis utterly meaningless.

 

5 minutes ago, AUTiger7222 said:

IMO he's not one of the worst hitters in baseball because things like his wRC+ is just slightly below league average but it's close enough for you that he's not. IMO he is because league average is horrible IMO, especially with an OBP as low as his.

I'm going to guess this made sense to you. I'm also going to guess that it makes sense to no one else. 

 

6 minutes ago, AUTiger7222 said:

This is just a matter of us having different opinions on what it means to be be one of the worst hitters in baseball. That doesn't make me right or wrong or make you right or wrong. It's a different level of assessment and standard and that's fine. There's nothing wrong with that.

Reality doesn't care about your opinions. You're simply wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AUTiger7222 said:

Nope. Player A gets on base more and therefore if he's on base more naturally he's gonna score more than Player B. The more runners you get on base the more runs you score. It's the Moneyball approach. It's that simple.

If he’s batting seventh in front of Kevan Smith and the pitching spot he won’t score as much as you think, especially if he’s on base via walk or single. Man you are one salty dude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, K26dp said:

It is literally what we've been arguing about.

 

What's great about statistics is that they make opinions irrelevant. Someone or something who is "average" cannot be "one of the worst", unless your definition of the latter is so expansive as to make quantitative analysis utterly meaningless.

 

I'm going to guess this made sense to you. I'm also going to guess that it makes sense to no one else. 

 

Reality doesn't care about your opinions. You're simply wrong. 

Depends on which stats you use to evaluate players.

wRC+ = Adam Duvall = League Average = This is where you stand

OBP = Adam Duvall = One of the worst hitters in baseball = This is where I stand

 

 

But we've gone around in this circle enough times and I'm tired of you calling me wrong because I use a different stat than you do to evaluate a hitter and we're never going to see eye-to-eye on this. This has gone way past rational discussion and has just become silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Adam Duvall said:

If he’s batting seventh in front of Kevan Smith and the pitching spot he won’t score as much as you think, especially if he’s on base via walk or single. Man you are one salty dude

If a guy with a .350 OBP is hitting 7th the manager is a dumb***. The Braves only have 3 hitters (Freeman, Acuna, Riley) with an OBP above .350 and since Acuna is hurt that would put the guy with a .350 OBP as the 3rd best mark on the team among active players. So if he's hitting 7th the manager should be fired for being a dumb***.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AUTiger7222 said:

 

BTW, I agree with you. Just find DOB's response here to be extremely weird.

He is just pointing out that the grass is not always greener.

And he is right...it is not but I just think given how Smyly has pitched over the last month or so he be more of an asset all depend then what he would be as a starter.

He is usually good for three or four innings... And there are times that he is lights out in those innings.

But with Muller,Fried, Anderson, Morton, and Touki ( assuming he bounces back from his rough start) then Smyly's best use is in the pen IMO same with Ynoa.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

He is just pointing out that the grass is not always greener.

And he is right...it is not but I just think given how Smyly has pitched over the last month or so he be more of an asset all depend then what he would be as a starter.

He is usually good for three or four innings... And there are times that he is lights out in those innings.

But with Muller,Fried, Anderson, Morton, and Touki ( assuming he bounces back from his rough start) then Smyly's best use is in the pen IMO same with Ynoa.

I think his reasoning is off though. Basically he's saying Ynoa can't come back and do well cause he missed too much time so we should stick with Smyly. That's a bad reason IMO. Smyly is better served for the bullpen given that he can't make it through the lineup 3 times without getting absolutely rocked that 3rd time too and a starter that's only capable of 4 or 5 good innings every time out puts a strain on the pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...