ike barn87987 1,774 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 minute ago, SLEVEN said: Smith has already interviewed twice Did you not see that I said that last night? Before the news that he had a second interview. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Atl Falcon 4,157 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 3 minutes ago, DonOfThemBirds said: Columbus? Christopher Columbus Quote Link to post Share on other sites
booty-mane 96 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, Atl Falcon said: Brady comes with high risk but honestly who doesn’t if they’ve never been an NFL HC before. Columbus took a chance and see what happened? The earth’s not flat lol lets take some ******* risk. we went safe for the last three years and got nothing to show. Hiring Dirk was the safest ******* choice we could make. **** that ****. Go big or go home baby. We got Matty Ice and JJ for at least another year. Lets ******* plunge into the deep end mtldirtybird and Atl Falcon 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus 26,732 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Apparently Watson is complaining until they interview Bienemy. Ergo Proxy and Rings 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DonOfThemBirds 19,265 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, Atl Falcon said: Christopher Columbus Oh lol I was thinking about possibly someone in the NFL named Columbus. Wasn't thinking about the explorer. Atl Falcon 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SLEVEN 460 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 11 minutes ago, ike barn87987 said: Did you not see that I said that last night? Before the news that he had a second interview. I didn’t. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Atl Falcon 4,157 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 3 minutes ago, Jesus said: Apparently Watson is complaining until they interview Bienemy. I like Watson but he needs to Shut up and play. He’s being paid 40m per yr. Bless his little heart they didn’t ask him if they could hire Caserio. Watsons a dem QB and not a owner GM or Lebron James and certainly not a legacy in Houston yet. As the GOAT BB would say - do your dem job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ergo Proxy 26,135 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 20 minutes ago, Atl Falcon said: Brady comes with high risk but honestly who doesn’t if they’ve never been an NFL HC before. Columbus took a chance and see what happened? The earth’s not flat lol I'm just saying, he is green even for OC. McVay was young but had a lot more experience as a coordinator. If he is a genius? Take a chance. McVay has shown to be a leader. But is Brady able to be both genius and leader as the HC needs to be? You can show out in college...but that isn't the same. We know this. He had a great year with LSU..just short-track record. Atl Falcon and Rings 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JBridgez 294 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Arthur Smith is our man. Draft Najee Harris and he’ll be able to run his same system Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ergo Proxy 26,135 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 16 minutes ago, Atl Falcon said: If you go Smith you bout gotta go Najee or another RB early in the draft We need a RB by round 3 this year period. Or sign a low-mileage vet. Both? That's beyond the question. It's about lining up a run scheme with our current/future shaped OL. Najee is a luxury. We aren't tied to him with any coach. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Friendly Folk 1,511 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 If it’s Brady we may as well have kept Quinn. He is just another Adam Gase. You’ll see. I wanted Daboll. I am heartbroken Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Atl Falcon 4,157 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 minute ago, Ergo Proxy said: I'm just saying, he is green even for OC. McVay was young but had a lot more experience as a coordinator. If he is a genius? Take a chance. But is he really? You can show out in college...but that isn't the same. We know this. I understand but I’d be terrible disappointed if he turned out to be great one. No better guarantees with A Smith or Hackett. If Brady has the leadership qualities and Blank and McVay know it I’d hire him. EBs a great leader but not a Joe Brady in terms of the new offensive innovations that many rave about. My only question with Brady is leadership. He’s a red head and probably has that piss and vinegar temperament that HCs need to lead a group of men. IDK Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GATXBOI 2,020 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I think the Rams beat Green Bay. So we could hire Hackett Monday. Loser of NFC championship becomes GM. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PointSwayzee 835 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 34 minutes ago, DonOfThemBirds said: If the Falcons don't go QB in the 1st in this draft, doesn't mean the new HC's wagon is hitched to Ryan long term. Agreed. I think it would be a terrible mistake if Field or Wilson(personally think Wilson is the best in class) is there and we pass for a Parsons or Surtain but that is my personal opinion. Atl Falcon 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Atl Falcon 4,157 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 5 minutes ago, Ergo Proxy said: We need a RB by round 3 this year period. Or sign a low-mileage vet. Both? That's beyond the question. It's about lining up a run scheme with our current/future shaped OL. Najee is a luxury. We aren't tied to him with any coach. I hope so....no doubt it would help the running game 3 minutes ago, GATXBOI said: I think the Rams beat Green Bay. So we could hire Hackett Monday. Loser of NFC championship becomes GM. TUFF TASK in the GB freeze but defense might determine this one.I have a sneaky feeling the Rams will win or at least cover the 7 pts Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sidecar Falcon 8,338 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, Falcons Fan MVP said: Which of these 3 do you think would be able to get the most out of Matt Ryan and maximize his talents? Smith. Just is still out on Hackett and Brady. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Atl Falcon 4,157 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 4 minutes ago, PointSwayzee said: Agreed. I think it would be a terrible mistake if Field or Wilson(personally think Wilson is the best in class) is there and we pass for a Parsons or Surtain but that is my personal opinion. Dude if that happens I’m going to stand on a cliff. I think Wilson will be the better of the two and I’d almost bet a Bennie that he ends up going before Fields PointSwayzee 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shock 2,291 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I’d take Brady or Hackett over Smith. But I’m just good with an offensive guy at this point. Atl Falcon 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
niels petersen 330 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) It's tough. I think all of them are great OCs, But the question is if they'll be great HCs and who will be able to turn the culture around here? I'll take the gamble on Brady, in order to sustain a certain scheme for the next few years, and hope he'll surround himself with experienced coaches. Arthur Smith is second, because I believe he had the skills to field a solid and conmpetetive team, but I'm not sure he is much more than and offensive minded DQ. Hackett is third for me. Good experience but I see nothing special in teams of HC qualities. His sucess in GB may also - in large part been - be due to LaFleur. I'll gamble on Brady as HC so we'll take a new direction. Go for Rick Smith as GM in order to ensure that the organization makes a turn around regarding our culture. I think the pairing of Brady and Smith is the best way to move on from the DQ/Dimi culture and style, which we really need. Edited January 14 by niels petersen Spelling Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDaveG 43,826 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 11 hours ago, Ovie_Lover said: I don’t see what anyone sees in Brady he’s meh. Will be meh and will flounder as a HC. He might be a great HC 5-10 years from now. But he's green as a seasick frog right now. Ovie_Lover 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDaveG 43,826 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 11 hours ago, Atl Falcon said: Christopher Columbus So we want to conduct our hiring search after the fashion of a dude who set sail hoping to get to India the long way around, and stumbled on a bunch of new dirt by accident? Seems responsible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ovie_Lover 29,844 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 19 minutes ago, JDaveG said: He might be a great HC 5-10 years from now. But he's green as a seasick frog right now. I don’t understand the love for Brady and hate for Hackett on this board. For me I want Hackett Smith Brady I guess? marvinthemartian, JDaveG and Jumpin Jehosaphat 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ovie_Lover 29,844 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 11 hours ago, Atl Falcon said: Brady comes with high risk but honestly who doesn’t if they’ve never been an NFL HC before. Columbus took a chance and see what happened? The earth’s not flat lol Columbus was a genocidal maniac. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PriMeTiiMe 7,965 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I'm good with any of these 3. My least favorite of them would probably be Hackett. 1) Smith 2) Brady 3) Hackett Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Atl Falcon 4,157 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 29 minutes ago, JDaveG said: So we want to conduct our hiring search after the fashion of a dude who set sail hoping to get to India the long way around, and stumbled on a bunch of new dirt by accident? Seems responsible. Yes for those who can take a joke 😝 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.