Jump to content

Falcons defensive alignment may be changing in 2020, and here’s a breakdown of what that means


Recommended Posts

https://www.thefalcoholic.com/2020/9/8/21426597/falcons-defensive-alignment-breakdown-dan-quinn-damontae-kazee-ricardo-allen-keanu-neal

 

by Eric J. Robinson for the Falcoholic

 

Ahead of the Atlanta Falcons week one season opener on Sunday, a hot off the press release of the updated depth chart was released. Sure, may seem a bit mundane to some as a common occurrence from teams, but a more in-depth look at the depth chart shows a unique alignment on defense that exhibits what football nerds have been clamoring for.

Today, we take a deeper look into the Falcons defensive approach per the depth chart, and what it may all mean once the season commences.

Same formation, different concept (sort of)

For those that have been following the Falcons closely during the Dan Quinn era in Atlanta, you are already informed that defensively, the team has been operating out of a 4-2-5/3-4 hybrid scheme with ‘Bear’ fronts. This may be a foreign language to some folks, but as Quinn migrated from the Pacific Northwest to the South, a few remnants of that Seahawks defense came with him, albeit with some tweaks and modifications.

The nickel coverage look for the Falcons is a true staple of their defense for the most part. According to Football Outsiders, the Falcons defense ranked sixth in the NFL last season in terms of usage of the nickel defense, operating out of the alignment 71% of the time. Saying the nickel configuration is a common theme for the Falcons is an understatement.

The latest release of the team’s depth chart for week one shows plenty of similarities. Starting on the defensive line is the combination of defensive ends Dante Fowler Jr., and Takkarist McKinley with defensive tackles Grady Jarrett and Tyeler Davison on the interior. No surprise there.

The expected starters at linebacker play out as such as Deion Jones and Foye Oluokun are manning the middle and weak-side linebacker spots, respectively.

On the back end of the defense is where things get very, very interesting.

In past seasons, the Falcons 4-3 Under/4-2-5 scheme was often seen with a slot cornerback as that fifth defensive back. That may still be the case at various times depending on matchup, of course, especially with the Falcons signing Darqueze Dennard. This time around, per the depth chart’s listing of starters, that fifth defensive back that is instead a safety. That likely means the team is looking to deploy Keanu Neal, Ricardo Allen, and Damontae Kazee on the field simultaneously.

I hear the question that is being posed in your mental compartment right now: “What does the three safety look provide for the defense, Eric?” Well, for one, it gives the Falcons a number of options that they have not explored in seasons past. Unique blitz packages can be examined a little more because of Neal’s ability to be effective near the line of scrimmage, something the Falcons could stand to utilize more often.

cover2_medium.gif
Here is a image of what is asked from defenders in the Tampa 2 concept. Safeties are assigned to cover their half of the field, linebackers cover hooks and curls or deeper depending on play diagnosis, corners are assigned to cover flats first or get depth if no route is in their underneath zone.

Also, instead of the always utilized Cover-3 zone concept, the Falcons can incorporate more Cover-2 looks because of the presence of Kazee and Allen on the back end. Keep in mind that the new defensive coordinator this season is Raheem Morris, who is a “Tampa 2” disciple because of his time with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, where he used it extensively.

Other capabilities and notes

As I mentioned earlier, the blitz opportunities can also abound in this particular formation. In 2019, the Falcons were 22nd in the NFL in attempted blitzes, sending an extra defender(s) just 24% of the time. A lot of that was a result of the coaching staff wanting to stay true to the concept of generating pressure with their front four on the defensive line. The flexibility of the three-safety look on defense can improve those numbers because of the athleticism and versatility the defense possesses, and the pass rush does need to improve.

Many are also wondering what does this mean for the slot corners Darqueze Dennard and Kendall Sheffield. Again, the word for the day is ‘versatility’. It’s possible to insert Dennard or Sheffield in the slot while still shuffling the safety trio depending on matchup and game situation. There is also the possibility of sliding Neal at weak-side linebacker while also having five defensive backs on the field, which would provide a modified 4-2-5 or even a 4-1-6 alignment, depending on how much they want to confuse the opposition. Sowing some chaos and getting their best defenders on the field would be a welcome sight.

Simply put, this particular defensive concept can open up things for the Falcons. It allows them to get a number of athletes on the field and also gives opposing offenses much more to prepare for. It’s an important season for the Falcons, a time to roll back the sleeves and leave it all out on the field, and this new alignment can help.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, FalconsIn2012 said:

I like big Nickel, but you can’t convince me that Rico or Kazee are close to Dennard or Sheffield in the slot.  

Rico is a very good slot when need be. He singlehandedly saved a game against the bucs when he had to take over slot. They were killing Poole and making a comeback. Ppl tend to forget Allen was a ballhawk corner out of college. True he hasn’t played the position much since switching to safety but he’s not bad. Not bad enough to the point we’d miss Denard on any given drive. The great thing about this is we can run so many variations. It comes down to matchup. 3 safeties won’t be every game. It depends on the opponent. Mainly depending on if they can run. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheFatboi said:

Rico is a very good slot when need be. He singlehandedly saved a game against the bucs when he had to take over slot. They were killing Poole and making a comeback. Ppl tend to forget Allen was a ballhawk corner out of college. True he hasn’t played the position much since switching to safety but he’s not bad. Not bad enough to the point we’d miss Denard on any given drive. 

I like Rico wherever he plays...but Dennard is a better slot corner.  Coaches said he was our best DB in camp if I remember right

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TheFatboi said:

Rico is a very good slot when need be. He singlehandedly saved a game against the bucs when he had to take over slot. They were killing Poole and making a comeback. Ppl tend to forget Allen was a ballhawk corner out of college. True he hasn’t played the position much since switching to safety but he’s not bad. Not bad enough to the point we’d miss Denard on any given drive. The great thing about this is we can run so many variations. It comes down to matchup. 3 safeties won’t be every game. It depends on the opponent. Mainly depending on if they can run. 

Suave is a decent slot corner but Dennard has been one of the best in the league in the slot.

Why have him sit on the bench and watch Suave on even one play? Makes no sense to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, FalconsIn2012 said:

I like Rico wherever he plays...but Dennard is a better lit corner.  Coaches said he was our best DB in camp if I remember right

He is. But that doesn’t mean he will be missed on a given play or drive. It’s not a steep drop off. And I don’t recall him saying denard was the “best DB” at camp. He was def the best nickel. I could only give him that title if he was playing every position. Slot, LCB, RCB, SS, and FS. Again, don’t look at this as an every game thing. It’s about matchups and who we’re playing at the end of the day. 3 safeties makes sense against Seattle because they like to run the ball. And Russell willl take off. You get 3 better tacklers than denard in that package. Against the saints I would think we’d go back to 2 safeties with denard primarily at nickel because the saints like to throw and their slot can run. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, FalconFanSince1970 said:

Suave is a decent slot corner but Dennard has been one of the best in the league in the slot.

Why have him sit on the bench and watch Suave on even one play? Makes no sense to me.

I’m not disputing that. I’m looking at the matchup. That’s what it depends on. And it’s not like they will stay 3 safety. It’s about the versatility we can do. I think everybody is looking at this wrong. That’s not THE starting package. It’s just the package against Seattle and it makes sense. They still try to pound the rock out of pass formations. Denard will still play. Guaranteed. He’s not sitting on the bench all game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheFatboi said:

I’m not disputing that. I’m looking at the matchup. That’s what it depends on. And it’s not like they will stay 3 safety. It’s about the versatility we can do. I think everybody is looking at this wrong. That’s not THE starting package. It’s just the package against Seattle and it makes sense. They still try to pound the rock out of pass formations. Denard will still play. Guaranteed. He’s not sitting on the bench all game. 

Folks are panicking over formations just because of how last year started with DQ.

Morris in the DC now, let him work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember guys, Morris took the defense from this:

To this:

In basically just a Bye week...

Side note: Yeah, Baldy was grilling this team last year for their busted coverages weeks 1-8. (Mostly, somehow we showed up against the Eagles lol)

But he is a cool cat and gave credit when we turned it around.

@FalconsIn2012 ‘s thread on this kinda thing is spot on as well.

The turnaround for HISTORIC levels of bad coverage/pass D...(yes, even for Falcons....)challenging the Dolphins who were tanking from B4 week 1 essentially and had players like Minkah demanding a trade out....was impressive.

To go from THAT bad to dominant defense?!

I wonder what our DVOA after the Bye was vs the rest of the league during that time?

If that trends continues, we can compete with anybody.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheFatboi said:

He is. But that doesn’t mean he will be missed on a given play or drive. It’s not a steep drop off. And I don’t recall him saying denard was the “best DB” at camp. He was def the best nickel. I could only give him that title if he was playing every position. Slot, LCB, RCB, SS, and FS. Again, don’t look at this as an every game thing. It’s about matchups and who we’re playing at the end of the day. 3 safeties makes sense against Seattle because they like to run the ball. And Russell willl take off. You get 3 better tacklers than denard in that package. Against the saints I would think we’d go back to 2 safeties with denard primarily at nickel because the saints like to throw and their slot can run. 

This exactly.  Versatility to tailor the defense to account for the opponent's strengths.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TheFatboi said:

Rico is a very good slot when need be. He singlehandedly saved a game against the bucs when he had to take over slot. They were killing Poole and making a comeback. Ppl tend to forget Allen was a ballhawk corner out of college. True he hasn’t played the position much since switching to safety but he’s not bad. Not bad enough to the point we’d miss Denard on any given drive. The great thing about this is we can run so many variations. It comes down to matchup. 3 safeties won’t be every game. It depends on the opponent. Mainly depending on if they can run. 

Yeah I was at that game. Rico was an absolute beast in the slot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep seeing people be concerned that big nickle is gonna be like are pure nickle form. I think the big nickle will essentially be our 4-3 base except for maybe a few situations, but when teams go 3 Wide id say probably 90-95% will be a standard nickle with 3 of the 4 CBs on the field. Terrell Oliver Dennard and Sheffield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...