Jump to content

We just reached for Terrell


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

explain why you are right

Should have fired TD when we had the chance

Terrell is a good corner We did not mortgage the rest of the draft to get him Tons of good players between 16 and 47 to build out this team. Do I love it...no but I can get with it.

The dang point is that we could have traded back 3-6 picks and still got him.....If not him a dang LB that we freaking needed and at the same time we pick up another pick or 2 to allow us to be more flexible. 

If he is our guy cool. Im not mad. Its the same thing that OAK did last yr or what the giants did w Danny dimes. If they are your guy, cool. But he IS NOT a #16 pick. He would have been there later or another player we desperately need would be there later. Why not trade back?

Edited by WFColonel56
Link to post
Share on other sites

In some of the Scouting reports I read he was the #11 CB and a 3rd round grade.  Definitely, mentioned he was grabby and tend to get penalties.  Feel, we have a string of those CB's around here. We'll see but thought there were better players to be taken.

Edited by cehoward13
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, WFColonel56 said:

The dang point is that we could have traded back 3-6 picks and still got him.....If not him a dang LB that we freaking needed and at the same time we pick up another pick or 2 to allow us to be more flexible. 

If he is our guy cool. Im not mad. Its the same thing that OAK did last yr or what the giants did w Danny dimes. If they are your guy, cool. But he IS NOT a #16 pick. He would have been there later or another player we desperately need would be there later. Why not trade back?

Would he have been there in the second round? We've had this happen before where they said they were planning to trade back, but didnt have any takers. Sounds like they tried to trade up, but that didn't happen, so...

If that's the case, do you just go without a CB1 because value? We're in a tough spot with Trufant's salary not worth his production anymore.

Edited by B3TD
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cehoward13 said:

In some of the Scouting reports I read he was the #11 CB and a 3rd round grade.  Definitely, mentioned he was grabby and tend to get penalties.  Feel, we have a sting of those CB's around here. We'll see but thought there were better players to be taken.

Don't talk logic and reason around here....you'll get burned at the stake.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...