gtech1 Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Would anybody be mad if the Falcons took either of them at 16? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFanSince1969 Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 I would be irate with a first round wr gkgrimes, Francis York Morgan, BamaBirdLady and 8 others 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwifalcon Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 If Trufant is off loaded Henderson for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etherdome Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 I am a BPA guy. The real question is whether either one of them would be the BPA at #16. VTCrunkler, Run 'n' Shoot, gtech1 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1989Fan Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 If we took Ruggs I would loose my friggin mind. mtldirtybird, Boise Falcon Fan, BamaBirdLady and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando C. Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 C.J. Henderson would be nice... to tell you the truth... but I really would like a S o LB... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foo Falcons Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Henry Ruggs would absolutely have this fan base saying WTF till Koetter proved otherwise so nah on him ha But Henderson I could definitely get on board with. After a week or so of also thinking WTF ha depending on the draft of course. He after all might be BPA ATLSlobberKnockers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romfal Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Ruggs is a hard sell, would rather take Jonathan Taylor...Would have no problem with a corner, I'm not sold on us having 2 long term starters and depth is always good there. If a new CBA is signed I expect us to June 1st Trufant mtldirtybird, gtech1, ant.accurate and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usmcdirtybird Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 If Ruggs is the BPA and we do not reach for another player. I can live with it. I might not like it but I can live with it. If we went a skill position then I would love Swift instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidecar Falcon Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Take the BPA at a position of need. Don’t reach for 2nd tier talent based on levels of perceived need. At this point in the draft we should still have the top S, C, G, and RB still left on the board. Judge the talent left based on their individual ability. If the talent disparity is extensive, then take the BPA at any position of need. If the talent disparity is negligible, then take the BPA at the position of highest need. VTCrunkler, papachaz, AreJayDubya and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLSlobberKnockers Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 I'm not going to get mad no matter what they do. If they took Ruggs then they better put up 30ppg. Henderson could be the defensive b.p.a @16. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foo Falcons Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 4 minutes ago, Sidecar Falcon said: Take the BPA at a position of need. Don’t reach for 2nd tier talent based on levels of perceived need. At this point in the draft we should still have the top S, C, G, and RB still left on the board. Judge the talent left based on their individual ability. If the talent disparity is extensive, then take the BPA at any position of need. If the talent disparity is negligible, then take the BPA at the position of highest need. Fa sho. Best C definitely there, IMO Ruiz or Biadazz. Best S probably still there: Delpit and McKinney. Best G maybe Thomas or Wirfs possibly. Best HB Swift or Dobbins. Of the latest I'd say Wirfs. What say you? vitaman and Sidecar Falcon 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLSlobberKnockers Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 1 minute ago, FalconsAllDayUrDay said: Fa sho. Best C definitely there, IMO Ruiz or Biadazz. Best S probably still there: Delpit and McKinney. Best G maybe Thomas or Wirfs possibly. Best HB Swift or Dobbins. Of the latest I'd say Wirfs. What say you? I think Winfield is the best safety. I know that's not popular opinion, but McKinney's workout was a let down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foo Falcons Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Yeah forgot about Windiled but I think 16 is a reach. Especially with hopefully a healthy Keanu coming back with Kazee starting and Rico as the backup. A fourth safety is probably what we'd be drafting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1989Fan Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 8 minutes ago, FalconsAllDayUrDay said: Fa sho. Best C definitely there, IMO Ruiz or Biadazz. Best S probably still there: Delpit and McKinney. Best G maybe Thomas or Wirfs possibly. Best HB Swift or Dobbins. Of the latest I'd say Wirfs. What say you? Best C is Ruiz or Cushenberry, both will def be there..16 too early McKinney best S, if they are gonna move from Neal he is an option. Q sounds like he is still all in on Neal though Wirfs best OL...would love to see him here, but small chanc3 he is there at 16. RB is Taylor or Swift. RB is a dark horse for us at 16. They seem pretty set on improving the position, but TD has never taken one before 3rd round and this could be a historically deep RB draft. i can see a LB at 16 if the DL spot isn’t a good fit. I can also see a TD moving up or down depending how the board falls. hollywood 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidecar Falcon Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 6 minutes ago, FalconsAllDayUrDay said: Fa sho. Best C definitely there, IMO Ruiz or Biadazz. Best S probably still there: Delpit and McKinney. Best G maybe Thomas or Wirfs possibly. Best HB Swift or Dobbins. Of the latest I'd say Wirfs. What say you? I think Wirfs goes top 15, along with Thomas. Both S should still be there. Dobbins I think lasts until the 3rd round. Swift gone in the top 20. Of all the RBs, I like Taylor the best, but I don’t think he’s the type of player you extend past his first contract here (RBs in general) Right now I’m split on Biadasz and Delpit. On one hand S has been neglected for years and being able to get the best one is tempting. I like what I saw from McKinney too. However this is because our scheme needs that position locked down. For me, Center is the bigger long term issue for the team. Once Mack is gone, I think we’ll see a degradation of the OL. Having Biadasz there will minimize that sting. Pacific_Falcon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rings Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Im not a huge Ruggs fan, for as fast as he is he isn’t that great at the deep ball, he is better at the intermediate stuff though. For a guy to run a sub 4.3 and only have 4 receptions of 20+ yards on 527 snaps it seems very strange to me. Although it would be funny to have a third Alabama receiver. I would not be mad with Henderson, I think he is going to be really good. 1989Fan, Pacific_Falcon and Artys Arryn 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foo Falcons Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 5 minutes ago, 1989Fan said: Best C is Ruiz or Cushenberry, both will def be there..16 too early McKinney best S, if they are gonna move from Neal he is an option. Q sounds like he is still all in on Neal though Wirfs best OL...would love to see him here, but small chanc3 he is there at 16. RB is Taylor or Swift. RB is a dark horse for us at 16. They seem pretty set on improving the position, but TD has never taken one before 3rd round and this could be a historically deep RB draft. i can see a LB at 16 if the DL spot isn’t a good fit. I can also see a TD moving up or down depending how the board falls. Yeah I definitely dont see an HB Rd one in any scenario. OG I don't see either unless Wirfs or Thomas is there and like you said neither probably will be. LB is a serious consideration with Murray and Queen. To me Queen is too much if a reach though based on one year of true production. And Safett is down the list of needs IMO. If not DE or DT, LB for sure is my next option. With Henderson or Fulton pooossibly being in consideration Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foo Falcons Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 5 minutes ago, Sidecar Falcon said: I think Wirfs goes top 15, along with Thomas. Both S should still be there. Dobbins I think lasts until the 3rd round. Swift gone in the top 20. Of all the RBs, I like Taylor the best, but I don’t think he’s the type of player you extend past his first contract here (RBs in general) Right now I’m split on Biadasz and Delpit. On one hand S has been neglected for years and being able to get the best one is tempting. I like what I saw from McKinney too. However this is because our scheme needs that position locked down. For me, Center is the bigger long term issue for the team. Once Mack is gone, I think we’ll see a degradation of the OL. Having Biadasz there will minimize that sting. Yeah Biadasz wouldnt be hard to sell most people on but hed have to start year one. I mean not truthfully but to keep people happy. If hes a cornerstone once Mack is gone I'm all in. You just know with TD and DQs jobs on the line they're gonna go for someone who makes an instant impact. Hopefully it ain't HB but you really never know. Ridley surprised the **** outta everyone. And again, safety ain't a major concern to me. If not DL, LB I'd the way to go I believe Sidecar Falcon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jfalconsp Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Not a fan of Ruggs, pass. Rings 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidecar Falcon Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 8 minutes ago, FalconsAllDayUrDay said: Yeah Biadasz wouldnt be hard to sell most people on but hed have to start year one. I mean not truthfully but to keep people happy. If hes a cornerstone once Mack is gone I'm all in. You just know with TD and DQs jobs on the line they're gonna go for someone who makes an instant impact. Hopefully it ain't HB but you really never know. Ridley surprised the **** outta everyone. And again, safety ain't a major concern to me. If not DL, LB I'd the way to go I believe My plan would be to put Biadasz at LG for a season. This will give him an opportunity to learn next to Mack before taking over his role in 2021. I’d be ambivalent if it was RB. Talent wise there could be a noticeable disparity, but it’s a hard sell regardless. If we did go RB, I would want to see at lease one trade back while gaining a knot her 2nd pick. Those picks could mitigate the sting of selecting a RB a bit. Especially since the 2nd tier prospects this year are pretty deep. Another dark horse option I wouldn’t be opposed to, would be trading up to get Simmons. It would cost us both 2nds but he looks like a bonafide game changer. But that’s a pipe dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foo Falcons Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 3 minutes ago, Sidecar Falcon said: My plan would be to put Biadasz at LG for a season. This will give him an opportunity to learn next to Mack before taking over his role in 2021. I’d be ambivalent if it was RB. Talent wise there could be a noticeable disparity, but it’s a hard sell regardless. If we did go RB, I would want to see at lease one trade back while gaining a knot her 2nd pick. Those picks could mitigate the sting of selecting a RB a bit. Especially since the 2nd tier prospects this year are pretty deep. Another dark horse option I wouldn’t be opposed to, would be trading up to get Simmons. It would cost us both 2nds but he looks like a bonafide game changer. But that’s a pipe dream. Yeah Biadasz at LG could work for a season. Not sure if hes played there before but it could work. Only thing is I dont see TD taking a risk on a player at a new position if so. Probably gonna be swinging for the fences which leads us back to HB. Maybe it is a possibility ha But yeah a trade back for an HB I could eventually get on board with. Still would surprise me but if it means an extra 2nd or even early 3rd I'd be down. Though 2nd ir 3rd round could probably get us a good guy, just no Swift no doubt. I'm looking at Trautman as a 2nd myself. Shown him a lotta love Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artys Arryn Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Would prefer K9 to both but Henderson definitely has upside. Plus improving coverage, improves pass rush. If the plan is to move on from Tru, then Henderson makes a lot of sense. Rings 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRUNKuno Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 7 hours ago, FalconFanSince1969 said: I would be irate with a first round wr Gonna be honest, I would do flips of joy if we got CeeDee Lamb. I’d exchange Ridley for him any day. In that same breath, if we drafted a receiver I’d laugh so hard at the FO’s level of ineptitude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoneOne01 Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Henderson genuinely might be the best player on the board at 16. If they go in that direction, fine. Not interested in Ruggs despite liking him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.