KCFalcon22

Mcgary

122 posts in this topic

On 10/21/2019 at 9:43 AM, Cole World said:

No Week 10 against the Saints.

You only have to be out 8 weeks. He went on IR after week 1 vs the Vikings.

https://www.ajc.com/sports/football/lindstorm-has-day-window-can-activated-after-saints-game/QHQacXFGwOiTeiClZXxldL/#

"Lindstrom has a 21-day practice window. He can return anytime after missing eight games. The Saints’ game will be his eighth."

ya_boi_j likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, #1ATLFALCONSFAN said:

https://www.ajc.com/sports/football/lindstorm-has-day-window-can-activated-after-saints-game/QHQacXFGwOiTeiClZXxldL/#

"Lindstrom has a 21-day practice window. He can return anytime after missing eight games. The Saints’ game will be his eighth."

LOL, you posted an AJC article written by D-Led.

It's 8 weeks bro

Quote

IR-Return Designation

Not everyone who ends up on IR has to see their season end for good. Players must remain on IR for eight weeks before being eligible to rejoin their teams in Week 9 via the IR-Return Designation. The NFL changed the IR-return designation in 2017 so that teams are allowed to bring two players back from IR. Previously, the rule allowed just one player to return from the list.

This was a great change for teams as most clubs have more than one injured player capable of returning at some point in the season.

In 2016, the Bengals had an unfortunate situation in which running back Cedric Peerman and cornerback William Jackson III were both healthy enough to come off of IR, but Peerman ended up getting the one to get the only nod. Had this new IR-return rule been in place, both players would have been able to come off IR.

Last year, the NFL changed the IR with return designation so that you no longer have to designate the player who will get the designation at the time they are placed on the list. Now, teams can bring back any two players they've placed on IR at any time after the eight week mandate to be on the list has been met.

Previously, if a team wanted to use the one return designation spot, they had to declare it when the player was placed on IR. Now, they can just see who is getting healthy quickly, and take them off IR after they’ve been on the list for eight weeks (or more).

One constraint here is that a player must be on the 53-man roster in Week 1 to be eligible for the IR designation to return. That means, anyone who was placed on IR before roster cuts were made to trim the roster down to 53 players is not eligible.

 

Edited by Cole World
Iron Saint and Schwarzwald like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, #1ATLFALCONSFAN said:

https://www.ajc.com/sports/football/lindstorm-has-day-window-can-activated-after-saints-game/QHQacXFGwOiTeiClZXxldL/#

"Lindstrom has a 21-day practice window. He can return anytime after missing eight games. The Saints’ game will be his eighth."

FYI...the 21 days don't begin until Quinn deem Lindstrom as one of their two designees to return from IR. Once he starts practicing Quinn has 21 day to activate him to the 53 man roster. Until then he can remain on IR.

Schwarzwald likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a combination of a lot of things. Our two studs are not playing at the level they need to be playing at (Mack and Matthews). Combine that with a struggling rookie and two guards who are barely adequate and you have a terrible offensive line. Then, you have a play caller who loves his long developing plays and it is ugly...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Jpg428gggg said:

it is a combination of a lot of things. Our two studs are not playing at the level they need to be playing at (Mack and Matthews). Combine that with a struggling rookie and two guards who are barely adequate and you have a terrible offensive line. Then, you have a play caller who loves his long developing plays and it is ugly...

spot on. Plus no running game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Falcons might have the opportunity to get another great OL in this years draft. Andrew Thomas from UGA and Tristan Wirfs, two top tier OL may fall in their lap come draft day, they are NFL plug and play ready. McGary was another example of Falcons poor front office busting a nut over nothing. They reached for a reach. Falcons GOTTA get rid of McKay, Webster, Emry and Sabo they are worthless as boobs on a bull. 

rbad8717 and vitaman like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, ya_boi_j said:

But still, do you know how rare it is for people to actually search for threads that aren’t on the front page lol

Oh you’re talking about the search option. I thought you were talking about something else lol.

Schwarzwald and ya_boi_j like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/20/2019 at 2:31 PM, KCFalcon22 said:

I know I know it’s a learning curve but this kid is getting whoooooped.  He has his legs open like a catholic school girl. Any hope for him or BUST

Silly thread, but your post did bring back some fond memories......:ninja:

 

Iron Saint likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Refried Beans said:

Jake Matthews has and never will be a stud, you are confusing him with his father. Jake Matthews is a push over with no manhood. 

LOL, go tell him that...

All this big talk on social media....

Flyin' In DC likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/20/2019 at 2:31 PM, KCFalcon22 said:

I know I know it’s a learning curve but this kid is getting whoooooped.  He has his legs open like a catholic school girl.  Any hope for him or BUST

It's what you get with years of bad roster building and needing to depend on rooks as saviours. I'd cut Mack, Carpenter and Sombrero next year, move Lindstrom to center, McGary to guard, Bloodline to RT, draft the UGA tackle and add a young mid level vet swing guy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, FalconFanSince1970 said:

It's what you get with years of bad roster building and needing to depend on rooks as saviours. I'd cut Mack, Carpenter and Sombrero next year, move Lindstrom to center, McGary to guard, Bloodline to RT, draft the UGA tackle and add a young mid level vet swing guy. 

so you want a Rookie to manage LT... and move 3 players out of position ... so that would make them rookies in that position.. a rookie OL... yeah that is the way to go....

ChickenBiscuit likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fernando C. said:

so you want a Rookie to manage LT... and move 3 players out of position ... so that would make them rookies in that position.. a rookie OL... yeah that is the way to go....

It's what you get with years of bad roster building

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, FalconFanSince1970 said:

It's what you get with years of bad roster building and needing to depend on rooks as saviours. I'd cut Mack, Carpenter and Sombrero next year, move Lindstrom to center, McGary to guard, Bloodline to RT, draft the UGA tackle and add a young mid level vet swing guy. 

When you are more than desperate for any simulation of a pass rush, drafting the UGA tackle would be a horrible move...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Boise Falcon Fan said:

When you are more than desperate for any simulation of a pass rush, drafting the UGA tackle would be a horrible move...

When you are desperate to fill gaping holes with rookies you make picks like Vic Teasley. The draft should be a long term roster building solution. Not a hole plugging solution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FalconFanSince1970 said:

When you are desperate to fill gaping holes with rookies you makes picks like Vic Teasley. The draft should be a long term roster building solution. Not a hole plugging solution.

Drafting high, the Falcons need to get a DE or DT.  There are enough guys available that picking one of them would be a "long term roster building solution".  Sorry to break the news to you, but drafting another OL high in the draft is not the right move this year.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Fernando C. said:

so you want a Rookie to manage LT... and move 3 players out of position ... so that would make them rookies in that position.. a rookie OL... yeah that is the way to go....

Like his plan is worse than our GMs this year?  We signed three free agents (Sambrailo, Carpenter, Brown) then drafted two more OL in the first round only to end up with the worst line in the NFL.  

Now, we get to do it again next year.

Refried Beans likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Falcons front office aren't football people, they are a silver spoon feed ambulance chasing lawyer, a mountain bike riding preppy, a strength and conditioning coach, a RB coach and a has been from the 1970s and we wonder why we fail drafting linemen? Here's a cheat sheet to help them out. Mack is OLD, Matthews is SOFT, and McGary is Green.  Cut Mack, trade Matthews once his number don't hurt the cap. Get Ben Garland back  in  free agency for center. Draft Andrew Thomas from UGA or Tristan Wirfs from Iowa and get a whole new front office with some scouts that have some manhood. Like Tmodel66 says it is absolutely RIDICULOUS that we picked up three free agents for o-line and then drafted two more and our o-line STILL sucks. And we think changing the COACH will make us win, get real. Come on man. Falcons roster is TURIBLE.  Coach and front office are trash. Whole thing is an embarrassment to the city. Blank should be ashamed, it is a poor reflection on him and his business acumen to have a franchise this poorly assembled.

Edited by Refried Beans
gtech1, Mr.Falcon79 and vitaman like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to bad of an idea Refried Beans. But I am not sure about letting Mathews go. He would look way better with a competent guard next to him. But if no defensive player is worth our pick I would select Andrew Thomas, make Mcgary our swing if he couldn’t transition to guard. And see how it played out with Thomas & Mcgary’s development before deciding on Mathews future. Or trade back and get two 1st round draft picks, possibly more.

Edited by Mr.Falcon79
vitaman and Refried Beans like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now