Jump to content

All Matt Ryan had to do was throw 6 TD's and over 450 yards. If he can't do that then what good is he?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What a bust.

Really nothing Matt Ryan could have done. He honestly played well.    Watson was throwing to wide open receivers all day. Defense has zero heart. Grady is the only one who was playing hard. 

Matt isn't the problem with this team, despite him playing poorly earlier this year. The whole team is in disarray. I'm usually pretty level headed, but I think we need to blow it up. Kick TD to the c

19 minutes ago, Francis York Morgan said:

"Soft zones" is the first hint I need that a person knows buzzwords more than football. The players were soft and undisciplined, not the zones. Kept vacating their areas of responsibility and blowing their coverages. We got beat just as hard or harder when we went man because our pathetic players were getting beat one on one by literally everyone.

Lol really? You're gonna chirp me for using a buzz word? Don't act like you're some sage who knows everything. I simply asked you a question. Quinn's defensive philosophy is straight garbage and there is a way to coach players to not vacate their areas of responsibility fyi. Hence why the buzz word "soft" gets thrown around so much. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Falcanuck said:

Lol really? You're gonna chirp me for using a buzz word? Don't act like you're some sage who knows everything. I simply asked you a question. Quinn's defensive philosophy is straight garbage and there is a way to coach players to not vacate their areas of responsibility fyi. Hence why the buzz word "soft" gets thrown around so much. 

I'm not acting like a sage, this is basic stuff. Some vague "soft zone" critique isn't why we lost today. The team was plain ol bad and the only thing zone coverages had to do with it was when our players straight up blew them and played hero ball instead of covering their responsibility. In man, they got whooped. Consistently. And were worse against the run, too (naturally).

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Francis York Morgan said:

I'm not acting like a sage, this is basic stuff. Some vague "soft zone" critique isn't why we lost today. The team was plain ol bad and the only thing zone coverages had to do with it was when our players straight up blew them and played hero ball instead of covering their responsibility. In man, they got whooped. Consistently. And were worse against the run, too (naturally).

Never even mentioned today’s game for a second. Referring specifically to Quinn’s D philosophy. It’s zone. It’s simple. And it’s soft as ****. It’s not a cliche, you’re simply used to hearing it on here. And it’s true. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...