Posted September 29 I’m curious because I don’t see any type of scheme to how we play Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 Long developing wr routes behind a weak offensive line leading to sacks on the qb uk falcs fan likes this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 Minimalism. Our offensive philosophy is to minimize our weapons and our chances of winning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 Its pretty bad. No identity and no heart. Team has given up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 First half zero option, second half game over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 4 minutes ago, NUPE said: I’m curious because I don’t see any type of scheme to how we play Judging by this year? Nihilism. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 1 minute ago, lju713 said: 3 and out With a penalty of course. lju713 likes this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 I really thought Koetter would be an upgrade over Sark. So far I have been wrong. dardan and SkerFalcon8710 like this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 Just now, marvinthemartian said: I really thought Koetter would be an upgrade over Sark. So far I have been wrong. I said it as soon as Koetter was hired: he was fired for a reason. He held Ryan back for YEARS. It took Shanahan one year to un-Koetterize Ryan, and then #2 was the league MVP. Under Koetter, Ryan was regarded as "a poor man's Eli Manning". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 The line isn’t bad. The offense is dated and no longer plays to Matt’s strengths. Why does every play have to be 12 yards down field, except on 3rd and long... Get Matt an offense like they run in New England where receivers are open in front of Matt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 1 minute ago, Roanoke Falcon said: I said it as soon as Koetter was hired: he was fired for a reason. He held Ryan back for YEARS. It took Shanahan one year to un-Koetterize Ryan, and then #2 was the league MVP. Under Koetter, Ryan was regarded as "a poor man's Eli Manning". Who regarded him that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 The team doesn’t know so how could we possibly know Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 The only excuse you could make for koetter is he has no opportunity to establish a run because we always seem to be 14 points down within 5 minutes. With that being said it is unbelievably predictable. Absolutely zero inventiveness dardan likes this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 Go back to 2014 and watch that tape, smh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 6 minutes ago, Jesus said: Who regarded him that? I heard 3 ESPN talking heads say it, and a lot of anti-Ryan posters here. For what it's worth, I disagreed then, and I disagree now. If you give Matt Ryan a good OC, he can be a very good QB still. I just don't know if the baggage here will allow him to do that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 Move the ball just well enough to disappoint the fans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 Our offense relies on people beating their man, no scheming to get people open. That's why our guys are blanketed on almost every throw Atlantafan21 likes this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 29 1st down - Hand Freeman the ball, lose a yard 2nd down - Throw an incompletion or take a sack 3rd down - Throw the ball to Hooper or Sanu and maybe Julio occasionally and get a 1st down once in a blue moon Also, factor in the usual penalty or turnover every other drive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
