Jump to content

Falcons Inactives vs Titans


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Dirtybird3 said:

I was gonna start it's own thread, but. 

 

Just curious, why is Senat even on the team? 

 

Not saying he's trash, but I can't even remember the last time I've seen him active or on the feild. Or heard a legit reason as to the reason for his lack of use 

Davidson took his job, but he’s good enough to keep for depth in case of injury.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MAD597 said:

We are so stupid for benching Ollison when our run game is suffering. A decent coaching staff would at least try him out to see how he performed.

Our ideal RB rotation is going to be Ito and Ollison.

They do try him out, every day at practice, with a very competent coaching staff on who should and shouldn't be active on game day.  Maybe it's performance, maybe it's grasp of the game plan that week, but to think that the coaching staff isn't in a constant state of evaluation for the 45 active is intellectually inaccurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, blutarski said:

They do try him out, every day at practice, with a very competent coaching staff on who should and shouldn't be active on game day.  Maybe it's performance, maybe it's grasp of the game plan that week, but to think that the coaching staff isn't in a constant state of evaluation for the 45 active is intellectually inaccurate.

This is not a competent coaching staff

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MAD597 said:

This is not a competent coaching staff

We have 3 coaches on the offensive side of the ball who not only been head coaches, but over 50 years combined experience in the NFL in evaluating talent, and been successful at it.  We all have the right to our opinion, but  to call it incompetent is just not accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, blutarski said:

They do try him out, every day at practice, with a very competent coaching staff on who should and shouldn't be active on game day.  Maybe it's performance, maybe it's grasp of the game plan that week, but to think that the coaching staff isn't in a constant state of evaluation for the 45 active is intellectually inaccurate.

Practice and real game are not the same.  

In a real game I can see Luke Stocker sucks yet we keep trotting him out there like he’s Tony Gonzalez.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, KRUNKuno said:

Practice and real game are not the same.  

In a real game I can see Luke Stocker sucks yet we keep trotting him out there like he’s Tony Gonzalez.

Agree, but to insinuate that practice doesn't give a good indication on other factors that play into the decision making, is just not true.  The statement, "they should at least try him out" isn't how the NFL game day actives work, and goes way beyond how someone performs in live action versus practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Atlantafan21 said:

Why the **** is Hill active over Ollison?!? 

Probably real game experience.  Ollison got a ton of carries in preseason but almost all were in the 2nd half against a lot of guys who are reserves and current free agents.  He'll get his chance...hopefully he won't be like Hill and still waiting for consistent ops after two seasons.  Truth is with Ito and Free playing, Hill may not see a single rep.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, blutarski said:

Agree, but to insinuate that practice doesn't give a good indication on other factors that play into the decision making, is just not true.  The statement, "they should at least try him out" isn't how the NFL game day actives work, and goes way beyond how someone performs in live action versus practice.

It took 3 games and an injury for them to realize maybe we can use somebody else at returner and have a 3rd runningback active on gameday in case of emergency.  We played 75% of last week with one runningback.  They make questionable decisions.  They aren’t perfect in their thinking.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Atlantafan21 said:

Why the **** is Hill active over Ollison?!? 

It may not matter whether it's Hill or Ollison. So far Quinn/Koetter have used only two backs. Barner was up next after Ito got the concussion.

Ito is playing so if they keep the same pattern, Hill won't get any carries and the same would go for Ollison if he was active.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...