Jump to content

Clemson vs North Carolina


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Ransack said:

No problem going for two. UNC was living on borrowed time already. That playcall however was complete garbage. Not sure how someone gets paid to pick that play as there best play to score points. It just defys logic.

If you've got a great 2 point conversion play, but when "that" is your 2 point play? Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, frankly88 said:

The only thing I can think is that Brown was thinking about the lack of depth he has and they apparently have with a lot of injuries on defense.  But worse than going for 2 was the TURRIBLE play call that allowed Clemson to use their speed on defense. 

yeah mack brown felt they had no shot in overtime so they went for it.. but going on a option play to the short side was just horrible.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...