ShmevinShmarris 3,066 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Sanus block wasn’t a block in the back? The block was initiated at the LOS but was way outside of the free blocking zone? Anyone got some verbiage for me? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconsFanSince194eva 1,278 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 No dirtybirds999, Falcon from E and Ergo Proxy 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hibachi 539 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 That was Stevie Wonder on Zebra stripes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
octoslash 18,180 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 The defender turned into it, making it look like a block in the back. Geneaut, PokerSteve, dirtybirds999 and 5 others 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
falcons007 22,603 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 He didn’t push him from the back.. you need to watch not see some pics. Drew4719, dirtybirds999, ya_boi_j and 7 others 10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sun Tzu 7 13,926 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 13 minutes ago, falcons007 said: He didn’t push him from the back.. you need to watch not see some pics. Yeah. I wouldn’t call it a block. More like getting in the way. Drew4719 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hjerry 26,122 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 35 minutes ago, falcons007 said: He didn’t push him from the back.. you need to watch not see some pics. 20 minutes ago, Sun Tzu 7 said: Yeah. I wouldn’t call it a block. More like getting in the way. He really didn't push him at all. The defender was headed the direction to head off Julio, and went down, not because he was pushed but because of the change of direction spinning around to go after Julio now in front of him; like was said, more similar to a pick play than a block in the back It wasn't called because there was nothing to call; ticky tack federicofalcon2, Drew4719, Ergo Proxy and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ShmevinShmarris 3,066 Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 43 minutes ago, falcons007 said: He didn’t push him from the back.. you need to watch not see some pics. I mean.. he definitely engages with his back. red falcon 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ergo Proxy 25,926 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 7 minutes ago, ShmevinShmarris said: I mean.. he definitely engages with his back. Defender did more of a re-route on his own and Sanu puts an arm out but it wasn't an obvious shove. To me, it looked like the DB had control of most of his movements and Sanu set a pick 'n roll. Sanu barely touches him in the back. Defender blocks himself out more than any block in back. Refs let it play out because it wasn't obvious. Good no-call. JDaveG, jas82487, octoslash and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
caponine 6,586 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Sanu knew he blocked in the back, missed call. Cant do anything about it now Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ergo Proxy 25,926 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 7 minutes ago, caponine said: Sanu knew he blocked in the back, missed call. Cant do anything about it now lol there wasn't a shove. Sanu extends an arm but the defender fell all on his own. No block in the back. Would've been a terrible call. Like a WR that extends an arm but doesn't push off. Drew4719 and jas82487 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hjerry 26,122 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Do this for me. Just imagine Sanu isn't even there, and imagine the Defender heading into the backfield, stopping, and turning to chase Julio. His movements would've been the same regardless octoslash, Skeetbird, gkgrimes and 6 others 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hjerry 26,122 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Just now, Ergo Proxy said: lol there wasn't a shove. Sanu extends an arm but the defender fell all on his own. No block in the back. Would've been a terrible call. Like a WR that extends an arm but doesn't push off. Julio did that in the endzone on his first TD, and I was worried the refs were going to throw a flag JDaveG, Drew4719 and Ergo Proxy 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dem Birds 10,575 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 You guys saying that was a block in the back are either blind or don't know what a block in the back is lol. Even Doug Pederson said it was clean ATLSlobberKnockers, Ergo Proxy, hjerry and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ki46dinah 1,950 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 After watching the replay of that several times...besides Sanu calling it immediately...so does Free, from the opposite side of the field. Effing hilarious man jidady, Ergo Proxy and Geneaut 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jidady 9,561 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 14 minutes ago, ki46dinah said: After watching the replay of that several times...besides Sanu calling it immediately...so does Free, from the opposite side of the field. Effing hilarious man It shows that our offense is that in sync and aware of one another's abilities. It's one of those subtle benefits of a lot of these guys playings together for a while. Also, that play was fun. Football needs more of that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NWFALCON 4,043 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 No one likes a snitch. rounz 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stray Dog THA GAWD 4,263 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 9 hours ago, ShmevinShmarris said: Sanus block wasn’t a block in the back? The block was initiated at the LOS but was way outside of the free blocking zone? Anyone got some verbiage for me? It definitely was. One of many lucky breaks Atlanta got in a game they clearly should have lost. red falcon 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ya_boi_j 66,047 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Why does it matter? There wasn't a penalty and the play won the game. Instead of making excuses for losses, now we coming up with reasons the game should have been lost. smh Marco102, Butudontseeme™, hjerry and 6 others 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PriMeTiiMe 7,478 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, Stray Dog THA GAWD said: It definitely was. One of many lucky breaks Atlanta got in a game they clearly should have lost. Yeah, definitely should have lost... Last I checked both teams turned the ball over 3 times giving away points to the other. Last I checked Ryan missed back to back TDs and Aghelor alligator armed a TD. Last I checked we missed a FG after those dropped TDs and the Eagles had the turnover on downs so both came away with 0 on the drives. It was a back and forth game that came down to the final drive just like every other Philly game. Neither team played well or deserved to win but someone has to. Geneaut, ATLSlobberKnockers, Ergo Proxy and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UnrealfalcoN 4,128 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 33 minutes ago, Stray Dog THA GAWD said: It definitely was. One of many lucky breaks Atlanta got in a game they clearly should have lost. Hahahahhahaha Does it hurt your little heart that the Falcons won? Nah you still make time to ***** Ergo Proxy, DD: Objective Elite and thanat0s 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Skeetbird 1,859 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 The verbiage is...they didn't see it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DD: Objective Elite 3,779 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 8 hours ago, ShmevinShmarris said: I mean.. he definitely engages with his back. I have a better question, how come the Iggles were not hit with a penalty for having too many men on the field. Watch the clip, when Julio is at the 5 yard line, a Philly player and a couple of coaches make their way onto the field. ya_boi_j and Ergo Proxy 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ShmevinShmarris 3,066 Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) 16 minutes ago, DD: Objective Elite said: I have a better question, how come the Iggles were not hit with a penalty for having too many men on the field. Watch the clip, when Julio is at the 5 yard line, a Philly player and a couple of coaches make their way onto the field. Don’t answer the question with a question. Trying to figure out if it was just a missed call or if there’s some verbiage I don’t know about. Edited September 17, 2019 by ShmevinShmarris Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ShmevinShmarris 3,066 Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) 56 minutes ago, ya_boi_j said: Why does it matter? There wasn't a penalty and the play won the game. Instead of making excuses for losses, now we coming up with reasons the game should have been lost. smh Seeing if there was something to learn from the play. For example Julio’s td on the pick play against Seattle the year we went to the Super Bowl was a legal play because the receiver was blocking within one yard of the LOS. I didn’t know that at the time. Go practice falling down. Edited September 17, 2019 by ShmevinShmarris Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.