PapaJoe 3,233 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 I'm so looking forward to having Lindstrom next to McGary on the right side for the Falcons. As Wes Durham put it (speaking about McGary), “this guy isn’t looking for a fight, he’s going to start one.” Ergo Proxy, Vandy, mtldirtybird and 6 others 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shock 2,287 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, m2Falcons said: I'm so looking forward to having Lindstrom next to McGary on the right side for the Falcons. As Wes Durham put it (speaking about McGary), “this guy isn’t looking for a fight, he’s going to start one.” Hoping McGary beats Ty for the Week 1 spot at RT. Having these two rookies man the right side of our line and for the next decade to come just sounds so glorious. papachaz, gazoo and Ergo Proxy 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BirdGangATL 775 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 We basically wasted money extending Ty and signing 2 guards in the offseason Flying Falcon and ButSkiuup 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shock 2,287 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 (edited) 22 minutes ago, BirdGangATL said: We basically wasted money extending Ty and signing 2 guards in the offseason I wouldn’t say that. Would you rather us have no depth along the OL for another season? F*ck that. One guy goes down and it details the season. Edited July 29, 2019 by shock anm263, Shooter Says, ltstorm2 and 11 others 14 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconFan13 1,626 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 22 minutes ago, BirdGangATL said: We basically wasted money extending Ty and signing 2 guards in the offseason For sure don't agree with this at all. After seeing our OL ravaged by injuries over the years outside of 2016 and then watching our craptacular depth struggle game after game to keep Ryan up or even give him more than 2 seconds to throw the ball. Heck even watching them struggle to get us 1 **** yard on a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th down run play or make holes for freem and and the RB core. Im more than happy to swing a few extra millions to make sure no matter what we have adequate depth for a entire season run to the playoffs and sb if we can make it without worrying the offense is gonna fall flat on it's face again bc of a injury or 2 on the OL. mtldirtybird, Shooter Says, NCCooley and 6 others 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconsIn2012 35,703 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 35 minutes ago, FalconFan13 said: For sure don't agree with this at all. After seeing our OL ravaged by injuries over the years outside of 2016 and then watching our craptacular depth struggle game after game to keep Ryan up or even give him more than 2 seconds to throw the ball. Heck even watching them struggle to get us 1 **** yard on a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th down run play or make holes for freem and and the RB core. Im more than happy to swing a few extra millions to make sure no matter what we have adequate depth for a entire season run to the playoffs and sb if we can make it without worrying the offense is gonna fall flat on it's face again bc of a injury or 2 on the OL. You can’t build a team scarred. With regards to OL, we did just that. Overkill. 58 million allocated to the OL next year is just way, way too much Thats enough for 10 million apiece for each starter plus 8 million left over for the backups ButSkiuup and Atl Falcon 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shock 2,287 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 4 minutes ago, FalconsIn2020 said: You can’t build a team scarred. With regards to OL, we did just that. Overkill. 58 million allocated to the OL next year is just way, way too much Thats enough for 10 million apiece for each starter plus 8 million left over for the backups You also can’t win when your QB is constantly being lit up with subpar protection. We can cut Ty next year if need be. And I’m fine having 3 starting level guards on the roster. mtldirtybird, Charles Wright, Ovie_Lover and 9 others 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconFan13 1,626 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 7 minutes ago, FalconsIn2020 said: You can’t build a team scarred. With regards to OL, we did just that. Overkill. 58 million allocated to the OL next year is just way, way too much Thats enough for 10 million apiece for each starter plus 8 million left over for the backups Make it 5 to 10 million more i didn't know we only spent 58 million that might not be enough honestly. I still see a Schweitzer in there as a backup im not ok on that go find me a better center with another 5 to 7 million. Also thats not building a team scared thats building a team smart and preparing for crap out of your control being injuries. Also as a O-lineman for 8 years of the time i played you can **** sure never have enough good ones same goes for D-line. I would spend the major bulk of my money on the Trenches and get solid to above avg players at the skill positions for less money. vitaman, gazoo, Tim Mazetti and 5 others 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconsIn2012 35,703 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 8 minutes ago, shock said: You also can’t win when your QB is constantly being lit up with subpar protection. We can cut Ty next year if need be. And I’m fine having 3 starting level guards on the roster. If a B+ line can’t be built for 35-40 million then there is an evaluation or scheme problems ButSkiuup 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
octoslash 18,226 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 1 hour ago, BirdGangATL said: We basically wasted money extending Ty and signing 2 guards in the offseason As opposed to what you would've done, which...is.....? Flyin' In DC and mtldirtybird 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TheFatboi 28,995 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 1 hour ago, BirdGangATL said: We basically wasted money extending Ty and signing 2 guards in the offseason Not really. The FO prepared for if another injury riddled season happened. In other words the reserve tank is full. Domed Outter, rugger8, Tim Mazetti and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
octoslash 18,226 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 I wonder how many of these cap-and-contract mom's-basement-couch geniuses just happen to make their brilliant livings saying things like, 'Is that for here or to go?' * *no offense to any food service persons, I was in it for quite a while myself. That was just written to make contrast between their mouths and their abilities. Flyin' In DC and NCCooley 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
youngbloodz 16,281 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 15 minutes ago, FalconsIn2020 said: If a B+ line can’t be built for 35-40 million then there is an evaluation or scheme problems OL and DL are the two hardest position groups to scout now because of high schools and colleges going to the spread offenses. I remember Ozzie Newsome talking about this. mtldirtybird, Vandy and FalconsIn2012 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gazoo 21,256 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 With OL, there is virtually no guaranty a rookie draft pick is going to be able to start, or that if he does start he won’t stink up the field, get benched or get your QB killed. The top pick in the 2008 NFL draft was an OT, picked over Matt Ryan by Miami when they needed a QB. That OT was a bust. Many OL picked high in 1st rounds are busts. So going into this season assuming both our rookie OL would start and play at a high level would have been malpractice. I’m stoked we finally decided to make OL a priority and have guys behind the starters who can play. One injury to Jake, Mack, or whoever starts at LG and no one will question the wisdom of the offseason. Tim Mazetti, mtldirtybird and NCCooley 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SoCalFalconFan 1,699 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 1 hour ago, BirdGangATL said: We basically wasted money extending Ty and signing 2 guards in the offseason Strongly disagree. Having depth on the OL is something this team has always needed. I'm sick of watching Matt run for his life. This is a beautiful thing, to me, at least. rugger8, JDaveG, octoslash and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
falconidae 21,327 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 37 minutes ago, FalconsIn2020 said: You can’t build a team scarred. With regards to OL, we did just that. Overkill. 58 million allocated to the OL next year is just way, way too much Thats enough for 10 million apiece for each starter plus 8 million left over for the backups Jake 15 Mack 10.5 Brown 6.5 Ty 5.75 Carp 5.2 Linds 3.3 Caleb 2.3 That's 48 mil, is my math off or where did I miss another 10 mil in 2020 cap? shock and Tim Mazetti 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconFan13 1,626 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 1 hour ago, FalconsIn2020 said: If a B+ line can’t be built for 35-40 million then there is an evaluation or scheme problems Who the **** wants a B+ line? I want an A+ line and will settle for B+ other places like TE, WR, RB, and LB. Flyin' In DC 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shock 2,287 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 1 hour ago, falconidae said: Jake 15 Mack 10.5 Brown 6.5 Ty 5.75 Carp 5.2 Linds 3.3 Caleb 2.3 That's 48 mil, is my math off or where did I miss another 10 mil in 2020 cap? Those numbers look good to me. And we can dump Ty if McGary takes over. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
1989Fan 16,026 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 I agree w all saying depth is important, but what is being missed is when we signed Ty, Carp and Brown we had no idea if Lindstrom and McGary would even be there In the draft. Most of our OL signings we really 2 year deals. rugger8 and Tim Mazetti 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
1989Fan 16,026 Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 7 hours ago, falconidae said: Jake 15 Mack 10.5 Brown 6.5 Ty 5.75 Carp 5.2 Linds 3.3 Caleb 2.3 That's 48 mil, is my math off or where did I miss another 10 mil in 2020 cap? Wes is 2M, not sure what the backups like Wentzel etc add up to, but I agree 58M seems like a stretch. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.