Jpizzle

Not the new Donald Trump Presidency thread

65,884 posts in this topic

23 minutes ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

We need Rand Paul's neighbor now more than ever.

Nope they were definitely saying send her back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

Looks like the first night is going to be way more interesting than the second.

201512_1112_ebfac.jpg

 

Night 1 is nice because of williamson, but Night two is clearly superior. Biden is going to come after Harris. Gabbard is going to call Biden a Warmonger. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   

1 hour ago, mdrake34 said:

I assume that, but a lot of brain wormed #Resistance liberals who think homophobia is funny and ok only when they do it have used it against all kinds of Republicans, from Trump to Lindsey. 

Whatever Lindsey does in his bedroom with another consenting adult is nobody’s business. 

The only thing that would bother me about Graham being gay is the hypocrisy of his anti-gay stances over the years.  Otherwise, I don’t care.  

Door Gunner likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GEORGIAfan said:

201512_1112_ebfac.jpg

 

Night 1 is nice because of williamson, but Night two is clearly superior. Biden is going to come after Harris. Gabbard is going to call Biden a Warmonger. 

Night 2 is Biden, Harris, and eight others that no one really cares about and failed to land anything of consequence during the first round.

Night 1 you have a couple more high profile candidates, Delaney and Hickenlooper will probably try to go after Sanders and Warren and will get slapped down again, Beto will do some cringe inducing thing, Marianne will do her moonbat thing, etc. Way more potential.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

Looks like the first night is going to be way more interesting than the second.

Only ones that should be in this are

Biden- establishment Dems

Sanders- socialist Dems

Warren- bridge between socialist and est..

Harris- Biden slayer

Gabbard- dark horse candidate

Just go ahead and start consolidating this now so that it doesn't take until the final debate to narrow it down to the ones people actually might care to hear. 

Edited by T-Falcon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, AF89 said:

@Gritzblitz 2.0 I forget if I told you already but my GSU alum aunt and uncle got a new puppy 3 three years ago and immediately named it Tyson and now they're stuck with that name

Never name pets and children after athletes (or coaches) and fictional characters until that story is finished being written should be a life lesson

I pity all the poor young girls whose parents named them Daenerys. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Gritzblitz 2.0 said:

I guess it's not as bad as naming it VanGorder.

I have the same philosophy about player jerseys. I feel strange wearing another dude's name on my back anyway, but if I do it's pretty much a retired Hall of Famer. Never a current player. 

 

Last jersey that I bought was a Vick jersey and I wore it at least three times a week in grad school.  Then the Vick thing happened.  So I would put it on my Springer Spaniel and walk her around the park with the Vick jersey...to be ironic and edgy.

Gritzblitz 2.0 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, T-Falcon said:

Nope they were definitely saying send her back

You need to get your ears checked, dude.  I listened to the video after Hannity’s comment and I clearly heard them chanting, “we respectfully disagree with her but we value her right to criticize the government and we value her right to free speech.”

JFC, liberals make everything about race.  ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Leon Troutsky said:

You need to get your ears checked, dude.  I listened to the video after Hannity’s comment and I clearly heard them chanting, “we respectfully disagree with her but we value her right to criticize the government and we value her right to free speech.”

JFC, liberals make everything about race.  ;)

:lol::lol:

Leon Troutsky likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

Just looking over all those inconsequential candidates again makes me more annoyed that they didn't let Gravel in. At least he'd shake things up.

I agree, but is there anything recent from Gravel in public other than the tweets from his rude teens? 

I mean the dude is 89 years old. How quick on his feet can he be at this point?

Sn4tteRBoxXeR likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Gritzblitz 2.0 said:

I agree, but is there anything recent from Gravel in public other than the tweets from his rude teens? 

I mean the dude is 89 years old. How quick on his feet can he be at this point?

Totally agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, T-Falcon said:

Let's all just be honest 

2020 is going to be Warren v Trump  or Biden v Trump unless something crazy happens.

Harris definitely is a possibility

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sn4tteRBoxXeR said:

Harris definitely is a possibility

Not likely

She's not the establishment candidate

She's not the socialist candidates

She's not the bridge between the two candidate

She's not a dark horse candidate

Her role will be the Biden slayer then she will disappear to the back of the crowd as Warren takes it or the dark horse candidate passes by the rest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, T-Falcon said:

Not likely

She's not the establishment candidate

She's not the socialist candidates

She's not the bridge between the two candidate

She's not a dark horse candidate

Her role will be the Biden slayer then she will disappear to the back of the crowd as Warren takes it or the dark horse candidate passes by the rest.

Dude you are not an accurate predictor of who will be the Democratic Nominee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sn4tteRBoxXeR said:

Dude you are not an accurate predictor of who will be the Democratic Nominee

Is that so?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

Night 2 is Biden, Harris, and eight others that no one really cares about and failed to land anything of consequence during the first round.

Night 1 you have a couple more high profile candidates, Delaney and Hickenlooper will probably try to go after Sanders and Warren and will get slapped down again, Beto will do some cringe inducing thing, Marianne will do her moonbat thing, etc. Way more potential.

Castro ripped Beto was way more must watch than Delaney and Hickenlooper getting slapped down in debate 1.

Booker went after Biden 1st. Harris stole his moment. Castro, Booker, and Yang need a good debate performance to make it to the third debate, so expect a fight from them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, T-Falcon said:

Not likely

She's not the establishment candidate

She's not the socialist candidates

She's not the bridge between the two candidate

She's not a dark horse candidate

Her role will be the Biden slayer then she will disappear to the back of the crowd as Warren takes it or the dark horse candidate passes by the rest.

What's going to  determine who is the nominee is how well they do in the debates and which are the early primary/voting states. Harris has shown that she's both willing to effectively attack her peers as well as "prosecute" a case against Trump. I don't want her to win, but I'm not going to let that blind me from seeing her momentum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, T-Falcon said:

Not likely

She's not the establishment candidate

She's not the socialist candidates

She's not the bridge between the two candidate

She's not a dark horse candidate

Her role will be the Biden slayer then she will disappear to the back of the crowd as Warren takes it or the dark horse candidate passes by the rest.

Harris can recreate the Obama coalition of white liberals and AA voters to win the nomination. And socialists are only a very tiny fraction of the party. You do not need their support to win a nomination. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sn4tteRBoxXeR said:

What's going to  determine who is the nominee is how well they do in the debates and which are the early primary/voting states. Harris has shown that she's both willing to effectively attack her peers as well as "prosecute" a case against Trump. I don't want her to win, but I'm not going to let that blind me from seeing her momentum.

That's now how the Democratic nomination works. The super delegates and consolidating power have as much influence or more as the debates. It's my greatest complaint with super delegates. Without them Bernie would have won vs Hillary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GEORGIAfan said:

Harris can recreate the Obama coalition of white liberals and AA voters to win the nomination. And socialists are only a very tiny fraction of the party. You do not need their support to win a nomination. 

They are a growing element within the party you cannot discount without a tea party like rebellion.

The way she rose up through politics will sink her in the general. She's not a female Obama. He was hope and change. She's not

Edited by T-Falcon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now