Jpowers

Not the new Donald Trump Presidency thread

31,050 posts in this topic

Can we please screen shot this page where everyone on the left and right are all on the same page on something 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least she attacked the progressive freshmen for voting against the concentration camp funding bill instead of doing something useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Legendary SB said:

Hmm just in the last couple of days I've seen Boner and PG talking about burning US flags.  

But they're cool since they are on your side right?

Guess when push comes to shove you don't stand up for your country after all.

You are absolutely the last person on here that can have a point of view about how anyone stands up for their country, you brave keyboard commando.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Legendary SB said:

So the First Amendment applies to Twitter?  Better tell Twitter that as they have banned and shadow banned a large number of conservatives.  

It doesn't apply to Twitter. It applies to Trump because it is used as federal communication. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Legendary SB said:

So the First Amendment applies to Twitter?  Better tell Twitter that as they have banned and shadow banned a large number of conservatives.  

The First Amendment applies when twitter is used by government officials to communicate official government statements and policies.  It doesn’t apply to private individuals.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Legendary SB said:

Hmm just in the last couple of days I've seen Boner and PG talking about burning US flags.  

But they're cool since they are on your side right?

Guess when push comes to shove you don't stand up for your country after all.

Sorry I'm not PC enough for you.

Leon Troutsky and Serge like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Legendary SB said:

The conservatives who were banned and shadow banned only talked about "matters of public concern" which was the reasoning given in the decision.  

They are not government officials, chucklehead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Legendary SB said:

So the First Amendment applies to Twitter?  Better tell Twitter that as they have banned and shadow banned a large number of conservatives.  

Twitter is a private company so therefore private companies can set whatever rules they wish regarding speech on their property and within their domain. So as a private company, they don't have to put up with conservative BS, lies and racism.

Wah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Legendary SB said:

Says the guy supporting the party of slavery.  

I hope that next year Trump gives Democrats their biggest loss since 1865.

Wait, I thought the South were the victims of the Civil War. What changed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Legendary SB said:

Says the guy supporting the party of slavery.  

I hope that next year Trump gives Democrats their biggest loss since 1865.

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I learned something today. Some things you just don't know you don't know.

 

Just "chilling" like that for entire 15 minutes I was there.

 

h2RWMcwh.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Legendary SB said:

Says the guy supporting the party of slavery.  

I hope that next year Trump gives Democrats their biggest loss since 1865.

LOL. And you claim blacks live in the past.

Wah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Legendary SB said:

Pretty sure you were staring at turtles doing the nasty.

I'm aware of that but I I had no idea that was how they did it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GEORGIAfan said:

:argh:

I'm sure you're all sitting there asking yourselves, "Why doesn't he spend that money on local and state races? ****, why not on House and Senate races?"

What naive fools! That $100 million is much more wisely spent getting this chuckle**** around 1% support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

As long as you are of legal age and the participants are, what's the problem? This should be as legal as prostitution. Dayum Puritan's. 

This position,(and several other related ones) I Can agree with you on. :rolleyes:

WhenFalconsWin likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Jpowers said:

So I learned something today. Some things you just don't know you don't know.

 

Just "chilling" like that for entire 15 minutes I was there.

 

h2RWMcwh.jpg

Turtle porn......

ClutteredAdolescentIslandwhistler-small.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The Legendary SB said:

 

 

gettyimages-919094590.jpg

Thank you for providing information to Attorney Edwards and helping Epstein's victims Mr. President!

This isn't directly solely at Trump, but also anyone who knew what Epstein was doing - why not report him to the authorities?  If he kicked him out of Mar-A-Lago for attacking an underage girl, why didn't he call the FBI or at least local police immediately?  Assuming that's when the falling out happened, that's 2004 - and he only offers that to an attorney 5 years later? 

Again, this isn't R vs D - this is ruling class vs. everyone else. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Statick said:

Twitter is a private company so therefore private companies can set whatever rules they wish regarding speech on their property and within their domain. So as a private company, they don't have to put up with conservative BS, lies and racism.

Wah.

You can thank the President for the FCC treating the Internet like Title 1 information services.  #promiseskept

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Legendary SB said:

I think it's obvious that Trump knew Epstein was up to no good.  The extent of which I don't know.  Whatever he knew he told Attorney Bradley Edwards in 2009.  It's speculation as to what he told Edwards. 

That's not my point.  Trump says he had a falling out with Epstein 15 years ago - roughly 2004.  He presumably tells Edwards, because Edwards put it in a public court filing, that Epstein got kicked out of Mar-A-Lago for assaulting an underage girl.  We don't know when that happened (I haven't read the actual court filing - it may or may not specify a date or even year). 

So why wait to tell Edwards in 2009 when faced with a subpoena?  Why not contact law enforcement sooner? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now