Jpizzle

Not the new Donald Trump Presidency thread

86,990 posts in this topic

6 minutes ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

Many of them (Lemmings) are equipped with half a brain...take @Big_Dog for instance...:slick:

WFW = Brainwashed to the maximum. Feels only his cult leader can save us. :shrug:

Scrunchomarx likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Big_Dog said:

WFW = Brainwashed to the maximum.

Half of WFW brain would make you an Einstein, Squirrely Bob.

I want to see a movie with the mrs, today Gramps, best recommendation? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

Half of WFW brain would make you an Einstein, Squirrely Bob.

I want to see a movie with the mrs, today Gramps, best recommendation? 

Downhill was a good see yesterday. Julia Louie Dreyfus did a super job as a pizzed off wife. Will Farrell played a straight roll which was odd. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Big_Dog said:

Downhill was a good see yesterday. Julia Louie Dreyfus did a super job as a pizzed off wife. Will Farrell played a straight roll which was odd. 

I'll watch a trailer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Billy Ocean said:

 

 

That entire situation was hilarious in how transparent it was.

1. Get CAP/DNC affiliated union leadership to put Sanders and M4A on blast.

2. Parade the same propagandist pundits to declare that this proves that Sanders and M4A are actually anti-union.

3. The usual marks parrot those talking points.

4. Union leadership announce they're going to endorse a candidate.

5. Rank and file members of that same union issue a statement that they support Sanders and M4A, firing a warning shot of an imminent revolt against leadership.

6. Union leadership backtracks and announces that they endorse "their values."

7. Pundits and marks immediately abandon the Sanders and M4A are anti-union talking points, instead start proclaiming that Sanders supporters are being mean to them.

Door Gunner likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you go to community meetings about crime in the area, what does everyone demand? More policemen on patrol. Bloomberg was criticized for the same thing when he added more police to a crime ridden black neighborhood. :shrug: 

Ya can't win these debates folks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

That entire situation was hilarious in how transparent it was.

1. Get CAP/DNC affiliated union leadership to put Sanders and M4A on blast.

2. Parade the same propagandist pundits to declare that this proves that Sanders and M4A are actually anti-union.

3. The usual marks parrot those talking points.

4. Union leadership announce they're going to endorse a candidate.

5. Rank and file members of that same union issue a statement that they support Sanders and M4A, firing a warning shot of an imminent revolt against leadership.

6. Union leadership backtracks and announces that they endorse "their values."

7. Pundits and marks immediately abandon the Sanders and M4A are anti-union talking points, instead start proclaiming that Sanders supporters are being mean to them.

37403-02_kft_ignite_ml_80ct_ctn_eileen_1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

It's the Drudge Report so take it with a grain of salt, but this is the only scenario that would compel me to vote for Trump.

Trump/Rubio, Trump/Giuliani, Trump/DeVos...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Psychic Gibbon said:

Why would I cry about it? It was a perfect encapsulation of the Dem establishment losing control.

Cry?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Psychic Gibbon said:

Old liberal likes racist policing.

News at 11.

We’re talking about Terry stops.  Tons of legal reasons to stop someone: obstruction of streets, loitering, vagrancy, trespassing.  Say no to hooliganism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Red&Black said:

We’re talking about Terry stops.  Tons of legal reasons to stop someone: obstruction of streets, loitering, vagrancy, trespassing.  Say no to hooliganism.

Agreed.  The idea that people could walk around in public without government interference is laughable to me.

AF89, Serge, Jpizzle and 6 others like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now