Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
SkerFalcon8710

TD called it

26 posts in this topic

Just now, SkerFalcon8710 said:

A run on OTs...

 

TD got his OT and OG. Not looking like either would be there at 45 

He was right on the money on this one and i wasn't quite sure it was gonna happen his inside info is strong.

Malachore, gazoo, Drew4719 and 3 others like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SkerFalcon8710 said:

A run on OTs...

 

TD got his OT and OG. Not looking like either would be there at 45 

Sure seems to be the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we trade back in tonight, probably won’t until midnight.   Take your wife/girl out tonight and then hang out by TV tomorrow 

Ovie_Lover likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, SkerFalcon8710 said:

A run on OTs...

 

TD got his OT and OG. Not looking like either would be there at 45 

Yep.

We got our guy and CAN STILL get back into round 3 to recoup that cost of getting "OUR GUY" instead of sitting at 45 and wondering why another Holmes was taken.

:tiphat:

gazoo likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure the draft haters can bring to consciousness the amount of time our scouting department spent on looking at OL.

The idea that we would draft a RT that “everyone knows would have been there later” or can be described as poorly as some pundit claims is absurd. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SkerFalcon8710 said:

4 OTs taken before 45 

Yep, and meanwhile CBs are falling. First one went at 30 lol.

We can go snag at DE or CB in round 3 if we want. Watch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, gazoo said:

I am not sure the draft haters can bring to consciousness the amount of time our scouting department spent on looking at OL.

The idea that we would draft a RT that “everyone knows would have been there later” or can be described as poorly as some pundit claims is absurd. 

We got mindless, emo statements.

People comparing our picks to mocks and random scouts; cherry picked to negative narratives, instead of paying attention to what the draft is showing you.

rugger8, vitaman and gazoo like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly drafting a tackle made up for drafting a ****** guard at 14..but in the end we still spent a ton of money on guards and then drafted a guard way to high..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TRUju2111 said:

Honestly drafting a tackle made up for drafting a ****** guard at 14..but in the end we still spent a ton of money on guards and then drafted a guard way to high..

So why is it OK to draft a Dt at 14, ****, even trade up to take one, but drafting the guy in charge of stopping said Dt at 14 is just way too high?? 

Explain the logic in that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TRUju2111 said:

Honestly drafting a tackle made up for drafting a ****** guard at 14..but in the end we still spent a ton of money on guards and then drafted a guard way to high..

The guard at 14 is a solid pick.. Mcgary is a shot in the dark and needs alot of coaching.. Actually curious about Gono's status.. Isnt looking good that he'll be around long enough to develop 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, SkerFalcon8710 said:

4 OTs taken before 45 

Yep. Once I let our pick stew for a minute, I realized right after we picked Chris, other teams started making a run for OT's.

Ergo Proxy likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, FalconFanSince1969 said:

So why is it OK to draft a Dt at 14, ****, even trade up to take one, but drafting the guy in charge of stopping said Dt at 14 is just way too high?? 

Explain the logic in that. 

And the #1 OG in the Draft > the 4th or 5th DT???

:ninja:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, FalconFanSince1969 said:

So why is it OK to draft a Dt at 14, ****, even trade up to take one, but drafting the guy in charge of stopping said Dt at 14 is just way too high?? 

Explain the logic in that. 

Lol explain the logic of most teams front office in the NFL, most highly paid draft experts and 75% of fans that actually follow the draft. Why the **** does popcorn pop?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TRUju2111 said:

Honestly drafting a tackle made up for drafting a ****** guard at 14..but in the end we still spent a ton of money on guards and then drafted a guard way to high..

A ton of money?  Some yes a ton, no.  First we grip about no depth, now we have depth on OL.  We got the #1 Guard, and swooped in on our RT. We fixed the OL in one season...  Gezz,,, if Moses parted the Red Sea, some would complain about the fish being in the way...

NeonDeion likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TRUju2111 said:

Lol explain the logic of most teams front office in the NFL, most highly paid draft experts and 75% of fans that actually follow the draft. Why the **** does popcorn pop?

So no real answer just useless babbling? Exactly what I expected. 

Total Package likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, citsalp said:

A ton of money?  Some yes a ton, no.  First we grip about no depth, now we have depth on OL.  We got the #1 Guard, and swooped in on our RT. We fixed the OL in one season...  Gezz,,, if Moses parted the Red Sea, some would complain about the fish being in the way...

We are paying a dude 6mpy to ride the pine, no question that is a ton of money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, FalconFanSince1969 said:

So no real answer just useless babbling? Exactly what I expected. 

Lol what more do you need bro..dudes paid millons of dollars to do there thing agree with me, you running on 28-3 coat tails brah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TRUju2111 said:

We are paying a dude 6mpy to ride the pine, no question that is a ton of money

no they aren't. Fusco [ probably cut] 4.7, Brown 4.3. Carpenter 2.85, Sambrillo 3.25, Wes, 2.05 none of them are making 6 mil a year. Good bet Fusco and Wes are gone this year. Smbraillo next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SkerFalcon8710 said:

Get your facts straight 

none of them are being paid 6m to ride pine

Im sorry..18m over 3 years, whatever his cap hit is, jumps next year and its guranteed..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0