Pass interference replay won’t work

[2_legit_2_legit_2_quit 1,589]

There is legitimately pass interference on almost every play in the NFL to some degree. 

If they make that reviewable, coaches could potentially call it on every play and win. This would slow the game down to a snails pace. It would be like challenging holds at the line of scrimmage.

i just don’t see it working.

[falconsd56 15,620]

1 minute ago, 2_legit_2_legit_2_quit said:

There is legitimately pass interference on almost every play in the NFL to some degree. 

If they make that reviewable, coaches could potentially call it on every play and win. This would slow the game down to a snails pace. It would be like challenging holds at the line of scrimmage.

i just don’t see it working.

While I'll agree with the premise the argument.... I don't think that it will slow things down that much because coaches only have three challenges for the game now....and that is assuming they win both of their previous challenges.

If you make a pass interference reviewable they would just have another option to use those challenges for..I do wonder where where do you draw the line? Is it just pass interference? Will illegal contact be reviewable??  how about offensive holding? We see a ton of blatant holds that never get called so why should those not be reviewable if you're going to review pass interference?

And will that really change anything? I mean look back to the very first game of the season and the sliding catch Julio made... Review didn't help that.... They still got the call wrong.

 

[Jpg428gggg 447]

10 minutes ago, 2_legit_2_legit_2_quit said:

There is legitimately pass interference on almost every play in the NFL to some degree. 

If they make that reviewable, coaches could potentially call it on every play and win. This would slow the game down to a snails pace. It would be like challenging holds at the line of scrimmage.

i just don’t see it working.

I really hope they don’t put in instant replay for penalties. You can find a penalty on every play if you look hard enough.

[2_legit_2_legit_2_quit 1,589]

10 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

While I'll agree with the premise the argument.... I don't think that it will slow things down that much because coaches only have three challenges for the game now....and that is assuming they win both of their previous challenges.

If you make a pass interference reviewable they would just have another option to use those challenges for..I do wonder where where do you draw the line? Is it just pass interference? Will illegal contact be reviewable??  how about offensive holding? We see a ton of blatant holds that never get called so why should those not be reviewable if you're going to review pass interference?

And will that really change anything? I mean look back to the very first game of the season and the sliding catch Julio made... Review didn't help that.... They still got the call wrong.

 

Also, what if Peyton had used his three challenges by the time of the infamous no call? Would everybody be screaming that we need more challenges? Where does it end?

[falconsd56 15,620]

2 minutes ago, 2_legit_2_legit_2_quit said:

Also, what if Peyton had used his three challenges by the time of the infamous no call? Would everybody be screaming that we need more challenges? Where does it end?

No Doubt. I hate this expression...... but it is a slippery slope

[falconsd56 15,620]

13 minutes ago, Jpg428gggg said:

I really hope they don’t put in instant replay for penalties. You can find a penalty on every play if you look hard enough.

Yep... if you looked at just the Saints secondary every game you can probably find two or three pass interference calls that were not called...At least

[Jesus 14,652]

Fix overtime first. Give both teams a shot in the extra period. The whole game is built around game and play management. It isn’t fair that the coin flip decides who wins the game. Now I know it doesn’t quite matter in this game because Brees made a boner of a throw, but still.

[FalconinPA 10,676]

3 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

Yep... if you looked at just the Saints secondary every game you can probably find two or three pass interference calls that were not called...At least

This. They are horrible, and PI is the only way they can keep up.

[Dutty Ole Bird 5,903]

I find it ironic that moron stain fans after years of winning countless games with the saints pass interference special now want their games called fairly and cry foul when they are on the receiving end.

Well let's hope Julio doesn't get tackled NFL blitz style next team when we go to the mardi gras dome. 

[LightningDawg58 1,115]

Maybe Im in the minority but I really think College Football got it right for both Replays and Overtime. Coaches shouldn’t have to strategize over whether the officials did their jobs or not. All questionable plays should be automatically reviewed. No need to review non calls.

Edited January 22 by LightningDawg58

[octoslash 9,531]

Each coach gets two penalty challenges per game.

Boom. 

[theDIRTYcode 1,979]

Wont be popular, but I still think college has it right.

[⚡Slumerican⚡ 3,174]

Everyone acts like the guy would have caught the ball of he wasnt touched.. Let it go, we have more post on the Falcons forum about the Saints then they do. 

[caponine 3,710]

3 minutes ago, ⚡Slumerican⚡ said:

Everyone acts like the guy would have caught the ball of he wasnt touched.. Let it go, we have more post on the Falcons forum about the Saints then they do. 

Saint’s live inside this board’s heads rent free. 

[JayOzOne 14,313]

30 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

Yep... if you looked at just the Saints secondary every game you can probably find two or three pass interference calls that were not called...At least

Lattimore is good but he's handsy like Revis used to be. I'll bet money they don't put replay in for PI. If they do, then certain standout CBs won't stand out.

They talked about this on all of the network news broadcasts this evening. Didn't mention Bowman's play on Roddy once in 2012.

[The O.D.B 3,569]

1 hour ago, 2_legit_2_legit_2_quit said:

There is legitimately pass interference on almost every play in the NFL to some degree. 

If they make that reviewable, coaches could potentially call it on every play and win. This would slow the game down to a snails pace. It would be like challenging holds at the line of scrimmage.

i just don’t see it working.

In another thread I proposed a single call/no-call challenge flag, it would be non-refundable, as in you don't get it back even if you're right and you can only use it in the 4th quarter. Basically, you get one chance to save your game from a single bad call. that's the only way I can see it enacted without being abused. 

[pearljamnash13 37]

They have pass interference challenges in the CFL...

[falconsd56 15,620]

26 minutes ago, JayOzOne said:

Lattimore is good but he's handsy like Revis used to be. I'll bet money they don't put replay in for PI. If they do, then certain standout CBs won't stand out.

They talked about this on all of the network news broadcasts this evening. Didn't mention Bowman's play on Roddy once in 2012.

Imagine the legion of boom if potential interference calls could be challenged??

[falconsd56 15,620]

Just now, pearljamnash13 said:

They have pass interference challenges in the CFL...

And they drink moose piss that they disguise as beer......lets not go down that path!

[pearljamnash13 37]

2 minutes ago, falconsd56 said:

And they drink moose piss that they disguise as beer......lets not go down that path!

I'm not advocating for PI challenges. I'm just saying that they have them. We'd probably have been in the Super Bowl 2012 had they been able to review it. In this instance I'm glad they can't because it's the Taints. However, it is an option, and it works fairly well up there.

[A-TowN.- 4,181]

I think one penalty challenge per game is okay. But only if you specify the penalty (like WR #11 was inferred with). 

I just think it’s incredibly dumb to have blatant missed calls (like Julio in Seattle in 2016) and there’s nothing that can be done. It’s obvious to everyone in the stadium, including refs, and we just let it go? 

I hate the Saints, but man the NFL has some weird rules. 

[WPGFALCONSFAN 284]

As someone who lives in Canada and watches both the CFL and NFL, please so not put challenges in! It slows the game down and takes away from the flow of the game. Every play where a guy even gets touched or breathed on is a flag in the CFL and coaches just throw challenges on anything to maybe get a ref to call something. Sure you may take away those blatant missed calls, but then you'll have weak calls made or refs having to make judgement calls on what is and isn't enough for pi. Basically you open up a can or worms and cheapen the game further in my opinion. 

Maybe 1 challenge a game or something, but not what the CFL does. Makes the CFL even harder to watch. Haha

Edited January 22 by WPGFALCONSFAN

[JayOzOne 14,313]

1 hour ago, falconsd56 said:

Imagine the legion of boom if potential interference calls could be challenged??

Remember Sherman grabbing Julio at the end of the game in 2016?

[falconsd56 15,620]

1 minute ago, JayOzOne said:

Remember Sherman grabbing Julio at the end of the game in 2016?

How could i forget.....sherman had flawless technique....it was be perfect demonstration of how to put someone in the crossface chicken wing!

[CaliFalcons 180]

5 hours ago, Jesus said:

Fix overtime first. Give both teams a shot in the extra period. The whole game is built around game and play management. It isn’t fair that the coin flip decides who wins the game. Now I know it doesn’t quite matter in this game because Brees made a boner of a throw, but still.

Yeah I wished they would change OT like college football.