Jump to content

Falcons look awesome at TE next year! Pro Bowl Hooper and emerging Saubert


gazoo

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, gazoo said:

You are saying coaches believe Hooper can’t play, so they fired Harmon? That is nonsensical. 

 

What exactly do you expect from a 2 year, bottom of 5th round draft pick TE out of a small,school like Drake in his second season?

i look for progress, I  watch his snaps to see if he is putting himself in the right position to make his blocks and how good he is once engaging the defender. I look to see if he knows what he is doing out there or looks lost.

Some of you guys expectations seem to be if he didn’t have a 1000 yard receiving season with 10 TDs he hasn’t done anything. 

Im looking for progress, and I’m seeing it. I also see a lot of upside for. TE who was #2 in the nation in receiving yards and TDs.  Blocking is coming along nicely, but he has to get that down before he can play more snaps.

The Falcons didn’t play Saubert 187 snaps on offense for nothing. Many here were insisting Josh Perkins was going to stick and Saubert get cut, and Perkins only had 74 snaps on offense previous year.  

Dude no one was talking about Perkins, it was Paulsen who played 362 snaps, get your head out of your ***.

Perkins wasn't even on the team in 2018 except for in JANUARY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

13 minutes ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

I think the Falcons looked at the position and weren’t satisfied with how that position group played.  

TE is really a watered down position right now...particularly in the NFC.  There’s Ertz/Kittle and then a huge drop off.  So being named a Pro Bowl alternate is largely because he was shade better than other JAG types who played 16 games (Trey Burton, zkyle Rudolph, Jimmy Graham) and players who produced more on a per game basis had in-season injuries (Evan Engram, OJ Howard).

His production was pedestrian.  Based on what you saw in 2019, would we want to commit $9M/year on a long term deal?  As for Saubert, I didn’t expect a 1000 yard season, but I did expect a 100 yard one...

 

Saubert isn't what y'all think he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

I think the Falcons looked at the position and weren’t satisfied with how that position group played.  

I think Falcons let Harmon go because they didn’t like something they saw in his coaching.

You are implying, or somehow suggesting, falaciously, the reason they let Harmon go has something to do with them not thinking their TEs are not good.  

It would seem far more the case they fired Harmon becuase they feel Saubert and Hooper have the talent to be way better than they are now with better coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waiting for saubert is like waiting for Lamar Holmes because they have ideal physique for playing the position. Saubeet was hyped up in off season and hasn’t shown anything. 

Hooper took a big step forward and hope he gets even better. Falcons should look for a veteran TE if they can find cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, KRUNKuno said:

Y’all really gotta stop hyping hooper up.  He’s C list.

Coaches and Matt Ryan are saying Hooper still has a ton of upside, so while you are looking in the rear view mirror, my post is about the 2019 Season.

There is a reason Harmon is fired.coaches we a lot of promise in our TEs that Harmon wasn’t getting out of them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, gazoo said:

I think Falcons let Harmon go because they didn’t like something they saw in his coaching.

You are implying, or somehow suggesting, falaciously, the reason they let Harmon go has something to do with them not thinking their TEs are not good.  

It would seem far more the case they fired Harmon becuase they feel Saubert and Hooper have the talent to be way better than they are now with better coaching.

That’s likely the case...whether they are better or not remains to be seen.  

Ultimately, I thought Hooper’s play was awfully ‘meh’ for the most part...this season and last.  Changing up his (and Saubert’s) position coach is likely done in mind to get better play out of both (and anyone else they might acquire).  

But it’s entirely possible that this is what Hooper is...and if that’s the case, I’d pass on a long term deal for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

That’s likely the case...whether they are better or not remains to be seen.  

Ultimately, I thought Hooper’s play was awfully ‘meh’ for the most part...this season and last.  Changing up his (and Saubert’s) position coach is likely done in mind to get better play out of both (and anyone else they might acquire).  

But it’s entirely possible that this is what Hooper is...and if that’s the case, I’d pass on a long term deal for him.

Can’t imagine what you think you’re seeing. Hooper improved greatly from 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

That’s likely the case...whether they are better or not remains to be seen.  

Ultimately, I thought Hooper’s play was awfully ‘meh’ for the most part...this season and last.  Changing up his (and Saubert’s) position coach is likely done in mind to get better play out of both (and anyone else they might acquire).  

But it’s entirely possible that this is what Hooper is...and if that’s the case, I’d pass on a long term deal for him.

I largely agree Hoopers play was mostly “meh” for 2018 Despite making it to a Pro Bowl alternate. He got 30 1st downs on 71 receptions, he’s getting a lot of tough yards helping us keep chains moving. Not Sports Center highlights, but still productive. More importantly, still necessary.   I doubt he will ever be a 1200 yard, 12 TD receiving  TE. There aren’t really a lot of them out there.

Will he ever get better? Coaches and Matt Ryan sure think so, they are saying they think Hooper still has a lot of upside. 

Whether Hooper gets a LOT better or just a little better, Hooper is still valuable to this team as a complete TE, and that becomes even more so if Saubert continues developing and also becomes a #2 complete TE capable of getting 250 yards, a few TDs and several 1st down catches as he blocks for our running game. 

Two complete TEs on field at same time, even if they are both just average, are more than twice the problem for a defense than if just one average complete TE  is on the field. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

But he was pretty bad in 2017...

Bad for a second year, 3rd round TE? Few TEs drafted in round 3 do much better in their second years.

I don’t feel like digging around to do the research, but I’ll bet you Hoopers 2017 production is in the higher tier of all the Taes drafted in round 3 over the last 10 years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

But he was pretty bad in 2017...

He was inconsistent in ‘17 with some drops, not unusual for young TE’s. In 2018 he took major steps forward. Still room to grow, but Not sure why you or anymore else would complain about his progress last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Vandy said:

He was inconsistent in ‘17 with some drops, not unusual for young TE’s. In 2018 he tooked major steps forward. Still room to grow, but Not sure why anymore would complain about his progress last season.

Typical TATF. Once a player is in the dog house it’s hard to change the perception. Hooper was one of the most improved player on a roster when most players took a big step back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Vandy said:

He was inconsistent in ‘17 with some drops, not unusual for young TE’s. In 2018 he tooked major steps forward. Still room to grow, but Not sure why anymore would complain about his progress last season.

Title of the thread: Falcons look awesome at TE next year...

I said Hooper has been ‘OK’...but at current levels of play/production isn’t worth paying market value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, gazoo said:

Coaches and Matt Ryan are saying Hooper still has a ton of upside, so while you are looking in the rear view mirror, my post is about the 2019 Season.

There is a reason Harmon is fired.coaches we a lot of promise in our TEs that Harmon wasn’t getting out of them.

 

I think we’re drafting a TE in round 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

Title of the thread: Falcons look awesome at TE next year...

I said Hooper has been ‘OK’...but at current levels of play/production isn’t worth paying market value.

To each his own. I personally think Hooper is progressing nicely. Sure wish Beasley, Riley, et al would show his kind of growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KRUNKuno said:

I think we’re drafting a TE in round 4

What kind of production would you expect this 4th round TE you suggest would be picked to get in 2019?  What about 2020? 

Pleae give me your general idea of expectations on this 4th round TE pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

He’ll come up for contract extension in 2020.

Would you re-sign him at $9-10M/year based on how he’s played to date?

No, nor do I believe he would ask me to pay him that based on how he’s played to date. 

Plus we just finished 2018 season, so I think ...with respect...you’re a little ahead of yourself if worried about his next contract right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...