Jump to content

Not A Fan, But PFF Says We Had A Decent O-Line


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, falconidae said:

Yeah, you're right, That's an exaggeration,should have said, "in part, because of lack of Oline depth" I do think though that , if the Oline had stayed healthy, Falcons win.

I got it man, just messing ...:)

 but am still pizzed at coaches too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

7 hours ago, g-dawg said:

the only time anyone ever cites PFF - is when it fits the agenda they are trying to sell.

I wasn't citing PFF, I posted it. Its different. I hate PFF and everyone knows it. Its not even a secret. We did have a top 10 line though.Nothing I say matters. We are likely to get Wynn and blame whoever else, or pretend its much better no matter what. I personally don't give a crap at this point. It all matters not without a SB and I don't see that happening for a few more years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said a week or so ago we had a top 7/8 line and that’s without the aide of PFF and using my eyes. All you have to do is look at how the running backs played. Like I said before if the backs production dipped then you would’ve had a bad line. Offensive lines are measured by how well you can run the ball. We averaged about the same last season running the ball as we did the SB season. Matt was sacked/hit about the same as well. Ppl are blaming the drop in offensive performance on line play but that ain’t it. We simply just didn’t execute on offense from a player standpoint. Sark being new WAS an issue to some degree but the players left ALOT of plays on the field that were well drawn up plays but poorly executed. Then the drops added on top. Wes started out ruff but smoothed out as the year progressed. It’s funny  because you can have a line made up of 5 pro bowlers but you will STILL have a weak link along the line. Weak link doesn’t mean WEAK. It’s just the weakest of a strong unit. Last year Chester was the weak link. Now y’all miss him?? Lol. Did y’all forget that Chester and Wes was in a battle that came down to the wire?? If wes gives us Chester type production that’s a top 5 line. If they stay healthy. We need DEPTH but stop thinking Wes Is up to be replaced already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheFatboi said:

And he wasn’t as bad as ppl say. He performed like a first year starter to me and got better as the year wore on. Heck he even made PFF as a top OG with an 80+ rating. 

You talking about THIS Wes Schweitzer? 54th best guard in the league?6d9S0mp.png

And they also say we were 12th best in pass blocking and 15th in on pressures/attempt..then how are we the #2 offensive line in the league?

I'm not saying they're wrong lol but PFF can be very confusing at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheFatboi said:

I said a week or so ago we had a top 7/8 line and that’s without the aide of PFF and using my eyes. All you have to do is look at how the running backs played. Like I said before if the backs production dipped then you would’ve had a bad line. Offensive lines are measured by how well you can run the ball. We averaged about the same last season running the ball as we did the SB season. Matt was sacked/hit about the same as well. Ppl are blaming the drop in offensive performance on line play but that ain’t it. We simply just didn’t execute on offense from a player standpoint. Sark being new WAS an issue to some degree but the players left ALOT of plays on the field that were well drawn up plays but poorly executed. Then the drops added on top. Wes started out ruff but smoothed out as the year progressed. It’s funny  because you can have a line made up of 5 pro bowlers but you will STILL have a weak link along the line. Weak link doesn’t mean WEAK. It’s just the weakest of a strong unit. Last year Chester was the weak link. Now y’all miss him?? Lol. Did y’all forget that Chester and Wes was in a battle that came down to the wire?? If wes gives us Chester type production that’s a top 5 line. If they stay healthy. We need DEPTH but stop thinking Wes Is up to be replaced already. 

You know I hate PFF and not seeing it as a #2 anything, BUT I didn't see as a bad a line as everyone else. I have my own belief on why it "sucks" in the eyes of this fanbase, but with little movement coming in the FA and not really a lot of talent, we are about to draft yet another Guard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Knight of God said:

You know I hate PFF and not seeing it as a #2 anything, BUT I didn't see as a bad a line as everyone else. I have my own belief on why it "sucks" in the eyes of this fanbase, but with little movement coming in the FA and not really a lot of talent, we are about to draft yet another Guard. 

Facts. If we draft an OG I hope it’s the second and we grab a dawg DT in the 1st. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChickenBiscuit said:

You don't like Taven Bryan?

I do, but not as much as most people. I could be wrong. Just not a huge fan even though he leads most of my mocks. I will be happy if we get him, but I'm not seeing the JJ Watt comparison. I absolutely hate the racially motivated comparisons man. He reminds me of Sheldon Richardson really. Similar size, combine, and playing style. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Knight of God said:

You know I hate PFF and not seeing it as a #2 anything, BUT I didn't see as a bad a line as everyone else. I have my own belief on why it "sucks" in the eyes of this fanbase, but with little movement coming in the FA and not really a lot of talent, we are about to draft yet another Guard. 

Outside of Dallas, and them strictly from a talent standpoint, there are no GREAT lines.  Like ours, most have flaws.  It’s all about scheme, coaching & continuity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Knight of God said:

You know, I hope we do too, but I'm not a huge fan of them. Not even Payne. Who do you like?

I liked  Wynn at first but now there’s not really anybody I’m a fan of like that so I guess I’m with you. I personally think they like Wes but might draft a guy for competition/depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheFatboi said:

See that’s what folks don’t understand too. You can find those kinda guys as UDFA’s. Like Shraeder. Especially the way the game is now. 

I mean dude has upside, but he's not great. I am more concerned with DL, some kind of receiver, DB, and either RB or FB. I want help, but I am not against playmakers in those positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Knight of God said:

I mean dude has upside, but he's not great. I am more concerned with DL, some kind of receiver, DB, and either RB or FB. I want help, but I am not against playmakers in those positions.

See that’s my thing. Wes wasn’t so bad that we just HAVE to go OG in the 1st. I really want us to grab a DT 2X, CB, WR, LB, FB. That’s my draft wishlist. Especially if we get a OG in FA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having top athletes is good but having players that play well as a unit is 10x better. The Patriots don't always have great talent on the Oline, but I admire the way they communicate and play as a unit. That's coaching and a group that have really good affinity.

I think Garland would work out better at RG than Wes but I understand the FO likes Wes's youth. I think a bigger concern is the swing tackle, FB and a blocking TE. When Toilolo missed time with an injury the run game sucked and Coleman isn't the answer at FB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Knight of God said:

I do, but not as much as most people. I could be wrong. Just not a huge fan even though he leads most of my mocks. I will be happy if we get him, but I'm not seeing the JJ Watt comparison. I absolutely hate the racially motivated comparisons man. He reminds me of Sheldon Richardson really. Similar size, combine, and playing style. 

I’ll take Sheldon Richardson-like. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheFatboi said:

See that’s my thing. Wes wasn’t so bad that we just HAVE to go OG in the 1st. I really want us to grab a DT 2X, CB, WR, LB, FB. That’s my draft wishlist. Especially if we get a OG in FA. 

Very Similar here, although I want a Joker TE also. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Knight of God said:

My list is similar. You know I want a FS pretty bad, but that's just me. Other than that it is the same list. As for CB, I was just looking at Kevin Toliver.

 

I like him. He fits what we do. And he has that cocky attitude I like in corners that are full of confidence ala Deion, Asante, Rod Woodson, Aneas Williams, Tru and Alf etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...