Jump to content

Not A Fan, But PFF Says We Had A Decent O-Line


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Levitres injury exposed a lack of depth. I think we need to invest into our offensive line. I don’t think anyone would disagree we need more guys in the middle who can both move and run our zone schemes as well as have the strength to get some push in short yardage. It’s time to make a major investment (FA & Draft) to give the few weapons we currently have more opportunities to flourish. The road back to the Super Bowl will likely go through some monster D lines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, falconidae said:

Not with Levitre only signed for a year and Mack getting up in years- want the replacements for both on the team now, learning the system and getting stronger.

Why?  The idea for a Day 1/2 pick is to come in and compete right away?

Fact is - we drafted Sean Harlow in the 4th round with that thought in mind.  In 2018, we have one spot in flux on the OL.  As for Mack, I can see him now being year to year, but he was 2nd team All-Pro inn 2017.  Unless his performance falls off a cliff and he decides to return (not retire) he's the starting C on the 2019 Falcons.

If we need an immediate replacement for Levitre in 2019, then you can look at 1st/2nd round then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

Why?  The idea for a Day 1/2 pick is to come in and compete right away?

Fact is - we drafted Sean Harlow in the 4th round with that thought in mind.  In 2018, we have one spot in flux on the OL.  As for Mack, I can see him now being year to year, but he was 2nd team All-Pro inn 2017.  Unless his performance falls off a cliff and he decides to return (not retire) he's the starting C on the 2019 Falcons.

If we need an immediate replacement for Levitre in 2019, then you can look at 1st/2nd round then.

Don't care about what a 1st or 2nd round pick is supposed to do. Last two playoff games the falcons lost, they lost because they didn't have quality OLine depth.I want starter quality players backing up the Oline.

 

I also want the replacements for LeVitre and Mack to have time in the system before they start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, falconidae said:

Don't care about what a 1st or 2nd round pick is supposed to do. Last two playoff games the falcons lost, they lost because they didn't have quality OLine depth.I want starter quality players backing up the Oline.

 

I also want the replacements for LeVitre and Mack to have time in the system before they start.

SMH... The oline isn't plug and play (why do you think they never sub out?) The oline plays as a unit they all learn each other and get use to playing with each other. They learn weaknesses and strengths so they know who needs help and when. You don't just throw someone in and expect it to be hunky Dorie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Knight of God said:

I really hope we get a FA for the role.

In the draft I’d love to get Tyrell Crosby. Schraeder is 29 but he’s peaked and I predict a decline. He’s also a $7.75m cap hit in 2019.

Sign a decent vet, and let him and Crosby compete for G. Cut schraeder the next year, insert Crosby at RT, and if Harlow or Wes has progressed move one of them into the vacant G spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MSalmon said:

In the draft I’d love to get Tyrell Crosby. Schraeder is 29 but he’s peaked and I predict a decline. He’s also a $7.75m cap hit in 2019.

Sign a decent vet, and let him and Crosby compete for G. Cut schraeder the next year, insert Crosby at RT, and if Harlow or Wes has progressed move one of them into the vacant G spot

The more I look at it, outside of Nelson the only guys I like at all are Hernandez and Braden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, falconidae said:

Don't care about what a 1st or 2nd round pick is supposed to do. Last two playoff games the falcons lost, they lost because they didn't have quality OLine depth.I want starter quality players backing up the Oline.

 

I also want the replacements for LeVitre and Mack to have time in the system before they start.

So we’re going to draft a 2018 back-up on the OL in the 1st/2nd Round while we start Justin Hardy at WR3 and (?) next to Jarrett?

OK...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OL isn't a problem spot. People are taking games vs LA and PHI and extrapolating it into the 18 games played. Every single interior OL had issues blocking Aaron Donald and Fletcher Cox. 

Do I want them to upgrade the RG spot? Yea. I think Josh Kline would be a great signing that should be affordable and short enough to let Harlow and Schweitzer develop. Would I be mad if they rolled with Wes again? Nope. Do I think they can draft a RG? Yes. 

Jake, Andy, Mack, and Schraeder, assuming he bounces back, are strong enough to make up any slack at RG. Everybody is complaining about Wes, but he wasn't much worse than Chester was. Chester would have been abused just as bad by Donald and was abused by McCoy and Fletcher in 2016 routinely. We still balled out. 

Go get some more weapons for Matt and Sark to exploit defenses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raysnill1 said:

I'm just loving how Wes doesn't have the capability to improve in folks eyes. I remember last season all we had to do was get rid of Chester and the line would be blah blah blah. now all of a sudden Chester was the man and Wes messed it up lol.

We was a liability the first 10 games but showed nice improvement the last 2 months of the year.  He was a slightly below average starting Guard by the end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheDirtyWordII said:

So we’re going to draft a 2018 back-up on the OL in the 1st/2nd Round while we start Justin Hardy at WR3 and (?) next to Jarrett?

OK...?

No, we're going to draft an Olineman to compete for the starting job this year, provide starter quality depth if he doesn't win the job this year and then, have  a year in the NFL and  a year in the system under his belt when he replaces Levitre next year.

Don't see where I said draft only Olinemen or that they can't sign a DT in FA. Use the first pick on Oline, second on Dline, or reverse it. Sign a FA DT and a FA TE/WR.

Falcon lost the super bowl because they had no depth on the Oline, lost the last game last year because they had no depth on the Oline.  I think that's worth spending a 1st or 2nd round pick on to fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, falconidae said:

No, we're going to draft an Olineman to compete for the starting job this year, provide starter quality depth if he doesn't win the job this year and then, have  a year in the NFL and  a year in the system under his belt when he replaces Levitre next year.

Don't see where I said draft only Olinemen or that they can't sign a DT in FA. Use the first pick on Oline, second on Dline, or reverse it. Sign a FA DT and a FA TE/WR.

Falcon lost the super bowl because they had no depth on the Oline, lost the last game last year because they had no depth on the Oline.  I think that's worth spending a 1st or 2nd round pick on to fix.

I hear ya man, I understand your main point....

but just to be clear....

falcons lost SB because both their OC and their HC lost their grip in 4th qtr of that game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Vandy said:

I hear ya man, I understand your main point....

but just to be clear....

falcons lost SB because both their OC and their HC lost their grip in 4th qtr of that game...

Yeah, you're right, That's an exaggeration,should have said, "in part, because of lack of Oline depth" I do think though that , if the Oline had stayed healthy, Falcons win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...