caponine Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 5 minutes ago, Vandy said: Me either...LOL, you got me on that one Cap!!! i was watching basketball during pro bowl lol I knew Neal, D. Jones, and Julio Jones went but thats all i saw lol everything else was invisible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, Fernando C. said: 32 years old... naaaa lets draft..... Omg, really? So you’d rather have a third round prospect than a proven DL starter with at least three or four years left in the tank? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, MayorWest13 said: Well the crazier the trade the better the threads, need some entertainment until the end of March. This one is actually being reported on. I see reality in this idea. Seahawks need picks. Might see Earl going away to Dallas too. It’s rebuild time in Seattle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caponine Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, MSalmon said: First and foremost you all are seriously underrating our OL. second, you have plenty of picks. Third a third and 7th is nothing for a proven upgrade from clayborn lastly, they are far worse off on OL than us I am ?? Underrating the OL ?? Qbs and Rbs were hit way too much in the backfield Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moist Words Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, MSalmon said: Omg, really? So you’d rather have a third round prospect than a proven DL starter with at least three or four years left in the tank? Defense is at the point where a proven vet here or there would definitely help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayorWest13 Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, MSalmon said: This one is actually being reported on. I see reality in this idea. Seahawks need picks. Might see Earl going away to Dallas too. It’s rebuild time in Seattle I love the idea, but a 3rd is a little high. Especially with what Quinn just went for. I'd be okay with a forth though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, Jpowers said: Defense is at the point where a proven vet here or there would definitely help. I agree. I wouldn’t give up a first or second, but a midround pick? Sure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, MayorWest13 said: I love the idea, but a 3rd is a little high. Especially with what Quinn just went for. I'd be okay with a forth though. I’d be ok with any mid round. Giving up fourth is even better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-dawg Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, MSalmon said: Omg, really? So you’d rather have a third round prospect than a proven DL starter with at least three or four years left in the tank? 3 or 4 yrs? How old is Bennett? 33? He is not a QB, Bennett is in his decline years - if not this year, then surely next. Father time is undefeated. Your 3-4 yr comment is ABSURD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, caponine said: I am ?? Underrating the OL ?? Qbs and Rbs were hit way too much in the backfield The scheme itself was a big part of problem. Look at the long developing routes and weird halfback sweep tosses. re-watch some games, it was just a learning curve. Amd there is no way were blowing up our OL and inserting multiple rookies. seattle is another level of dysfunction on their OL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caponine Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, g-dawg said: 3 or 4 yrs? How old is Bennett? 33? He is not a QB, Bennett is in his decline years - if not this year, then surely next. Father time is undefeated. Your 3-4 yr comment is ABSURD. +1, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moist Words Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, MSalmon said: I agree. I wouldn’t give up a first or second, but a midround pick? Sure Bennett and his familiarity with the system and Quinn..... it's just such a natural fit. That being said that's probably what is driving these rumors though. It's the easiest scenario to imagine so it's easy filler material for writers to run with in the off season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, g-dawg said: 3 or 4 yrs? How old is Bennett? 33? He is not a QB, Bennett is in his decline years - if not this year, then surely next. Father time is undefeated. Your 3-4 yr comment is ABSURD. Pro bowl and 8.5 sacks last year. He’s a huge upgrade from clay youre man crush on Wynn is absurd, but I don’t make fun of you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 1 minute ago, Jpowers said: Bennett and his familiarity with the system and Quinn..... it's just such a natural fit. That being said that's probably what is driving these rumors though. It's the easiest scenario to imagine so it's easy filler material for writers to run with in the off season. True. We’re also set enough with takk and Beasley to limit his touches, and DQ knows how to use him, as you pointed out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caponine Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, MSalmon said: The scheme itself was a big part of problem. Look at the long developing routes and weird halfback sweep tosses. re-watch some games, it was just a learning curve. Amd there is no way were blowing up our OL and inserting multiple rookies. seattle is another level of dysfunction on their OL Also part of the problem was lack of Fundamentals. Half the OL had a problem with leverage and balance and using hands. And why would you trade Coleman when we are trying to win a SB ? That would mess up chemistry greatly. Catching , running but please dont overlook pass blocking. You have seen what can happen. The team needs both Freeman and Coleman to win a SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, g-dawg said: 3 or 4 yrs? How old is Bennett? 33? He is not a QB, Bennett is in his decline years - if not this year, then surely next. Father time is undefeated. Your 3-4 yr comment is ABSURD. He’s also played in 16 games in every season but once since becoming a Seahawks hes 32. Not absurdly old for a pass rusher, a position that often plays well into late thirties. so if he plays three to four years, that’s far from absurd btw when did you transform into FFS1970? You don’t have to be so salty or insulting in every post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandy Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, g-dawg said: 3 or 4 yrs? How old is Bennett? 33? He is not a QB, Bennett is in his decline years - if not this year, then surely next. Father time is undefeated. Your 3-4 yr comment is ABSURD. He’s 32, and had 8.5 sacks last year... We would only keep him for a couple Years....I think he would help us get over the hump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-dawg Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 1 minute ago, MSalmon said: Pro bowl and 8.5 sacks last year. He’s a huge upgrade from clay youre man crush on Wynn is absurd, but I don’t make fun of you I am not married to “Wynn or Bust” and open to other possibilities at #26 as long as it’s not James Daniels. Yes, Bennett had 8.5 sacks last year, that doesn’t change his age. What is your definition of decline? Do you think it is 1 sack per yr? I am OK with signing Bennett but I would not trade for him - certainly not giving up a premium pick for a guy that The Seahawks might cut because they have determined he is no longer worth it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, caponine said: Also part of the problem was lack of Fundamentals. Half the OL had a problem with leverage and balance and using hands. And why would you trade Coleman when we are trying to win a SB ? That would mess up chemistry greatly. Catching , running but please dont overlook pass blocking. You have seen what can happen. The team needs both Freeman and Coleman to win a SB Agree. depends. I just don’t see teco as that power back. I think we’ve locked ourselves into one very expensive COP back already. I love teco, but trading him and a 7th for a proven pass rusher is easy for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stizz Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 I like Bennett's game but I can't get over the fact that dude is 30 plus and lied about police for social media clout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandy Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 7 minutes ago, caponine said: Also part of the problem was lack of Fundamentals. Half the OL had a problem with leverage and balance and using hands. And why would you trade Coleman when we are trying to win a SB ? That would mess up chemistry greatly. Catching , running but please dont overlook pass blocking. You have seen what can happen. The team needs both Freeman and Coleman to win a SB I hear you on Teco, it would be a difficult decision to let him go , but... Pass blocking? Neither of our RBs are very proficient in that part of the Game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, g-dawg said: I am not married to “Wynn or Bust” and open to other possibilities at #26 as long as it’s not James Daniels. Yes, Bennett had 8.5 sacks last year, that doesn’t change his age. What is your definition of decline? Do you think it is 1 sack per yr? I am OK with signing Bennett but I would not trade for him - certainly not giving up a premium pick for a guy that The Seahawks might cut because they have determined he is no longer worth it. Lol just messing with you. I haven’t really scouted Daniels. What’s the dislike? Isn’t he an OC! again, 16 games regularly played. Waiting for the cut could drive up price. Buy him for a mid and you got him, plus he lives DQ dude, he’s way better than clay, and the Seahawks are looking at rebuild. They need picks. Their secondary and OL is horrid and old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, Vandy said: I hear you on Teco, but...Pass blocking? Neither of our RBs are very proficient in that part of the Game. Great point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSalmon Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, stizz said: I like Bennett's game but I can't get over the fact that dude is 30 plus and lied about police for social media clout. Meh..DQ is great at managing personalities Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slappywhite Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 I dont think it'll take that much to get him . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.