fuego

"Steve Sarkisian was horrendous" Jason Whitlock

325 posts in this topic

6 minutes ago, MSalmon said:

I really liked Vick as an analyst. I don't think it's panic time, yet. I actually like the balanced approach, the key is will Sark let Matt take over if that approach doesn't work

I think Vick is better than I  thought he would be.  Whitlock had a couple of decent points.  It was Sark's first game, like Tony said, Ice will talk to Sark.  We'll be just fine.  On another note:  Gonzo is a physical specimen, I think he could still play.  

Vandy, capitan, MSalmon and 3 others like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, A Pimp Named Slickback™ said:

The question asked by Cowherd or whatever his name is could be asked about every team he brought up.  :shrug:

Exactly. That's just Cowturd trying to be sensational and get traffic through the site and people listening.
He's terrible and really close to be as bad as Skip Bayless.

apl2g likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the he!! is Cowturd even trying to say? "Take away every position where Atlanta has good players and are they really good?" Wtf is that?? He's such a ***** and wasn't even interested in talking about the actual game, just trying to bash the team for ALMOST losing and comparing them to the other "top" NFC teams. F him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PHALCONABERNATHY said:

What the he!! is Cowturd even trying to say? "Take away every position where Atlanta has good players and are they really good?" Wtf is that?? He's such a ***** and wasn't even interested in talking about the actual game, just trying to bash the team for ALMOST losing and comparing them to the other "top" NFC teams. F him. 

I mean why doesn't he just say "Take away all the shiny hood ornaments and what you have left?," ummm... a car that can run you over azzhat.

Tryonis and PokerSteve like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Beef said:

Take away Matt Ryan.

Take away Julio Jones.

Take away Mohamed Sanu.

Take away Taylor Gabriel.

Take away Devonta Freeman.

Take away Tevin Coleman.

Take away Austin Hooper.

Take away Jake Matthews.

Take away Alex Mack.

Take away Ryan Schraeder.

Take away Vic Beasley.

Take away Grady Jarrett.

Take away Dontari Poe.

Take away Deion Jones.

Take away DeVondre Campbell.

Take away Desmond Trufant.

Take away Robert Alford.

Take away Brian Poole.

Take away Keanu Neal.

 

And I mean... what do the Falcons REALLY have?

:lol: Good one :tiphat:

MoFalconsFan56 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about this? 
Take away all the "glamor" positions from the GB Packers.

No Nelson, no Cobb, no Martellus Bennet, no RB (cause he mentioned Coleman and Freeman) and no D. Adams and what do the Packers have?

Would Rodgers be able to still win without them and just street free agent WR and RB?

No of course not.

So why hold our team to a different standard? Because it doesn't fit the narrative, that the falcons got "lucky" last year right?

Anyone really think that GB defense is that much different from last year?

I don't, that doesn't mean they aren't healthier, they are, but where are the major difference makers on that defense?

Sure they "dominated" the Seahags O line, but really that's because they depend on R. Wilson to improvise and win all the time.

Similar to Green Bay, without Rogers, they are a 3 and 13 team right?

So why all of a sudden do we have to discount players on our roster? Again because it doesn't fit the narrative that we aren't good right?

It's lazy and biased ANALysis, that sensationalized to get attention and that's it.

Edited by Rhodaric

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dudes don't know what they're talking about. We ran no huddle plenty of times. It's how we'd go from an I formation to a 5 wide spread with the same personnel. Ryan had a lot of control at the line...he changed the call quite a few times. We ran the same offense as last year. Bears just refused to give stuff up deep majority of the game, and came up and made sure they got our guys down on the first tackle. We still had splash plays up the seams and a couple of big YAC plays. We ran bootlegs...we had a couple of stretch runs and stretch run bootlegs and RPOs. People just aren't looking at the all-22 or giving the Bears credit 

peoriabird likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

I think Vick is better than I  thought he would be.  Whitlock had a couple of decent points.  It was Sark's first game, like Tony said, Ice will talk to Sark.  We'll be just fine.  On another note:  Gonzo is a physical specimen, I think he could still play.  

Yes he is. You ever seen his workout routine? 

Recommend his exercise/nutrition book for folks who want to get their sorry azzes back in decent shape...

https://www.amazon.com/All-Pro-Diet-Tony-Gonzalez/dp/1623365252

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like how he listed the biggest strength of each team in the NFC but only wanted to point out our biggest weakness and if Rico is one of our biggest weaknesses we are doing pretty good

sandtrap likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now