Spectre

Trump - Russia Thread

2,056 posts in this topic

I like how the CIA, Obama, the "Deep State," etc., are all horrible people that lie every time they open their mouth, but they can be counted on when they say "no/I don't recall" to a negative question regarding Trump.

Edited by Spectre
Leon Troutsky, AF89 and Big_Dog like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I think it's comical that when the Whitehouse staff try and cover Trump's lies the trumpets on here think things are rosey and peachy. I think the FBI needs to get busy with giving the Trump/Russia investigation a final answer one way or another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, big_dog said:

And I think it's comical that when the Whitehouse staff try and cover Trump's lies the trumpets on here think things are rosey and peachy. I think the FBI needs to get busy with giving the Trump/Russia investigation a final answer one way or another.

I'll give you an answer right now, it's all BS and even though you want it so bad, Pence is not going to be POTUS for at least 8 years, if Ivanka doesn't get it first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

I'll give you an answer right now, it's all BS and even though you want it so bad, Pence is not going to be POTUS for at least 8 years, if Ivanka doesn't get it first.

OMG are you going to be in for a surprise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, WhenFalconsWin said:

I'll give you an answer right now, it's all BS and even though you want it so bad, Pence is not going to be POTUS for at least 8 years, if Ivanka doesn't get it first.

The only saving grace for Drumpf is that Democrats think Pence is just as bad, if not worse...

They'll just let agent orange continue his idiocracy until 2018...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was never about finding evidence of collusion.  It was always about trying to discredit and delegitimize the President of the United States.

That's what peeves me about it -- it's the worst kind of dirty politics.  And it's not like there aren't plenty of principled reasons to oppose him, but everyone has to try to go for the kill shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Billy Ocean said:

 

 

BO, I'm telling Trout on you...:lol:  Way to screw up a perfectly good collusion illusion...just sayin'

Can we end this farce finally and get on with governing?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, JDaveG said:

It was never about finding evidence of collusion.  It was always about trying to discredit and delegitimize the President of the United States.

That's what peeves me about it -- it's the worst kind of dirty politics.  And it's not like there aren't plenty of principled reasons to oppose him, but everyone has to try to go for the kill shot.

There are certainly more important scandals surrounding Trump, like him fabricating allegations that Obama wire tapped him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, mdrake34 said:

There are certainly more important scandals surrounding Trump, like him fabricating allegations that Obama wire tapped him. 

No doubt.  Or his adoption of Ryan's healthcare plan.  Or his continued desire to insult not only the former President, but Mrs. Clinton and others for no good reason.  Or the fact that he is an awful human being who at least is comfortable joking about sexual assault.  Or the fact that he is twice divorced and brags about sleeping with married women. Or his rhetoric regarding minorities and immigrants.

****, I'm actually still peeved that he's a billionaire and the President of these Effing United States, and yet he still wears his hair like that.

capologist, mdrake34 and Jpowors like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, JDaveG said:

It was never about finding evidence of collusion.  It was always about trying to discredit and delegitimize the President of the United States.

I think that's a gross generalization, and a bit of an ad hominem.

BrockSamson likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, JDaveG said:

No doubt.  Or his adoption of Ryan's healthcare plan.  Or his continued desire to insult not only the former President, but Mrs. Clinton and others for no good reason.  Or the fact that he is an awful human being who at least is comfortable joking about sexual assault.  Or the fact that he is twice divorced and brags about sleeping with married women. Or his rhetoric regarding minorities and immigrants.

****, I'm actually still peeved that he's a billionaire and the President of these Effing United States, and yet he still wears his hair like that.

Nothing good would have come of him actually colluding with Russia.  It could have set a global disaster. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/6/2017 at 11:40 PM, Spectre said:

 

 

On 3/12/2017 at 1:38 PM, Spectre said:

 

On 3/13/2017 at 8:50 PM, Spectre said:

 

A little background on Louise Mensch:

On 3/7/2017 at 4:02 PM, Billy Ocean said:

:lol:

 

 

Here's a conspiracy theory Louise Mensch has about American Jews spying on the US to serve Russia, complete with red identifying arrows:

 

This conspiracy theory somehow escalates even further, involving Mossad, the national intelligence agency of Israel:

 

Here's a sampling of other crazy things about Louise Mensch:

Louise Mensch accidentally calls the father of modern Zionism an anti-Semite - New Statesman (link)

~~~~~~~

Louise Mensch thinks the real face of British Islam is a man of Sikh heritage - The Independent (link)

~~~~~~~

Louise Mensch Mocked For Failing To Understand Twitter - Huffington Post (link)

~~~~~~~

Class A drugs caused me long-term mental damage: Tory MP Louise Mensch's candid confession - Daily Mail (link)

~~~~~~~

Louise Mensch’s Latest Twitter Gaffe Is Her Best Yet - Huffington Post (link)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cmon BO you know we're Russia media phobic on here, gonna need a little more than a badly translated 3 block story who's only source is a Right Wing blog outlet. :D

That being said I don't think anyone would be surprised with someone connected to Podesta being a cancer with shady connections.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, atl falcon 89 said:

Cmon BO you know we're Russia media phobic on here, gonna need a little more than a badly translated 3 block story who's only source is a Right Wing blog outlet. :D

That being said I don't think anyone would be surprised with someone connected to Podesta being a cancer with shady connections.

Katrina vandenHeuvel cosigned it.

Katrina vandenHeuvel Verified account

@KatrinaNation

The Nation magazine Editor and Publisher

~~~~~~~

The Nation is the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the United States, and the most widely read weekly journal of liberal/progressive political and cultural news, opinion, and analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Billy Ocean said:

Katrina vandenHeuvel cosigned it.

Katrina vandenHeuvel Verified account

@KatrinaNation

The Nation magazine Editor and Publisher

~~~~~~~

The Nation is the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the United States, and the most widely read weekly journal of liberal/progressive political and cultural news, opinion, and analysis.

Look to me like she just passed it along

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which isn't to say they're aren't trustworthy Russian outlets anymore but the number not directly controlled by the Kremlin gets fewer and fewer each year and the amount of resources the FSB and KGB have poured across various newsites and social media is said to be on a ridiculously huge scale and this story could even be true but they also have a clear vested interest in confirming the stories of right leaning independent sources.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Sberbank is an openly Kremlin controlled bank, and they likely don't play loose with their ****. So you have to ask yourself what exactly is their motivation for revealing the confidence of their lobbyist controlled sources here or whether they're telling the whole truth. (Could be true, could be false, could be a little of both , it's almost certainly designed to tell a particular narrative)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But again I preface all that with saying I wouldn't be shocked if Clinton's small council is hypocritical as **** when it comes to Russia. The idea that her minions were in the pockets of all kinds of foreign interests isn't a novel concept about them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now