falconstwopercentsized Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 and she said I don't know 38 times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconstwopercentsized Posted September 2, 2016 Author Share Posted September 2, 2016 according to the FBI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hoopah! Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 I wonder how many **** picks Weiner accidentally sexted to her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nono Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 at this point she could pee on the constitution and still be elected. Good luck dems you win. I can't worry about this anymore when the media and half of America is so blind to justice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 42 minutes ago, Nono said: at this point she could pee on the constitution and still be elected. Good luck dems you win. I can't worry about this anymore when the media and half of America is so blind to justice. Is peeing on the constitution illegal? you do realize this is in the same report that states that she has been cleared of wrong doing and that she will not be charged. Also if you want to win, then do not nominate a bigot next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leon Troutsky Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 The former secretary of state said she did understand when an email was marked "confidential" at the top, and "asked the interviewing agents if that was what 'c' referenced," according to the notes. The confidential label had been placed there by the FBI after the fact. Wait, WTF??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 1 hour ago, WhenFalconsWin said: We haven't had the debates yet. Hillary could lay an egg or need to sit down. It ain't over until the fat lady sings. Hopefully Obama is healthy. He is sitting during the debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kicker Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 14 hours ago, GEORGIAfan said: Hopefully Obama is healthy. He is sitting during the debate. I only wish Obama and Romney were the D & R candidates this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toadfishtom Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 16 hours ago, mdrake34 said: I wonder how many **** picks Weiner accidentally sexted to her. You should be thinking about Clemson and how to beat them . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 52 minutes ago, kicker said: I only wish Obama and Romney were the D & R candidates this time. I would vote for Obama in 2016, but HRC is a nice substitute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgBone Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 5 minutes ago, GEORGIAfan said: I would vote for Obama in 2016, but HRC is a nice substitute. I think Obama has made a pretty lousy president, and I'd vote for him in a second over these turds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kicker Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 36 minutes ago, GEORGIAfan said: I would vote for Obama in 2016, but HRC is a nice substitute. Hillary Clinton is a terrible person and anyone actively excited about voting for her seriously needs to check their soul. I'd say the say thing about Trump and his supporters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 2 hours ago, kicker said: Hillary Clinton is a terrible person and anyone actively excited about voting for her seriously needs to check their soul. I'd say the say thing about Trump and his supporters. I disagree, but you are welcome to your own opinion. Just do not expect me to respect it over my own, especially when I have done way more research on my candidate than you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 10 minutes ago, WhenFalconsWin said: You can do all the research you want GF, but the general consensus will still be that, Hillary is a terrible person. That is fine and dandy, but being a popular opinion does not make it a true one. Facts do not care about how popular they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob1272 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 22 hours ago, kicker said: I only wish Obama and Romney were the D & R candidates this time. My knee jerk when I read this was a WTF, but yea, I sorta agree. My overall opinion of Romney is in the toilet now, but I still think he would make a half decent president. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob1272 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 17 hours ago, GEORGIAfan said: I disagree, but you are welcome to your own opinion. Just do not expect me to respect it over my own, especially when I have done way more research on my candidate than you have. I know right. Vox and Twitter are the new iSeek and Infomine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UGABOZ Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 clinton is the devil in disguise and sad thing is half this board are libs and will vote for her Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob1272 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 3 minutes ago, UGABOZ said: clinton is the devil in disguise and sad thing is half this board are libs and will vote for her I get that some will vote for her simply because they find Trump intolerable, but to try and put forth that she is a good candidate that is worthy of the office by a select few is what kills me. Vote for her if you must, but stop trying to paint this crooked, lying, criminal as anything other than that. They just make themselves look more foolish in the attempt. Or maybe they're right in their defense of her, that she is not in fact a crook , she is just a complete ******* idiot that was too stupid to know that future drone strikes should be classified. and I think that way more than half this board consists of libs https://news.vice.com/article/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-classified-drone-strike-plans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 4 hours ago, silentbob1272 said: I get that some will vote for her simply because they find Trump intolerable, but to try and put forth that she is a good candidate that is worthy of the office by a select few is what kills me. Vote for her if you must, but stop trying to paint this crooked, lying, criminal as anything other than that. They just make themselves look more foolish in the attempt. Or maybe they're right in their defense of her, that she is not in fact a crook , she is just a complete ******* idiot that was too stupid to know that future drone strikes should be classified. and I think that way more than half this board consists of libs https://news.vice.com/article/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-classified-drone-strike-plans She didn't send or create the classified emails. She just trusted the people she worked with. Quote Page 22: The FBI interviewed multiple officials who authored and/or contributed to e-mails, the content of which has since been determined to contain classified information. USG employees responsible for initiating classified e-mail chains include State Civil Service employees, Foreign Service employees, Senior Executive Service employees, Presidential employees, and non-State elected officials. I can't quite tell if the report suggests that every classified email they recovered was initiated by someone else, but it seems like it. Basically, other people sent stuff to Hillary, and she trusted that these folks knew what they were doing. She didn't initiate any email exchanges herself that included classified information. Zero evidence of her being a lying crook or criminal. But Trump has been proven to be the biggest lier of this cycle and is crook for engaging in bribery to stop Trump U cases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 5 hours ago, silentbob1272 said: I know right. Vox and Twitter are the new iSeek and Infomine. I didn't need Vox or Twitter to ***** slap you in our last discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostone Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 6 hours ago, silentbob1272 said: I get that some will vote for her simply because they find Trump intolerable, but to try and put forth that she is a good candidate that is worthy of the office by a select few is what kills me. Vote for her if you must, but stop trying to paint this crooked, lying, criminal as anything other than that. They just make themselves look more foolish in the attempt. Or maybe they're right in their defense of her, that she is not in fact a crook , she is just a complete ******* idiot that was too stupid to know that future drone strikes should be classified. and I think that way more than half this board consists of libs https://news.vice.com/article/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-classified-drone-strike-plans Couldn't I reverse the names and this still work? we have a horrible dichotomy of choice... I will not vote for either terrible choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob1272 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 2 hours ago, GEORGIAfan said: I didn't need Vox or Twitter to ***** slap you in our last discussion. Your threshold for a ***** slap is pretty light there junior, but true enough, I posted a photo of a Hillary rally's crowd size that was misleading, you called it, I looked it up as I should have done before posting and saw that you were right, so I acknowledged it. I could deny the facts about it, but that would make me as delusional as you are. So naw, you got me. Also, let me save your next post. What facts have I denied? That the object of your affection is a lying, corrupt hag, unworthy of the office she is running for. http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/02/fbi-interview-catches-hillary-clinton-in-multiple-lies-private-server/ I get that you see her in one light The reality of her is quite a bit different. Enjoy the spank material. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEORGIAfan Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 8 minutes ago, silentbob1272 said: Your threshold for a ***** slap is pretty light there junior, but true enough, I posted a photo of a Hillary rally's crowd size that was misleading, you called it, I looked it up as I should have done before posting and saw that you were right, so I acknowledged it. I could deny the facts about it, but that would make me as delusional as you are. So naw, you got me. Also, let me save your next post. What facts have I denied? That the object of your affection is a lying, corrupt hag, unworthy of the office she is running for. http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/02/fbi-interview-catches-hillary-clinton-in-multiple-lies-private-server/ I get that you see in in one light The reality of her is quite a bit different. Enjoy the spank material. I wouldn't call telling you that the photo you posted has been debunked our last discussion, but I guess I do have a pattern of putting you in your place. The discussion I am thinking of was after worzilla warned you about starting discussions with me, because I live in fact part of the internet( paraphrasing obviously). What was the point to your article? FBI already stated she did not Delete emails or instruct anyone to delete emails. C marking does not make something classified. To be properly marked it needs Markings in the Header and Footer, which she correctly Identified. Those emails were improperly marked and 2 of the 3 should not have been classified anyways. So now we have 1 emails out of 30k, which was not SENT by her. The memo was sent on her behalf. That implies that she did not send it. LOL @ pandering for black votes. Who was the one who made sure all the press knew about his visit to a black church? Who is the person telling white voters we need voter ID laws, then stating that we need a new civil rights agenda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOR Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Who is this worzilla character? Harambe didn't die so you could confuse me with a giant lizard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob1272 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 10 minutes ago, GEORGIAfan said: I wouldn't call telling you that the photo you posted has been debunked our last discussion, but I guess I do have a pattern of putting you in your place. The discussion I am thinking of was after worzilla warned you about starting discussions with me, because I live in fact part of the internet( paraphrasing obviously). What was the point to your article? FBI already stated she did not Delete emails or instruct anyone to delete emails. C marking does not make something classified. To be properly marked it needs Markings in the Header and Footer, which she correctly Identified. Those emails were improperly marked and 2 of the 3 should not have been classified anyways. So now we have 1 emails out of 30k, which was not SENT by her. The memo was sent on her behalf. That implies that she did not send it. LOL @ pandering for black votes. Who was the one who made sure all the press knew about his visit to a black church? Who is the person telling white voters we need voter ID laws, then stating that we need a new civil rights agenda. I must have missed that. I saw Worilla one time express his fear of you, I remember telling him not to be a p****, or something to the effect. If you "***** slapped" me in a reply to that...I failed to notice. The article content has been argued. I put it in to be sure my lying hag statement had more basis than just opinion. The meme was used more for the image than the text, and I agree that the black church visit was pandering. I said the other night when you and others were bitching that his message of conciliation and listening to the black community was meaningless because he said it in front of a bunch of whitey's that the message was the same, people of all races were invited to hear that and every speech and he did not need to go kiss any rings to convey the same message again. He felt differently and went pandering just as much as Hillary does when she does this type song and dance once or twice every four years. So how you like that ***** slap *****? See, it's easy to claim to have done it, it doesn't make it so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.