BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 I agree with its weird to say we overpaid before Sanu plays. I completely disagree with some opinions on what we need from Sanu to make him worth it. The point this year is balance. Matt completed 407 passes last year. Way too many imo but let's roll with it. Thats 25 per game. Give Julio 10. Give Devonta/Cole 3. Give Tam/Hoop 4. Give Hardy 3. Am I being conservative enough? That leaves Sanu catching 5. That's what we need from him all things being equal. He'll backup returns. He'll block. He'll give us flea flickers. He'll spread the field. I really like Tamme but there is no denying how talented and natural Hooper looks. Devonta is a top 3 backfield receiver. We merge Sanu this year. We target a high pick/rookie contract at WR next year. Sanu was a very smart pickup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy monday Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 (edited) Do you guys think shanahan will have any passing plays for sanu? I personally don't see it myself. Edited May 20, 2016 by Willy monday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeDemBirds60 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 20 minutes ago, BCurt57 said: I agree with its weird to say we overpaid before Sanu plays. I completely disagree with some opinions on what we need from Sanu to make him worth it. The point this year is balance. Matt completed 407 passes last year. Way too many imo but let's roll with it. Thats 25 per game. Give Julio 10. Give Devonta/Cole 3. Give Tam/Hoop 4. Give Hardy 3. Am I being conservative enough? That leaves Sanu catching 5. That's what we need from him all things being equal. He'll backup returns. He'll block. He'll give us flea flickers. He'll spread the field. I really like Tamme but there is no denying how talented and natural Hooper looks. Devonta is a top 3 backfield receiver. We merge Sanu this year. We target a high pick/rookie contract at WR next year. Sanu was a very smart pickup. My thoughts exactly were probably gonna draft a sub 4.4 in the 3rd/4th next year and draft or sign a RG and our offense will be complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 Sure. I think Shanahan is on the hot seat though. And I think our line can easily be converted to s more conventional scheme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFalconRises Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Got a friend who's a diehard Bengals fan. He was pissed they let him go. Hope he's right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 I do too. Guy drops balls-really works to fix it. QB-really works to be a receiver. Steps up when guys go down. Blocks his azz off. Matt needs speed out there. Loved Roddy but it was time. I think Shanahan who seems odd at times, and difficult, has been pretty classy about not responding or pointing out Roddy's weaknesses which may have included not really learning the playbook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madness21 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Why pay that much for a #2 receiver if that's all you're gonna get out of him. We can get that from Hester......I don't get it. I'd rather have Roddy White or someone. That's not enough contribution for a #2 imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwh33 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 53 minutes ago, BCurt57 said: Matt completed 407 passes last year. Way too many imo but let's roll with it. You can never complete too many passes, but you can definitely attempt too many ☺ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFanSince1969 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 1 minute ago, Madness21 said: Why pay that much for a #2 receiver if that's all you're gonna get out of him. We can get that from Hester......I don't get it. I'd rather have Roddy White or someone. That's not enough contribution for a #2 imo. A lot of what sanu does isn't going to show up on a stat sheet. He's an extremely physical blocker as well as a threat for a few big trick plays a year. He had two passing TDs last year I believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxatlanta Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 We needed a physical receiver on crossing routes and a red zone target. So in that sense we got what we needed. As far as what we paid, yes it was clearly too much based on his career up to this point. I also would be suprised if he all of a sudden becomes an 80 reception receiver. The best season of his career he had 56 rec, 790 yds, and 5 tds. Last season he had 33 rec, 390 yds, 0 tds. Answer this- if Sanu matches the best season of his career and puts up 3.5 catches per game, 50 yards per game, and 5 tds- is he worth $7million per year? It dont add up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoYouSeeWhatHappensLarry Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 7 minutes ago, Madness21 said: Why pay that much for a #2 receiver if that's all you're gonna get out of him. We can get that from Hester......I don't get it. I'd rather have Roddy White or someone. That's not enough contribution for a #2 imo. We can't get anything from Hester. we can't get anything from Roddy White either. 5 receptions a game is 80 catches. At 12 yards per catch, that's 960 yards. That's a good #2 season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B_Lo_Touchdowns Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Sanu will need like 12-15 attempts to have 5 completions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 He did. And they ran him out of the backfield a bit. I've never seen a receiver in the NFL with Hans as bad as Hankerson but his speed made him an easy target for Matt. *edit-guy who said you can never have too many completions is dead right. I'd like more running if only because it usually means we aren't always behind and zone run blocking exhausts certain D lines Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 And really you can't get much from Hester as a receiver. Now you put him on the field with Sanu running an option or a reverse and that's gonna be a lot of fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoYouSeeWhatHappensLarry Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 8 minutes ago, B_Lo_Touchdowns said: Sanu will need like 12-15 attempts to have 5 completions No. He'll need like 8. Not for nothing but his target conversion percentage is only ~2.8% behind Julio Jones' Let's calm down with the ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxatlanta Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 The point of what he cost is that the money would have been better spent elsewhere. OG was a big need. We gave Chester 2.8mil. Mike Iupati got 8mil/yr. We could've signed him for 5.2 more instead. IMO it would make a bigger impact on our offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoYouSeeWhatHappensLarry Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 1 minute ago, maxatlanta said: The point of what he cost is that the money would have been better spent elsewhere. OG was a big need. We gave Chester 2.8mil. Mike Iupati got 8mil/yr. We could've signed him for 5.2 more instead. IMO it would make a bigger impact on our offense. 1) Mike Iupati signed a deal last year.....he wasnt a free agent this year. 2) OG was not a bigger need than WR2. 3) Alex Mack goes a long way toward limiting the need at Guard. Barring acquiring a DOMINANT guard, you're not likely to see a big impact. There was one dominant guard in this FA class and he got like $12m a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconidae Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 4 hours ago, B_Lo_Touchdowns said: Sanu will need like 12-15 attempts to have 5 completions How many drops did Sanu have in 2014, I meant 2015? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diesel_Bird Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, maxatlanta said: We needed a physical receiver on crossing routes and a red zone target. So in that sense we got what we needed. As far as what we paid, yes it was clearly too much based on his career up to this point. I also would be suprised if he all of a sudden becomes an 80 reception receiver. The best season of his career he had 56 rec, 790 yds, and 5 tds. Last season he had 33 rec, 390 yds, 0 tds. Answer this- if Sanu matches the best season of his career and puts up 3.5 catches per game, 50 yards per game, and 5 tds- is he worth $7million per year? It dont add up. Yeah I've always heard, you pay in free agency for what someone is going to do, not what they've done in the past. And he hasn't done a lot and I like the sign, just not what they paid. But like others have said. There weren't a whole lot of options Edited May 20, 2016 by Diesel_Bird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falconcheff Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 43 minutes ago, maxatlanta said: We needed a physical receiver on crossing routes and a red zone target. So in that sense we got what we needed. As far as what we paid, yes it was clearly too much based on his career up to this point. I also would be suprised if he all of a sudden becomes an 80 reception receiver. The best season of his career he had 56 rec, 790 yds, and 5 tds. Last season he had 33 rec, 390 yds, 0 tds. Answer this- if Sanu matches the best season of his career and puts up 3.5 catches per game, 50 yards per game, and 5 tds- is he worth $7million per year? It dont add up. Intangibles...I think if Sanu's presence increases Julio's production, it will be worth it... let's face it, nobody was too worried about Roddy last year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 13 minutes ago, falconidae said: How many drops did Sanu have in 2014? He ranked 401st in drops last year. 49 targets, 33 catches and 0 drops. Massive improvement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 Misread. In 2014 he was in top 25 for drops, in 2015-0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCurt57 Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 Roddy had 25th most drops last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.11 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Willy monday said: Do you guys think shanahan will have any passing plays for sanu? I personally don't see it myself. This is just being ignorant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoYouSeeWhatHappensLarry Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Why do people think that "balance" is inherently better? I think "balance" may be correlated to winning but I don't think it's particularly causative to winning. When you're winning, you typically run the ball more. Which gives the impression of balance. But a ton of teams thrive with offenses based on the passing attack...because passing the ball is inherently more efficient than running the ball. I think we should do whats working. If the run game is working and the pass game is working, we'll be in a good place. But this notion of "well, we need to run the ball 30 times to win" is misplaced, IMO. Winning may allow us to rush the ball 30 times. Doesnt necessarily work that way the other way around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.