Jump to content

Falcons Sack Predictions 2016- Time to quit whining and go on record


gazoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

In 2015 the Falcons recorded a pathetic 19 sacks. The flip side of this stat is we also recorded 119 QB hurries which was near the top of the NFL in hurries. Many are complaining we did nothing to help our pass rush. Yet, we were at bottom of NFL in quick passes given up to RBs and TEs. We addressed this by bringing in players who can cover TEs and RBs. Many of the new LBs we have can rush the passer. We also signed some new veterans who can get to the QB and get back a healthy Brooks Reed who had 3 sacks and 10 QB hits in 2014 prior to the nasty groin injury he had that hampered him last year.

I suggest we did a lot this offseason to help increase sack totals, to convert many of those hurries into sacks and actually improve the  pass rush as a whole. In Quinns scheme, he relies on the pass rush coming from many places including his linebackers, he doesn't relay on one guy getting double digit sacks.

Here are the sack totals of the #1 rated scoring defenses over the last 3 seasons:

2012: Chiefs had 27 sacks

2013: Jags had 31 sacks

2015: 49ers had 28 sacks

 

My prediction for the Falcons is we will increase from 19 sacks last year to 28 sacks in 2016. That means I'm predicting we get same amount of sacks 2 out of the last 3 top rated defenses got.  If we can get at or near 28 sacks we have a chance to be an awesome defense this season. 

If you disagree and are screaming from the rooftops my assessment is incorrect becuase we did not fix our pass rush, THEN GO ON RECORD AND TELL US ALL HOW MANY SACKS YOU PREDICT THE 2016 FALCON DEFENSE WILL GET.  

 

GO ON RECORD OR STOP BIOTCHING!!!!!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just now, falcndave said:

I've already predicted 10 for Beasley. That's the extent of my predictions. I believe improved coverage verses RB/TE will turn his pressures into sacks.

I agree with everything you said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

first off - GAZOO - why don't you put up some legit stats......

San Francisco was the #1 scoring defense last year?  yeah, right....try #18.....even the Falcons were better!

Gazoo should take his thread down - he does not even have his basic facts right.

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?seasonType=REG&offensiveStatisticCategory=null&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=TOTAL_POINTS_GAME_AVG&tabSeq=2&season=2015&role=OPP&Submit=Go&archive=false&conference=null&defensiveStatisticCategory=SCORING&qualified=false

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate everyone who made their predictions based on the information we have at this point in time.

Please notice those on the message board bemoaning our pass rush isn't fixed, in other words predicting 19 or less sacks this year, refuse to go on record, they just keep banging their spoons on their high chairs without quantifying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do believe the sack total will significantly improve this season. Beasley has a year of experience under his belt, and might be getting more snaps playing some LB, in addition to pass-rushing DE. Jarret and Hageman with extra year of experience. Addition of Shelby as a base DE and DT in nickle should help. Playing Clayborn almost exclusively at DE should help. Better pass coverage of TEs and RBs by our new LBs and SS should provide a good boost. Upshaw might help, if he gets snaps at base DE, rather than TJax, in addition to SLB. Reed should be more healthy. Spoon was a decent blitzer, and Campbell/Jones might have blitz potential. With all that said, my sack prognostication as follows:

Beasley = 8

Shelby = 5

Clayborn = 4

Babs = 3

Jarrett = 2

Hageman = 2

Upshaw = 2

Blitzing LBs = 2

Blitzing DBs = 2

Total = 30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...