GeorgiaBoyz Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 (edited) You weak ****** find anything to cry about. Our passrush may not be on the Bills level but it shows up more often then not. 4-0, Negative Nancy make that your username. Edited October 4, 2015 by GeorgiaBoyz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Minotaur Zebra Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Yall want us to make the SB but get scared to talk about the very issues that will keep us from reaching that point...Yea our run D looks good and we have good corners, but even backups will dice you if they have a week in the pocket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon@Denmark Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Just responding to your crying with more.You're the one doing all the crying ... Again. But you admitted, that you are making these posts to get attention. OK, my friend - Count your pages and enjoy your fame ... I'm going to celebrate another great win. 4 and ******* 0! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Minotaur Zebra Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Nah, it's presentation, and it's b/c it's him.It's the same reason why parolees get targeted by the police. If the shoe fits.Hey I'm always on Torris' **** but he makes a point sometimes, this is one of those times IMO. Beasley having half the sacks on the team is not the way it should be. Especially when that total number of sacks is 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedead Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Ok Mike Smith.Not at all .. I want sacks but it worked for this game. I mean what would sacks have done for this game still held to 0 pts. We need a little more push up the middle and we will get them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lornoth Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Hey I'm always on Torris' **** but he makes a point sometimes, this is one of those times IMO. Beasley having half the sacks on the team is not the way it should be. Especially when that total number of sacks is 4. That's the scheme mate. Seattle never had huge amounts of sacks, it's just not how we go about things. So if you're expecting a bunch of sacks you'll be disappointed until Quinn is no longer here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjerry Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Hey I'm always on Torris' **** but he makes a point sometimes, this is one of those times IMO. Beasley having half the sacks on the team is not the way it should be. Especially when that total number of sacks is 4. He should have waited till, at minimum, after the game. This was, at very least, ill timed. At worst, and I think that this is what everyone assumes at this point when he does this, it was done at that time on purpose, to spark negative reactions. Most took it as him trying, again, to deflate everyone's balloons, and I really have no reason to believe otherwise at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Negatorris Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 He should have waited till, at minimum, after the game. This was, at very least, ill timed. At worst, and I think that this is what everyone assumes at this point when he does this, it was done at that time on purpose, to spark negative reactions. Most took it as him trying, again, to deflate everyone's balloons, and I really have no reason to believe otherwise at this point.The game was over at halftime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Minotaur Zebra Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 That's the scheme mate. Seattle never had huge amounts of sacks, it's just not how we go about things. So if you're expecting a bunch of sacks you'll be disappointed until Quinn is no longer here.Oh no doubt. And we have weaker pass rushers than Seattle so we are def gonna get less. But that is Torris' point. We need to really try to hit at least near Seattle's sack rate. ****, anyone know how many sacks Seattle had by week 4 last yr?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest King Jigsaw Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 I don't give a **** what annoys you, dikhead. I'm allowed to state my opinions. You do know there's a ******* ignore option?Time to get banned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lornoth Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Oh no doubt. And we have weaker pass rushers than Seattle so we are def gonna get less. But that is Torris' point. We need to really try to hit at least near Seattle's sack rate. ****, anyone know how many sacks Seattle had by week 4 last yr??That's what I mean though, we shouldn't even be worrying about the sack numbers. We're getting good pressure when we need to, that's all the scheme needs to be successful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stizz Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Blame yourselves. If I made a thread about how well the OL blacks, or how good Freeman is, it would be lucky to get 3 replies.Yall quickly make threads like these get to 3+ pages. If it annoys you guys, why are you entertaining it?I wanted to ha e a discussion about the sad pass rush, and most of you wanted to argue. *shrug*You give my "negative" threads attention so you must actually like them...Edit: And when have I made a thread about disliking this team? Just because I don't think they are SB contenders nor as good as our record indicates, doesn't mean I dislike the team. We have holes and I am allowed to comment about them whether we blow someone out or not. The Texans are a terrible team. When we lose a game the thread will be gloom and doom like it was after that Dolphins PS game. I've been a Falcons fan for years, and have been a MB member for years. I don't need to be happy go lucky like everyone else.We're 4-0, one of the top 3 teams in the NFC, yet we aren't as good as our record indicates? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Negatorris Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 We're 4-0, one of the top 3 teams in the NFC, yet we aren't as good as our record indicates?We aren't exactly facing juggernaunts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duff_Man Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 This is really stupid. I just read this out loud at Taco Mac and it got laughed at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMERICAN NIGHTMARE Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 We aren't exactly facing juggernaunts.WAH WAH WAH. you play the cards you are dealt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Power O Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Hageman sack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Negatorris Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 This is really stupid. I just read this out loud at Taco Mac and it got laughed at.Sounds like all clueless homers hang at Taco Mac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRUNKuno Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Everybody pointing out the score and record as facts, but our lack of pass rush is a fact as well. Had Mallet been any form of accurate, we'd probably be telling a totally different story right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuggle'2 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 I mean, I would have waited at least until tomorrow before I started dissecting basically a 41-0 game, but nothing at all wrong with this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoneOne01 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 (edited) Pointing out a team's flaws after a win is normal. Fans do this in every sport. Even after a beatdown. The coaches sure as **** don't have the mentality of " a wins a win".Remember, there is always room for improvement. Edited October 4, 2015 by ZoneOne01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UGABOZ Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Up 28-0 and yet you nit pick as always. Yes the Dline isn't doing that well, it's going to take a few years to have a good dline.disagree this is a big problem but great win today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFanSince1969 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 I'm going to assume your tears cure cancer. If I'm wrong you probably need to find a different hobby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pzummo Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Everybody pointing out the score and record as facts, but our lack of pass rush is a fact as well. Had Mallet been any form of accurate, we'd probably be telling a totally different story right now.Another fact is Mallett completed over 60% of his passes last week. Another fact is we played man in order to disrupt the timing, which contributed to his inaccuracy. Another fact is Tru had perfect coverage on his accurate passes, which deflected into an interception. Another fact is that Alford had excellent coverage with several deflections. Another fact is we forced fumbles, which you can't put on Mallett's accuracy. Another fact is we completely shutdown their running game, which you can't put on Mallett's accuracy. Another fact is they were 1 of 8 on 3rd down before our backups came in. Another fact is we moved the ball at will converting over half our first downs against a defense that was 2nd in the NFL at getting off the field on third down.And last but not least, Mallett got hit several times early. The passrush was there, it just wasn't getting him down before the throw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Dog Named Brian Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 I'll give OP credit, definitely lives up to the screen name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFanSince1969 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Who gives a flying **** about pressuring Ryan Mallett? He's going to make mistakes regardless of pressure. Who do you fear more? Mallet or Foster?Some of you...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.