Kayoh Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 DISCLAIMER: If all you're going to do is post about how much you blindly hate PFF because of their grades not agreeing with what you think you see, kindly just move on to another thread, please. I'm posting this for the people that actually want to see it and I know there are at least a few of them in here. Thanks. That being said, here are the grades from the Philly game: Offense: Defense: Special Teams: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wjcorner Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Gave Freeman a .2 in rushing and Coleman a -.6? Wonder what they saw? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayoh Posted September 15, 2015 Author Share Posted September 15, 2015 Personal observations: Legitimately surprised by how low Durant, Schofield and Clayborn's grades ended up being. I guess it just comes down to them making splash plays but not consistently playing well, and I just wasn't watching them individually on their worse snaps & didn't notice. Great to see Chester stepping in and playing well immediately. Levitre & Person are a bit of a concern, but at least they're pass blocking well. 11 total pressures is nice to see. Would be nicer to see if Philly didn't throw almost 50 times. Sub-25% pressure rate is meh. That said though, Beasley is the only guy on our defense with a positive pass rush grade. Pretty cool to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayoh Posted September 15, 2015 Author Share Posted September 15, 2015 Gave Freeman a .2 in rushing and Coleman a -.6? Wonder what they saw? I'm guessing it has a lot to do with Coleman running into bodies and going down too easily while Freeman made better decisions and broke more tackles. Looking forward to the write-up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wjcorner Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 I'm guessing it has a lot to do with Coleman running into bodies and going down too easily while Freeman made better decisions and broke more tackles. Looking forward to the write-up.i'll watch the all-22 tomorrow or Wednesday but I'm almost positive that's pretty backwards analysis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtybird56 Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 I'm guessing it has a lot to do with Coleman running into bodies and going down too easily while Freeman made better decisions and broke more tackles. Looking forward to the write-up.Coleman looked way better tonight, made a lot of positive runs out of poor blocking up front. I do think Freeman is a better back than he showed tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keys Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Bryant made 4/4 FG and only 1.1? Come on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambysquared Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 mr nuclear leg himself topping out even king Julio for top grades Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hingle McCringleberry Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 I'm guessing it has a lot to do with Coleman running into bodies and going down too easily while Freeman made better decisions and broke more tackles. Looking forward to the write-up.I think you got that backwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmo_dlo Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Thanks for posting. One more peculiarity is how Hankerson gets a -1.9 for penalty but Roddy grades positive? Also for a defense that kept the best backfield in NFL in check for most of the night, overall run defense numbers are way too low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toadfishtom Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Thank you for posting , interesting to see these grades always.Bosher has the highest grade I have ever seen.Freeman higher than Coleman ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzard_falcon Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Lol @ Bosher's grade... holy crap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimifalcon Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Bosher is a boss!wow,what a grade! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HEIST Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 beasley got killed for that offsides penalty that ended up getting declined :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FulC0 Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 These ratings are a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etherdome Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 First of all, thank you for posting. I pretty much agree with most of the grades. I think that Schofield played better than rated, but I won't argue the point. Bierman, with the exception of his stellar ST near-block of the field goal, was garbage. Moore had a good game, but his habit of leading with his helmet is rookie-grade. He misses tackles too often for a SS, and his technique is going to attract penalties. Levitre deserves a break. He looks like the weak link on the line, but I suspect that he will improve with some playing and practice time. Chester did a good job but the two guys next to him (Schraeder and Person) need to get their run blocking squared away. I am shocked to agree with Durant's scores. Durant looked confused and inexperienced. What happened? Matt Ryan did not look good. He made some very good calls at the line, but he gacked a few passes. I think that he will clean his act up, but his score for last night is justified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskooler Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Gave Freeman a .2 in rushing and Coleman a -.6? Wonder what they saw?They're people in India who don't have a clue what they're watching. They just click a counter at what they think they see. PFF, whether it agrees with me or not, is useless garbage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tootie Quivers Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Surprised by the Durant grade not at all surprised with the William Moore grade. He didn't look good at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vel Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Not surprised by Durant's nor WillyMo's grades. Moore was bad. He made a great INT, but his tackling was poor, he took poor angles and didn't set the edge consistently. Durant didn't set the edge consistently on his side neither. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaptain Krazy Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 i'll watch the all-22 tomorrow or Wednesday but I'm almost positive that's pretty backwards analysis. i was about to post the same thing. It was Coleman who showed better vision and ran threw tackles to fall forward for positive yards, 20 carries for 80 yards vs 10 carries for 18 yards - it would take a LOT of analysis to convince me that those stats and what i saw live from the Dome are wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vel Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 And yall were panicking about the OL remember...Yall blew that Dolphins game WAY out of proportion and ignored the facts. There is no Polumbus or Stone out there now. I don't think Andy looked that bad, but whatever. Also, Schofield definitely had 3 QB hits. They showed them during half time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Minotaur Zebra Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Gave Freeman a .2 in rushing and Coleman a -.6? Wonder what they saw?I know Kayoh didn't want PFF complaining in here... but this is why I can't take PFF seriously. I DO like seeing the grades and at times it is very telling (nice seeing our OL grade out pretty OK) ... but it is clear as day that some rankings are bogus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwickha2 Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 A couple points:Is anyone else happy to see Worrilow with a positive pass coverage grade?Oline-wise I think I agree with it. On runs it did seem that the LG and C were the problem areas but going against Fletcher Cox is a challenge.Everything else I agree with. I thought Coleman looked good but I think he left some yards on the field. A lot of that has to do with being the 1st game with this Oline and him being a rookie but I liked him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskooler Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Person is still learning the C position.In a scheme predicated around communication and teamwork, Levitre played after only 4 practices.Chester was solid.Matthews was ok, but needs to improve.Schraeder's main contribution last night was providing even more impetus to sign Jake Long.With or without Long, I said all along that there would be struggles, and that it would take all or most of this season for the line to gel and become a truly effective unit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mid-Nite-Toker Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Thanks Kayoh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.