Sheldon Cooper Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Quinn said they are still tinkering with match ups inside.To me Chester is a push over in pass pro with no base. Asamoah is the superior OG in that regard. Asamoah looks rough run blocking on the move which is where Chester figures to have the upperhand due to experience.In all of this Hawley looks like the best OC while Stone looks like the LG to me no doubt. Person is good as OG depth only which presents a problem. Konz has a good shot as back up OC and could be active on game day over Person because of snapping to the QB. Ryan Seymour might be able to beat Konz out of back up job or even Person if he can play G a well as C. I would rather see Chester as good experienced depth and Asamoah catch on to the run blocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryanadonis Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Seymour playing tonight ? I must of missed how he became a falcon ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovie_Lover Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Seymour plays for the Browns /.- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndySG Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 He was waived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningThePiszOuttaTheBall Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 IMO Chester had a bad game last week. Stone had some bad plays, but also some good ones (hate to say it, but that balances out as a bad game too).Either these guys need the light bulb to suddenly click, or we need some other options. I'm thinking they need to promote Asamoah and deal with the fact he's not everything they want in the zone blocking run scheme.And I wish we'd get some help. I don't know how or who, but I don't think we're in great O line shape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capologist Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 The only OC on this team is Kyle Shanahan.C and G. No O as there is no D counterpart... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
⚡Slumerican⚡ Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Seymour is done, he was done 2 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayOzOne Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Plenty of bad going on if Konz gets beat by a guy we already cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndySG Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 The only OC on this team is Kyle Shanahan.C and G. No O as there is no D counterpart...Was going to say this - never understand why people feel the need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capologist Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Was going to say this - never understand why people feel the need.Because of OT/DT. It caused an epidemic... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndySG Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Also, if Ryan Seymour is only that standard WITH performance-enhancing drugs then I don't want to see his performances when clean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FenixFalcon Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Plenty of bad going on if Konz gets beat by a guy we already cut.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 The only OC on this team is Kyle Shanahan.C and G. No O as there is no D counterpart...and yet we have Wide Receivers with no Narrow Receiverswhy the Wwe have Tight Ends with no Loose Ends can we drop the T we have Defensive Ends but no Offensive Ends can we drop the DIF C means Center ---Does CB mean Center Back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kung-Pow Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 and yet we have Wide Receivers with no Narrow Receiverswhy the WBecause they are split "wide." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndySG Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 we have Tight Ends with no Loose Ends can we drop the T we have Defensive Ends but no Offensive Ends can we drop the DThen we have two "End" positions, silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovie_Lover Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 and yet we have Wide Receivers with no Narrow Receiverswhy the Wwe have Tight Ends with no Loose Ends can we drop the T we have Defensive Ends but no Offensive Ends can we drop the DIF C means Center ---Does CB mean Center BackThey are split out wide smh...That is so ignorant it hurt me.It's called a CORNER "C" BACK "B" put those together and see what you get Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 Because they are split "wide."not the guy in the slotoh wait there's a whole new set of problems is he a SWR or SR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 They are split out wide smh...That is so ignorant it hurt me.It's called a CORNER "C" BACK "B" put those together and see what you getput Offensive and Guard together and see what you getput Offensive and Center together and see what you getCapologist DEFINED C as CENTER you can't change it to Corner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capologist Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 put Offensive and Guard together and see what you getput Offensive and Center together and see what you getCapologist DEFINED C as CENTER you can't change it to CornerYes, I have spoken, let it be written, so it shall be done... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovie_Lover Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 put Offensive and Guard together and see what you getput Offensive and Center together and see what you getCapologist DEFINED C as CENTER you can't change it to CornerOG I don't see where that contradicts any other positionNo one calls it a offensive center it's just the center so Cand C is a center but CB is corner back. If we use your ignorant logic then the world would be in chaos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 OG I don't see where that contradicts any other positionNo one calls it a offensive center it's just the center so Cand C is a center but CB is corner back. If we use your ignorant logic then the world would be in chaos.I did not establish the logic Capologist did I was just trying to show where it lead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovie_Lover Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 I did not establish the logic Capologist did I was just trying to show where it leadHe just said C and G there is no need for a O as there is no defensive counterpart. He never said all C's mean center like you tried saying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 He just said C and G there is no need for a O as there is no defensive counterpart. He never said all C's mean center like you tried sayingand extending his "logic" if there is no need for an O in front of the C why is there a need for a W in front of receiver etccome on man don't you know how to have a little fun Capologist knows what I was doing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovie_Lover Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 and extending his "logic" if there is no need for an O in front of the C why is there a need for a W in front of receiver etccome on man don't you know how to have a little fun Capologist knows what I was doingThe W one actually made sense but the others.. nah.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted August 29, 2015 Share Posted August 29, 2015 The W one actually made sense but the others.. nah..exactly but that's where his position would lead you --"logically"Oh for the good old days when we had Split Ends and Tight Ends and Defensive Endsand we did not know what a Wide Recievr wasand Half Backs and Full backs and Up backs and Blocking Backs and no Running backs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.