djbrough Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 mack is 250+ beasley is 235+ Beasley was 246 at the combine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskooler Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Are you saying the football pundits are all a bunch of poosies?Only the ones who can't kick my butt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-dawg Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 All the hot air about a player's size reminds me of one of the most VICIOUS hitters ever to play in the NFL......Lester Hayes, CB for the Raiders in the 70's and 80's.He was 6' tall, 200 lbs. and could put anybody on IR with one hit.Anybody.One h.ell of a DB, a pure football wrecking machine.200 lbs.not one of your better points my friend. 6'0" 200lb. CB back in the 1980's was HUGE. CBs defending 200lb WRs is different than DE/LEO going up against 320lb OTs.Apples & Oranges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-dawg Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Beasley was 246 at the combine.true but he did not play at that weight. Beasley will be just fine but he was a poor run defender and the lack of bulk probably has something to do with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdz4i Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 At their combines Mack was 251 while Beasley was 246.true but he did not play at that weight. Beasley will be just fine but he was a poor run defender and the lack of bulk probably has something to do with it.^^this. he might have put on weight, but he is not used to carrying it or playing at it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.