Trouble Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Vicodingate Vitt got a few games suspended for something by all accounts is a felony by law. Payton was also involved to make it worse.BountyGate was against NFL rules. with several players and coaches getting suspended. But the hardest hit was the head coach and the DCVS.Deflate gate that is against NFL rules.People question why Bellicheat still has a job after having multi scandals. But Payton and Vitt does as well and for Payton and Vitt its during the same time frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DD: Objective Elite Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 The return of Scoop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Vicodingate Vitt got a few games suspended for something by all accounts is a felony by law. Payton was also involved to make it worse.BountyGate was against NFL rules. with several players and coaches getting suspended. But the hardest hit was the head coach and the DCVS.Deflate gate that is against NFL rules.People question why Bellicheat still has a job after having multi scandals. But Payton and Vitt does as well and for Payton and Vitt its during the same time frame.the events of bounty gate not only were not against the rules, the NFL had given written permission to run such programs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treefiddy Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 the events of bounty gate not only were not against the rules, the NFL had given written permission to run such programs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/18/in-1996-nfl-was-ok-with-reggie-white-paying-teammates-for-hits/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treefiddy Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/18/in-1996-nfl-was-ok-with-reggie-white-paying-teammates-for-hits/Awesome article...You know what else is awesome... In 1996 weed was COMPLETELY illegal. Now it's legal in a few places and steaming towards being legal everywhere...Why is this relevant you ask? Because that Article is comparing 1996 to 2009/10 as to why something should be right/wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Mo Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Awesome article...You know what else is awesome... In 1996 weed was COMPLETELY illegal. Now it's legal in a few places and steaming towards being legal everywhere...Why is this relevant you ask? Because that Article is comparing 1996 to 2009/10 as to why something should be right/wrong.this has nothing to do what is legal and everything to do with the internal P&P of a corporation which is something you obviously know nothing about. when a company puts a policy or procedure in place, either in writing or through a track record of actions, it stays in place until specifically repealed or replaced. it is very much like a college handbookthus far, I have found no evidence of that policy being repealed by the NFL at any point which meant that it was still in effectcorporations that have been around for decades still operate by their original policies and procedures unless they have been changed by the company or by some law (such as discrimination by sexual orientation) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 this has nothing to do what is legal and everything to do with the internal P&P of a corporation which is something you obviously know nothing about. when a company puts a policy or procedure in place, either in writing or through a track record of actions, it stays in place until specifically repealed or replaced. it is very much like a college handbookthus far, I have found no evidence of that policy being repealed by the NFL at any point which meant that it was still in effectcorporations that have been around for decades still operate by their original policies and procedures unless they have been changed by the company or by some law (such as discrimination by sexual orientation) which is why Florio, who is also an attorney, is making that point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintsFanInLA Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 (edited) this has nothing to do what is legal and everything to do with the internal P&P of a corporation which is something you obviously know nothing about. when a company puts a policy or procedure in place, either in writing or through a track record of actions, it stays in place until specifically repealed or replaced. it is very much like a college handbookthus far, I have found no evidence of that policy being repealed by the NFL at any point which meant that it was still in effectcorporations that have been around for decades still operate by their original policies and procedures unless they have been changed by the company or by some law (such as discrimination by sexual orientation) NO NO NO NO NO!! You are infusing this discussion with too much knowledge and too many facts. What you will get in response is the internet equivalent of someone sticking one's fingers in one's ear and yelling "BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH", followed by some insult. Somehow this seems relevant:Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you Edited May 14, 2015 by SaintsFanInLA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElbowDrop Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Dago when the story first came out they said the saints were asked to stop but failed to cooperate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 NoiseGate was worse than either....case closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meezy0236 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Time to start rehashing the same BS again! Thanks Danight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DD: Objective Elite Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 NoiseGate was worse than either....case closed.JB judge, jury and exocutioner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Dago when the story first came out they said the saints were asked to stop but failed to cooperate.the NFL also claimed to have 15,000 pages of documentation and indisputable evidence against the 4 players suspendedlater those suspensions were revoked by Paul Tagliabue, the former NFL commissioner, for lack of evidence and the 15,000 pages never materialized Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRay Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 I'll throw danight his bone.....Saints got fuqked deeper than the Patriots. So New Orleans for $800 Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElbowDrop Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 (edited) the NFL also claimed to have 15,000 pages of documentation and indisputable evidence against the 4 players suspendedlater those suspensions were revoked by Paul Tagliabue, the former NFL commissioner, for lack of evidence and the 15,000 pages never materializedlol okay man we've gone on this merry go round a million times.this debate is more boring than arguing mayo vs. miracle whip Edited May 14, 2015 by ElbowDrop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 I have no facts...just rhetoric and Roger Goodell talking pointsyes, I knowthrough the whole thing, I provided facts and legal opinions which was something sorely lacking from posters like youit takes a special kind of person to hold on to an opinion despite overwhelming proof and facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DD: Objective Elite Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 lol okay man we've gone on this merry go round a million times.this debate is more boring than arguing mayo vs. miracle whipMiricle Whip sucks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElbowDrop Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 yes, I knowthrough the whole thing, I provided facts and legal opinions which was something sorely lacking from posters like youit takes a special kind of person to hold on to an opinion despite overwhelming proof and factsI love you Dago but your team loyalty makes you look like a doofus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 I love you Dago but your team loyalty makes you look like a doofusactually it's a loyalty to objectivity and factsI invite anybody to post facts that show otherwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElbowDrop Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 actually it's a loyalty to objectivity and factsI invite anybody to post facts that show otherwiseyour facts are interpretations. you haven't shown the least bit of objectivity through the entire case. the facts were all laid out, what. ..2 years ago? you chose to ignore them then but now want to latch on to anything to that counters the evidence that originally came out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon Man™ Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 I love you Dago but your team loyalty makes you look like a doofus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon Man™ Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 your facts are interpretations. you haven't shown the least bit of objectivity through the entire case. the facts were all laid out, what. ..2 years ago? you chose to ignore them then but now want to latch on to anything to that counters the evidence that originally came outDago just might me the most objective poster on this entire board. And you are a big time homer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 your facts are interpretations. you haven't shown the least bit of objectivity through the entire case. the facts were all laid out, what. ..2 years ago? you chose to ignore them then but now want to latch on to anything to that counters the evidence that originally came outare you high? I was posting the facts as they came out along with several legal experts and a federal judge. obviously you weren't around at that timewhat I am saying isn't 'interpretations'...it is facts. everything I have stated in this thread is a fact.the couple of people in this thread who disagree with me have yet to post a single fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts