DarrellShropshire Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Pairing this guy with Julio for the future would be huge. Those 2 on the outside, and Roddy and Hester playing inside. That passing attack would be legit. Strong is simply a baller.If not strong, you have to get Eli Harold. Dude was a 5 star recruit coming out of HS. He has been productive, and disruptive over the past few years. Very young, and a great burst. I think we could play with Vic as a right side LEO and Harold as a left side LEO, replacing the LDE or SLB on passing downs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest King Jigsaw Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Left side LEO?The cluelessness on this board, man. It kills me sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellShropshire Posted May 1, 2015 Author Share Posted May 1, 2015 Left side LEO?The cluelessness on this board, man. It kills me sometimes.I know that it hasn't been around, and that there is only 1. I'm not a dumbazz. On passing downs though having beasley on the right side, and harold on the left, gives us 2 speed rushers that can stand up, or put the hand in the dirt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Hour 4 Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 It was a mistake..... But I love the idea of double dipping for rushers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Kent™ Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 I don't agree that we have to get Strong, but i'll say he is very very underrated in my opinion. While i do not want a WR or TE at 42, i would be cool with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellShropshire Posted May 1, 2015 Author Share Posted May 1, 2015 (edited) It was a mistake..... But I love the idea of double dipping for rushersIt wasn't a mistake, but a misunderstanding. I understand there is solely 1 LEO position, but on passing downs, having 2 speed rushers who can play up or down on the outsides would be huge. Edited May 1, 2015 by DarrellShropshire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrains9 Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 I am actually not a Strong fan but it would be pretty good value there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOR Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 So many good players left. Soooo many. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taydumz Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 landon collins! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingMuLahhh Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Landon Collins or Strong and I'm good! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtybird#11 Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 I wouldn't mind. Strong is a huge WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDaveG Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Pairing this guy with Julio for the future would be huge. Those 2 on the outside, and Roddy and Hester playing inside. That passing attack would be legit. Strong is simply a baller.We're not running 4 wide. We'll draft a WR, but we hardly need one in the 2nd.I'm not opposed to the move. I'm just saying what you describe doesn't fit the scheme we're running. It fits Tampa Bay's new offense, but not ours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconidae Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Having picked up the edge rusher they needed in round one, they can take pretty much anybody they want in the rest of the draft.They can take the best guard, best LB, best TE, best RB, best edge rusher left, best WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCity Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 landon collins!I don't see a need to drafting a prototypical box safety when we've already got Moore & Kemal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Kent™ Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Having picked up the edge rusher they needed in round one, they can take pretty much anybody they want in the rest of the draft.They can take the best guard, best LB, best TE, best RB, best edge rusher left, best WR.Exactly. And based on value, Jaelen Strong or Tj Clemmings could be the best available player by the time it gets to us. I highly doubt Strong makes it to us though. I'd be very very very surprised. He's going to be good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vel Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Been telling yall this pick #42 is the one to watch. Nobody has a clue WHAT we're going to do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconidae Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Been telling yall this pick #42 is the one to watch. Nobody has a clue WHAT we're going to doThink it's offense, they've put a lot of draft and FA capital into the D last couple of years, Roddy is getting old, they need a RB to pair with Freeman, I'd like to see another Oline piece, Williams and Toilolo could make a killer TE combo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vel Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Think it's offense, they've put a lot of draft and FA capital into the D last couple of years, Roddy is getting old, they need a RB to pair with Freeman, I'd like to see another Oline piece, Williams and Toilolo could make a killer TE combo.If Collins or Kendricks are there at #42, do you still go offense? I just don't know. I'm with you though, that we can take absolutely anything. I was talking to KOG about that. Sidenote: Toilolo would make a killer TE on the bench. That guy sucks and I have no clue what they saw in him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.U.N.n.G.U.N.2 Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 ^^lmbo...he's a lineman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monolith2001 Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Logic says we grab an OG at this spot but I could see us BPA-grabbing a LB, RB, or S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconidae Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 If Collins or Kendricks are there at #42, do you still go offense? I just don't know. I'm with you though, that we can take absolutely anything. I was talking to KOG about that. Sidenote: Toilolo would make a killer TE on the bench. That guy sucks and I have no clue what they saw in him. oh h#ll, I don't know, I think I would, the skill positions on O need some youth and, counting Beasley, they've spent 15 out of the last 18 draft picks on D, plus most of the FAs the last 2 years-time to see what you have.And Toilolo spent a lot of time helping bad Olinemen block last year, not just the game where he was the RT. He had 30 catches and a couple of TDs last year. Bump that up a little- say 35-40 catches and 3-4 TDs out of your 2nd TE is pretty good.Lots of players come on in their 3rd year, and last year was hard to judge anybody. I'd hope he went the Gonzo route and caught a 1000 balls a day over the off season. Think a lot of his routes were clogged up by a total lack of a run game last year, that he may benefit from Shanahan's system as much as anyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Maguire Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Let's trade down a few picks with so many needs and so many good players left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mashburn*Fibonacci Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Left side LEO?The cluelessness on this board, man. It kills me sometimes. what's wrong with clayborn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobeit Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 If Collins or Kendricks are there at #42, do you still go offense? I just don't know. I'm with you though, that we can take absolutely anything. I was talking to KOG about that. Sidenote: Toilolo would make a killer TE on the bench. That guy sucks and I have no clue what they saw in him. Hard to say because the players we have spent time with in the 2nd to 3rd range have all been LBers and offensive linemen. I'm actually hoping Olinemen as I see it as our biggest need right now and 3 players that we visited with should fit well in the outside zone and will be 2nd rounders. Clemmings, T.J. OT 6'5" 309 Pittsburgh Cann, A.J. OG 6'4" 311 South Carolina Fisher, Jake OT 6'6" 300 Oregon As far as LBer I really like Jake Ryan in the 4th or 5th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vel Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 oh h#ll, I don't know, I think I would, the skill positions on O need some youth and, counting Beasley, they've spent 15 out of the last 18 draft picks on D, plus most of the FAs the last 2 years-time to see what you have.And Toilolo spent a lot of time helping bad Olinemen block last year, not just the game where he was the RT. He had 30 catches and a couple of TDs last year. Bump that up a little- say 35-40 catches and 3-4 TDs out of your 2nd TE is pretty good.Lots of players come on in their 3rd year, and last year was hard to judge anybody. I'd hope he went the Gonzo route and caught a 1000 balls a day over the off season. Think a lot of his routes were clogged up by a total lack of a run game last year, that he may benefit from Shanahan's system as much as anyone.That's a lot of wishful thinking on Toilolo but I hope he's at least decent. He's not that good of a blocker and his routes are terrible because he can't bend or get low when cutting. He's just tall. Hard to say because the players we have spent time with in the 2nd to 3rd range have all been LBers and offensive linemen. I'm actually hoping Olinemen as I see it as our biggest need right now and 3 players that we visited with should fit well in the outside zone and will be 2nd rounders. Clemmings, T.J. OT 6'5" 309 PittsburghCann, A.J. OG 6'4" 311 South CarolinaFisher, Jake OT 6'6" 300 OregonAs far as LBer I really like Jake Ryan in the 4th or 5th.Yea, I like those three. Clemmings the most. That kid is raw but mean. Fisher is second just because he's versatile and could be a LG or RT I'd guess. Cann is too soft for me. He's physical, but a Blalock kind of physical. I don't like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.