JayOzOne Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I get the impression that some of the debates on TATF of late are based on the fact that we will wreck the team by not drafting this player or that one. We won't wreck the team next week; we may miss an opportunity to hit a home run, but we'll definitely score in our efforts to improve the team, no matter who we get. Well, unless our guy gets hurt and doesn't play this year.Let's all be honest and recognize that there is little chance that we won't be a better team after next week, regardless of who we select. We argue over which edge rusher we should take, but honestly, any of the top five that are likely on our board is going to be better than anybody we currently have on the squad. We debate over how soon to take a running back. Even taking Gurley with #8 would make us a better team than we have right now, even if we don't improve the defense. And we'd be better if we took Scherff or Collins, whether we took them at eight or moved back.So the real question is which player will make us better than the others? We have game film, college loyalties, and big moments to consider, but the FO will hopefully have a lot more relevant data and background info to consider. I challenge anybody to suggest that we can actually hurt the team by taking anyone other than a QB with our first round selection.Just something to consider as we get closer to Christmas morning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.