RetiredFalconFan48 Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) I've been thinking about our front 7 options on 1st, 2nd and 3rd down all day while working. Who would you send on the field for three downs (include your choice of first round pick)?1st Down: Go Big to Stop the Run2nd Down: Get to Third and Long3rd Down: Drop the QBLink to PowerPoint on DropBox: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29015067/New%20Defense.pptx Edited April 1, 2015 by BirdLegs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vel Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Jackson is in no way a pass rushing DT. Switch him and Hageman in the first. Let go of the dream of him playing any NT. That would be hilarious to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlfanstckndenver Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I just wanna know how to use that snazzy format! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcanuck Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Take Worrilow out on any passing down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetiredFalconFan48 Posted March 31, 2015 Author Share Posted March 31, 2015 I just wanna know how to use that snazzy format! I cheated... It's power point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetiredFalconFan48 Posted March 31, 2015 Author Share Posted March 31, 2015 Jackson is in no way a pass rushing DT. Switch him and Hageman in the first. Let go of the dream of him playing any NT. That would be hilarious to watI hear ya. I was thinking about Quinn's talk on versatility: DEs playing DT, DTs moving to Nose, etc... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vel Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I hear ya. I was thinking about Quinn's talk on versatility: DEs playing DT, DTs moving to Nose, etc...TJax may be the least versatile DL on the team. He's a 5T only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diesel_Bird Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Wouldn't you rather have hageman at NT on third instead of jax? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moist Words Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Maybe I'm looking at something wrong but don't you have the TE lining up on the opposite side of where he would normally line up?It looks like everything is reversed as far as Sam,Will,Leo.....Edit:Not trying to be a jerk just for clarification because there is most definitely a realistic chance I'm looking at something wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigglypuff Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 attach the ppt file Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brown bomber Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Didn't we sign Clayborn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeytonMannings Forehead Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Third and long is a sub package down so which one of the linebackers is coming off? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonDaLuvMaker Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Third and long is a sub package down so which one of the linebackers is coming off?Either take out a LB or remove the NT and move Brooks/Schofield down as a nickel DE.Does Clayborn's disability have any impact on him moving inside in nickel situations? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtybird#11 Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Draft Shaq Thomspon and let him an Durant be the LBs on 3rd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FentayeJones Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I dont see a rookie coming in playing all three downs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uga_falcons_braves Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Main problem I see is you have Beasley as your LEO & the way things have been looking lately that ain't happening. It's either gonna be Gregory or somebody who's currently on our roster. So the questions become, what does your plan b look like and do you consider Beasley and Gregory to be interchangeable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 To quote Matt Ryan: "55 is the mike. 55 is the mike." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lornoth Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I don't know what your previous versions were, but they look good right now. The only thing I might question is taking Sol off the field instead of T-Jax on 2'nd down. Any reason for that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moist Words Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Just going to edit it and leave me hanging with my previous post OP?I really like the format.Nice work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Minotaur Zebra Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Take Worrilow out on any passing downBruh, Worrilow is not a coverage LB, that's why we signed Durant and will likely take Kendricks in the 2nd. You need a thumper LB and a coverage LB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndySG Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Makes a nice change from the usual threads. Good stuff! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeytonMannings Forehead Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Either take out a LB or remove the NT and move Brooks/Schofield down as a nickel DE.Does Clayborn's disability have any impact on him moving inside in nickel situations?Yep. Gotta get all your best rushers on the field. That's a good question about Clayborn. I guess that remains to be seen. The one or two clips I have seen of him sliding inside in Tampa were in run packages and they still had him on the right side. So some combination of him, Hageman, Beasley, and Schofield. So no Soliai, no Jackson, and Babs I guess would have to rotate with Hageman and Clayborn in those packages. I still like him as a rusher.I wouldn't take Durant off the field unless he's hurt, and I keep hearing how capable Reed is in coverage so Wor is the odd man out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcanuck Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Bruh, Worrilow is not a coverage LB, that's why we signed Durant and will likely take Kendricks in the 2nd. You need a thumper LB and a coverage LB.Thats why i said take him out on passing downs..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Minotaur Zebra Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Thats why i said take him out on passing downs.....We need him for ILB Blitzes... I was there at the Chicago game this past year when he almost ended Cutler's career. Dude laid him the **** out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtldirtybird Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 im still calling this a 3-4...3 pluggers on the Dline, it doesnt work without Soliai as NT...which is the key in 3-4's, Coaches can call it what they want to be fancy, but you have 3 lineman and 2 ends rushing and setting the edge, and 2 backers cleaning up the trash...thats a 3-4 structure thats been customized. If not someone like Stephen Nicholas would be playing the strongside, and not an DE/OLB like Reed. If Reed played for the panthers he would be playing DE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.