Jump to content

I Want David Shaw As The Next Hc And Here Is Why : Link Inside


MSalmon

Recommended Posts

http://mmqb.si.com/2013/09/17/stanford-cardinal-peter-king/

I simply love his offensive philosophy. Protect the QB, run ball, and probe the defenses

Another link http://espn.go.com/blog/stanford-football/post/_/id/908/shaw-stanford-striking-a-balance

I think matt Ryan would flourish under Shaw, and his offense compliments a defense. Rests it.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a fan of stanfords offense. A lot of running and low scoring games . We need a coach who can maximize Ryan's ability

It would seem that way, unless you look at Shaw with luck at QB. Shaw does a masterful job of adjusting to his QBs talent level and ability. When luck was there he had much more freedom to air it out and the offense was more open. That said, a heavy dose of running and pass protection was still at the core of Shaws philosophy. He's a Walsh guy (played under hamza) who utilizes TEs and FBs and uses the short pass as well as establishes the run to set up play action.

Ryan would do great under him and probably take less hits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://mmqb.si.com/2...nal-peter-king/

I simply love his offensive philosophy. Protect the QB, run ball, and probe the defenses

Another link http://espn.go.com/b...iking-a-balance

I think matt Ryan would flourish under Shaw, and his offense compliments a defense. Rests it.

Thoughts?

Dude I've been pushing for David Shaw's for the last couple of months.

David Shaw needs to be the Falcons next Head Coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the Idea Salmon. But at the same time, I am not so sure about these college coaches in NFL. Very few has success

While you are right, at the same time Jim Harbaugh has had tons of success. Chip Kelly has done pretty well. It can definitely be done. I would have no problem with bringing in a college coach. Especially if he puts a premium on protecting our franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He seems to have a certain philosophy, and an identity as a coach. And he seems to have confidence in his approach and offensive systems.. All these things aree traits we ahve been lacking with Smith.

I like it. I don't know if he's my pick for the job just yet, but I surely would not be unhappy if we went the Shaw route..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Shaw but I think you might get the same conservative mindset of Smitty after a while.

The one thing I like about BCS college coaches is that they are programmed to step on teams throats.

Shaw isn't conservative.

He allowed Luck to air the ball out when he was there, while still committing to the run with Stephan Taylor during the time. It was a great blend of pass and run in their offense.

Kevin Hogan is not nearly as good as Luck, so that is why Stanford runs more now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He seems to have a certain philosophy, and an identity as a coach. And he seems to have confidence in his approach and offensive systems.. All these things aree traits we ahve been lacking with Smith.

I like it. I don't know if he's my pick for the job just yet, but I surely would not be unhappy if we went the Shaw route..

To be fair, that explains mularkey pretty well lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaw isn't conservative.

He allowed Luck to air the ball out when he was there, while still committing to the run with Stephan Taylor during the time. It was a great blend of pass and run in their offense.

Kevin Hogan is not nearly as good as Luck, so that is why Stanford runs more now.

Matt ryan aired it out when we had Turner too. We were still conservative. I'm not saying he is overly conservative like Smith has become, but he is a conservative coach. I'm talking coaching decisions. Not scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a fan of stanfords offense. A lot of running and low scoring games . We need a coach who can maximize Ryan's ability

Ryan's ability is best when coupled with a good, heavy run game. Ryan isn't an air it out all day type of guy. He's a great play action guy, who is great at short and medium passes. The play action opens up deep passes for guys like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're more patient than most around here.

I wouldnt say Im patient. More like, honest. And Id rather see a team built right than watch a team continue to **** on itself because it thinks its "one guy away" and all that. We need to completely overhaul the roster. we have some nice young pieces to build around and those pieces are versatile enough that we can take this thing whereever we wanna go with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan's ability is best when coupled with a good, heavy run game. Ryan isn't an air it out all day type of guy. He's a great play action guy, who is great at short and medium passes. The play action opens up deep passes for guys like him.

Agreed. Drew brees is the only pocket QB I can think of that has succeeded in an offense that doesn't have a true run game. The reasons Rodgers and luck succeed is because they are a threat to run and can turn nothing into something. Ryan is never going to be that guy. Thats the biggest difference no-one talks about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...