Knight of God 53,286 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 And how far did they get? Did they wear the defense down?That's a runningback complaint there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slamee101 7,143 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Trade Jackson and trade talk period is stupid when you're talking about an aging player DURING the season. What value are you going to get for Jackson at this stage. He's here, folks should get over it.That said, he does need to sacrifice some touches for the younger backs at this stage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GTFalcon25 885 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Jackson didn't have a terrible day. He had several decent runs.I still think Smith and Freeman need more carries, though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Branch 12 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Smitty ball run the names all day, who cares if he can't get shart run him run him run him!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Did Jackson?They didn't trip Ryan for a sack. They did break tackles. They did get to the line before the hole closedYou two shows that there are clueless posters on this board. Them guys didn't do no better today. H ell, the Bengals had our number. Those guys running the ball wouldn't have done no better if they were starters. I vividly remember last year that you guys were calling for Rodgers head and now you sucking him off THIS year? Yeah, you all are clueless. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Falcanuck 10,532 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 You two shows that there are clueless posters on this board. Them guys didn't do no better today. H ell, the Bengals had our number. Those guys running the ball wouldn't have done no better if they were starters. I vividly remember last year that you guys were calling for Rodgers head and now you sucking him off THIS year? Yeah, you all are clueless.I'm not clueless. You are.Who carried the ball more? Jackson. Who was more effective when they carried the ball? Jacquizz and Freeman. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 That's a runningback complaint there.They seemingly don't understand that EVERYTHING on offense starts upfront. You have to control the LOS. If you don't, I don't care who you have back there running the ball. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rollo lawson 955 Posted September 14, 2014 Author Share Posted September 14, 2014 You two shows that there are clueless posters on this board. Them guys didn't do no better today. H ell, the Bengals had our number. Those guys running the ball wouldn't have done no better if they were starters. I vividly remember last year that you guys were calling for Rodgers head and now you sucking him off THIS year? Yeah, you all are clueless.Exactly!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconsAirMiles 392 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 We should have drafted some offensive lineman this past draft instead of picking 50 linebackers that can't play, not named Shembo. But I'm sure TD would have picked some scrub from Azusa Pacific or Montana.i dont think TD has figured out you win on the lines which is why he keeps drafting LBs and DBs Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dharma Initiative 6,386 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 You two shows that there are clueless posters on this board. Them guys didn't do no better today. H ell, the Bengals had our number. Those guys running the ball wouldn't have done no better if they were starters. I vividly remember last year that you guys were calling for Rodgers head and now you sucking him off THIS year? Yeah, you all are clueless.We really have some fools on this board. Anytime Jackson had a good run (which i think happened twice) I just kept thinking about how much further the others would have gotten.He's pathetic. He's slow. He can't break tackles. He can't catch. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 I'm not clueless. You are.Who carried the ball more? Jackson. Who was more effective when they carried the ball? Jacquizz and Freeman.Why was they effective? Because the defense prepared for Jackson being the starter. They were a change of pace, so the defense wasn't really ready for them. DUDE, YOU ARE SO CLUELESS THAT IM SURPRISED YOU KNOW HOW TO GET HOME FROM WORK. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 We really have some fools on this board. Anytime Jackson had a good run (which i think happened twice) I just kept thinking about how much further the others would have gotten.He's pathetic. He's slow. He can't break tackles. He can't catch.Please stop showing your ignorance. Just like last year, you was one of the main ones who wanted Quizz gone. Now you think he's a god. If Quizz goes to a starting role again, you're going to want him gone again when he can't get 2 yards for a first. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dharma Initiative 6,386 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Please stop showing your ignorance. Just like last year, you was one of the main ones who wanted Quizz gone. Now you think he's a god. If Quizz goes to a starting role again, you're going to want him gone again when he can't get 2 yards for a first.I'll take a bad Quizz over a good Jackson at this stage in their careers Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FalconsAirMiles 392 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Trade Jackson and trade talk period is stupid when you're talking about an aging player DURING the season. What value are you going to get for Jackson at this stage. He's here, folks should get over it.That said, he does need to sacrifice some touches for the younger backs at this stage.they dont realize this isnt madden Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Falcanuck 10,532 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Why was they effective? Because the defense prepared for Jackson being the starter. They were a change of pace, so the defense wasn't really ready for them.DUDE, YOU ARE SO CLUELESS THAT IM SURPRISED YOU KNOW HOW TO GET HOME FROM WORK.hahahhahahaha learn to football bro Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 I'll take a bad Quizz over a good Jackson at this stage in their careersYou didn't last year. YOU wanted to trade or cut Quizz. But all of a sudden, NOW you'll take him. Dude, please just leave this board and go and cheer for another team. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Knight of God 53,286 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 hahahhahahaha learn to football broIsn't hockey starting up? Maybe your expertise will be better for that sport. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Falcanuck 10,532 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Isn't hockey starting up? Maybe your expertise will be better for that sport.Says the guy who thinks other RBs were more effective than Jackson because Jackson "wore the D down". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dharma Initiative 6,386 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 You didn't last year. YOU wanted to trade or cut Quizz. But all of a sudden, NOW you'll take him. Dude, please just leave this board and go and cheer for another team.I'm taking Quizz 1000 times over Jackson, I would last year too Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 I'm taking Quizz 1000 times over Jackson, I would last year tooYou do know this is the internet and previous things could be pulled back up, right? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Faithful Falcon 8,120 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Is this suppose to be a thread defending Jackson? If so, you are doing a terrible job. First of all, you dissed a bunch of player that are giving their all. Jackson does slow everything down. He's our biggest back, but also the one that runs with the least amount of authority. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dharma Initiative 6,386 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 You do know this is the internet and previous things could be pulled back up, right?Go ahead, I'm still taking Quizz over Jackson. Find anywhere that I said I wouldn't Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flying Falcon 9,264 Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Go ahead, I'm still taking Quizz over Jackson. Find anywhere that I said I wouldn'tI'll find where YOU wanted Quizz cut or traded last year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Branch 12 Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 We all saw Turner after he turned 30, He was one of best runners, but age and abuse take there toll.Same with Sjax he will not be the same as he was, time for the young guys to get play time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.