xFalconLord Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 To me this means one of two things..Our talent evaluation process is pretty bad if we cant figure out who is better between Yates and Renfree after training camp and four preseason gamesOur back end of the roster is just so bad that it didnt make sense to cut the useless 3rd quarterback because the 54th player was just that badNeither is a good sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird310 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 The grand Poo Bah TD must have something up his sleeve ........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAD597 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Guess they thought they could not hide renfree on he PS and Yates finally learned the playbook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NZFalcon Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 We usually carry 3 QB's. Carry 2 is weird for this regime Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAD597 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Heaving two capable backup QBS is a good problem to have, Yates has experience and renfree has alot of potential. So many years the falcons had no one at backup and it has cost us in the past.Having two good backup qbs is hardly a failure it is an asset. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnerdburner Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 (edited) We have always carried three qbs last year was the only year we didn't lol Edited September 1, 2014 by turnerdburner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slider Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 I think it comes down to the fact that they didn't want to lose Renfree. They obviously see something they like. So far I would agree. He's as close to Ryan like as you can get I guess and I suppose he knows the offense by now. You're only able to go as far as your backup QB can take you. Right now They feel Yates can take the team farther due to experience but for the future I think Renfree is the guy that can mimic Ryan if Ryan goes down. I wouldn't want to give that up for another guy to play special teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird310 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 IMO they should bring back the EQ rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Diesel Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Basically, it was keep Renfree on the 53 or see him signed by another team, simple as that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird310 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Basically, it was keep Renfree on the 53 or see him signed by another team, simple as that. Yep, QBs at a premium, even Matthews snatched up ...also not a bad idea to suit 3 QBs, you never know when you are one snap away from Tom Matte being your QB .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RHEC Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 By keeping 3 qbs, it leaves us with an open ps spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of God Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 By keeping 3 qbs, it leaves us with an open ps spot.which does what exactly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 08 Ryan Redman Schockley09 Ryan Redman Wilson 10 Ryan Redman Wilson11 Ryan Redman Wilson12 Ryan McCown Dom Davis13 Ryan Dom Davis ---------3 may be strange BUt 2 is stranger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 By keeping 3 qbs, it leaves us with an open ps spot.NO there is no PS slot designated for a particular positionyou can have 10 QBs or 10 WR or any mix you want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird310 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Make a rule change that makes sense, bring back EQ and let teams dress 47... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Make a rule change that makes sense, bring back EQ and let teams dress 47...OK but still they have to be from the 53 can't be from PS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird310 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 OK but still they have to be from the 53 can't be from PS Yea, I know that...the EQ was basically a " free " slot .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdz4i Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 we didn t want to put renfree on the ps, and yates is staying because he has started games. didn t think it was that hard to figure out. probably let yates go after the season and run with renfree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delaigle Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Yea, I know that...the EQ was basically a " free " slot ....OK just with the talk of carrying only 2 QBs on the 53--- I was wondering how you dress out a 3rd QB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrimitiveJN Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 I wish they only kept 2. What is the point of having 2 clipboard holders on the sideline? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird310 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 I wish they only kept 2. What is the point of having 2 clipboard holders on the sideline? Tom Matte....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonFalcon Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 May be a trade piece if a QB goes down for another team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slamee101 Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Not really. The 2 QBs is a new trend. It used to be standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RHEC Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 which does what exactly?We get to keep most of our favorites on ps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RHEC Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 NO there is no PS slot designated for a particular positionyou can have 10 QBs or 10 WR or any mix you wantWell duh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.