Jump to content

Marquis? Was He A Good Pick?

Recommended Posts



Spruill has excellent field awareness, a key component of any successful inside linebacker's game. Watch the clip from 27 seconds in to see him watching the backfield, managing to stay right near the middle of the line without getting tangled up by blockers and intercepting the running back as soon as he hits the hole, bringing him down for a minimal gain.

If you want to see how he combines that awareness with quality strength, athleticism and superb balance, you're looking for the play beginning at 1:14. There, Spruill crosses once again diagnoses the run play with startling quickness, scything through the middle of the line and knocking down a blocker expecting a defender from another direction. The running back attempts to juke, but Spruill already has a long arm on him, stays with the tackle and brings him down for a significant loss.

His explosion to the ball, instincts and sound tackling make him a nice for special teams early on, where Mike Smith is almost certainly going to love Spruill.

Really, when we're talking about how Spruill's going to find success at the next level, that awareness is the integral component. He's an above average athlete, I'd argue, with sound tackling form and the ability to withstand blocks and keep rolling. While the majority of scouting reports you'll read tend to ding Spruill for his instincts, I think he's got excellent ones. A highlight reel is obviously not the best way to show you this, because it's cherrypicking Spruill's best plays, and nothing you see here is going to stun you. Time and time again, though, you see Spruill tracking the ball, arriving and delivering a hit, something the Falcons as a defense have struggled with for a while now. There's one caveat here, which will get to in a minute.


Spruill's upside is tough to define. No one's sure if his frame can support a lot more weight, and his pretty good functional strength won't be as much of an asset in the NFL. He's a quality athlete but doesn't necessarily move side-to-side well and isn't lightning fast by any stretch of the imagination.

The biggest issue I saw when watching Spruill was the same on a fly faces when dive-bombing a spider web. When Spruill gets tangled up he finds it extremely difficult to disengage, and that will be the case more often at the NFL level. All his best plays come when he's able to catch a blocker off-guard, comes in at an angle or blows by them entirely, and again and again you see a competent blocker take him out of the play for crucial seconds at a time. It's worth noting this is the same thing Paul Worrilow was and is still being dinged for, so despite my early hunch, there's no guarantee he's going to beat Worrilow out for a role.

The very first play in this clip shows you what I mean:

Consistency is the big issue with his field awareness, as sometimes Spruill becomes a bit too eager to make a play and betrays his own instincts. When he's patient enough to diagnose the play, good things happen, but the Falcons will need to coach that eagerness out of him. His momentum sometimes carries him past the play.

Scouting Report

We turned to Troy Nunes is an Absolute Magician, SB Nation's Syracuse site, for more on Spruill. Sean Farrell was kind enough to answer our questions and share some relevant links.

Dave: What would you say are Spruill's greatest strength and greatest weakness? I know it's a dumb, obvious question, but scouting reports I've seen are all over the map on the guy.

Sean: Strength: Dependability

Spruill was a four-year starter at Syracuse who didn't miss a game in his college career. He's a reliable tackler and, on occasion, will delivering a crushing hit. I thought he got better and better as his college career progressed. In his senior year, he posted his best numbers for tackles (66.0) and tackles for loss (14.5) despite transitioning from the Big East to the ACC. He was a good leader and team captain for the Orange. As a late-round pick, Spruill provides value to the Falcons through his versatility. He played both the inside and outside linebacker positions. In the NFL, he says he is willing to play at nickel back or serve as a special teamer.

Weaknesses: Size

As productive as Spruill was in college, at 6-1 and 231 pounds, he isn't as big as the traditional NFL linebacker. Of the six outside linebackers drafted in the fifth round this year, he was last in height and second to last in weight. That's not to say these measurables are the only predictor of NFL success. GMs, scouts and coaches all have their own criteria. But, I decided to check out where Spruill stands against a larger sample size of players. I found an ESPN data set showing combine averages from 2008-2012. It's important to realize that this compares Spruill to linebackers who were high draft picks, not just fifth-rounders.

As I said before, I don't think stats and drill results provide the full picture. But these numbers suggest that Spruill may struggle with the size and quickness of the NFL.<img class="yiv7552155752" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; border: 0px; max-width: 100%; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: normal; width: 653px; margin: 5px;" />

Dave: Watching him play, I was struck by how good Spruill's instincts are and how well he seems to be able to diagnose a developing play? Is that something you've seen, and how well do you think it will translate to the next level?

Sean: Absolutely. The cliché you'll hear so often is "he has a nose for the ball" and it applies with Spruill. The combination of his closing speed and his ability to get to the ball carrier through traffic made him an explosive playmaker at Syracuse. His 41.0 career tackles for loss, good for second most in school history, illustrate this point.

The two stats I mentioned before - the 20 yard shuttle and 3-cone drill - measure lateral speed and change of direction. I was somewhat surprised that Spruill scored below the average because I thought he covered a lot of territory at Syracuse. This is where his instincts can come into play. If he can position himself well - like he did in college - then side-to-side motion isn't as relevant. By using his north-south quickness (shown through the solid 40 time) and his closing speed, Spruill can translate into a useful NFL player.

Dave: Anything interesting we should know about Spruill the person?

Sean: After high school, he played for one year at Fork Union Military School, a boarding school in Virginia. Wake-up calls were at 6:00 in the morning. He had to hang his clothes and make his bed a specific way. It paid off. As a junior in high school, his team went 0-10. He entered Fork Union two years later with no college offers. He left as a Syracuse University recruit. And the rest, as they say, is history.

Spruill projects as a special teams ace right off the back, as well as a solid backup for 3-4 inside linebacker. If he can adapt to the NFL, work within the limitations of his athleticism, gain some weight and not overpursue, however, he could eventually blossom into a solid starter for the Falcons. There is work ahead, but I hope he gets there.

This was the only head scratcher of a pick I really saw TD make. I didn't like the pick then and the more I read up on him, I don't feel any better. Sorry if this was already posted but I searched and couldn't find the whole article. Just the highlights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he could be. I've not watched much of him other than a couple of highlight videos but from what I've seen he definitely doesn't look bad. Of course those were the highlight videos, so they don't show the negative aspects.

The thing that jumped out at me whenever I first looked at those videos (which took place 1 minute after we drafted him) was that he looks like a really good blitzer when shooting gaps. He looks like a guy who will absolutely punish the QB, whether it be a sack or a hit or an untimely forced throw, whenever he finds an open gap to rush through like a missile.

With our bigger defensive line (hopefully a line that can produce more pressure too) Spruill looks like one of our more promising later round picks because of how I think is gap-invading style of play should translate well behind guys on the line who will demand double teams.

But hey, only time will tell. We can talk the new guys up or talk them down, but our talk won't determine anything. We'll just have to see this year and in future years just how well or how bad any of our picks turned out.

I'm excited though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a good pick.

It was a huge reach. We needed to take Zach Kerr and I wish we had of traded up for Aaron Murray (BUT that Mathews QB could be a gem)... I think Starr and Smallwood (both of whom were final round picks) are better. I have no idea why we traded up for him other than TD couldn't get through this draft without trading up at least once.

I give this draft an A-

My only changes:

Take Kerr / Murray instead of Spruill, and take a developmental FS, and take Brooks instead of Southward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a fan of Spruill either but we do have to keep in mind that he is a 5th rounder. Our expectations should be tempered.

I suppose my objection is more towards why did we trade up for him. Let's say a guy like Southward was available in the 5th and we traded up to get him, I would understand that because he's a workout wonder and can tackle well but I just don't see the upside. My gut tells me that Smallwood and Starr have more potential than Spruill. Of course, this is the same gut that told me Maponga would be the better player than Goodman and now I don't see that happening. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was insurance in case we get injuries at the ILBer positions because Spoon is highly injury prone and Bartu is far more suited to play outside

Smallwood and Spruill are both STers right now but I think if they showed they could start it could mean the end of Dent (preseason cut) and Spoon (let him walk)

Better to have the depth than not

I just wonder would they be willing to cut someone like Konz,Holmes,Osi,Kroy if they really like them and wanted to keep them as if they pit them on the practice squad they could get picked up.

Oh well its a good problem to have

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose my objection is more towards why did we trade up for him. Let's say a guy like Southward was available in the 5th and we traded up to get him, I would understand that because he's a workout wonder and can tackle well but I just don't see the upside. My gut tells me that Smallwood and Starr have more potential than Spruill. Of course, this is the same gut that told me Maponga would be the better player than Goodman and now I don't see that happening. lol

Spruill is supposed to be good in coverage and have good instincts something dent doesn't have and spoon while very athletic his instincts are lacking as well.

I think behind this much bigger DL any LBer will flourish. He also could be a outstanding special team player

They also just may of took the approach of let's draft 3-4-5-6 LBers and hope we hit on one plus I think Nolan's defense is more so built with size and man corners that gives him room to blitz at will inside or outside it basically makes it near impossible to game plan for as well if you have 3-4 LBers that can rush as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope he turns out well.

But I'll guarantee you the coaches didn't like him showing up 11 lbs lighter than at his proday. They probably wanted him to go from 231 to 240...and instead he showed up at 220.

he has already said they wanted him to bulk up to 235 and have him on a weight gain program
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are we supposed to know if he was a good pick or not? He hasn't played a game for us yet

Not saying he won't be the next Ray Lewis when he actually starts playing. I'm just saying based off the information I have available to me right now.........

This was the first pick, in that draft, that made me go: Who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see anything in his game to get excited about. Just can't see where he plays outside of special teams.

He is a down hill linebacker that is going to be eaten alive by NFL OLs. If we are switching going to be playing more 3-4 or 5-2 where does he play?

Seems like he was picked solely for STs. Would have rather picked someone that has some more starter potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I come on here and keep seeing people say the Falcons had a GREAT DRAFT!!

Then next thing ya see is these post that say I did not like this pick or it was just ok.

So I just have to ask was it a good draft or not?

I am starting to see why the media thinks the Atlanta fans are not all that great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...