red2play 150 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/3577/harvey-dahlProductive Last year, FAR and above most of our current linemen, could be a steal this year since he hasn't been picked up. Vet min? We should immediately, don't pass go, get him. If he's a bust, it won't cost much but he was a BEAST here in Atl. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AtlantaFanatic 5,246 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Because we signed Asamoah /thread Quote Link to post Share on other sites
atljbo 21,719 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 We have 2 solid guards ...is he healthy tho ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LouDog. 2,529 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 They were. He sprained his shoulder attempting to sign the contract Quote Link to post Share on other sites
g-dawg 43,212 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Harvey Dahl is a liability in pass protection. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Romfal 11,684 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Because this isn't 4 years ago. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DonOfThemBirds 18,938 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Asamoah was one of the best OGs in FA and he is much younger than Dahl.I also think that the Rams released Dahl after the Falcons signed Asamoah. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TheEvilDead1983 196 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I would take him for the vet minimum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Free Radical 3,459 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Because we already have two guards committed. FA tackles and centers is what we have to look at if anything.Harvey Dahl is a liability in pass protection.Which year? He's never given up more than 3 sacks in a season, and when he filled in at RT for St. Louis for a while he was literally perfect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
zekeyboy1 2,494 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Can he play center? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
red2play 150 Posted May 6, 2014 Author Share Posted May 6, 2014 He was only released because of the 4-5 mil owed. As a backup for the Vet min, it would be a STEAL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LouDog. 2,529 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I wouldnt mind him as a backup but he gets hurt way too much to be a starter anymore Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DoYouSeeWhatHappensLarry 7,402 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I dont know how productive he was given St Louis' issues in OL play. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LouDog. 2,529 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I dont know how productive he was given St Louis' issues in OL play.Actually most Rams fans loved him when he was healthy. That just didnt happen too often Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IronHead34 942 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Not saying we will get him, but I bet he is picked up right before camp. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Psychic Gibbon 46,836 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Dahl was pretty bad last season. That's why. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wjcorner 3,829 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 he played well at RT for them the year before last if I recall correctly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dominique is Manufique 638 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Because we grabbed him off a practice squad in 2008 and practice squad guys 6 years later suck now too Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mega Flare 5,544 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Because this isn't 4 years ago.[/end thread] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Atlfanstckndenver 2,466 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 (edited) I could only see this happening if he was brought in knowing he wouldn't be a starter unless all he'll breaks loose again. Edited May 6, 2014 by Atlfanstckndenver Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wesley 85 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Why haven't we picked him up? The same reason 31 other teams have passed on picking him up. In the NFL, it's about how good are you, can you stay healthy, how much money do you want and lastly, how old are you. If Dahl was a quality guard and was willing to play for league minimum, I think we or some other team would've already signed him. With that being said, once teams find out what their gonna get n the draft, I think someone will sign him to a 1 yr. vet min deal because he and his agent will realize his true value and he'll accept vet min deal as it gets closer to training camp. There would be no benefit to Harvey to go out and sign a vet min deal today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JOEinPHX 3,766 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 The great thing about this thread is that 'Harvey Dahl' could be replaced with 'Tyson Clabo' and the answers would be exactly the same.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
iDash 893 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 DAHL failed a physical, last I heard! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.