Jump to content

The Smart Thing To Do Is Draft Ot @ #6


Recommended Posts

No way dude, I'm sorry, but you are mightily fooling yourself if you think a 4-12 team has the luxury of picking the best player available...

That model of thinking only works for teams with stacked rosters like Seattle or SF.

We have pressing, absolutely undeniable needs across the OL -- Imagine if Asamoah went down, or Baker, who I hate to say is our best OL, god that is depressing.

We'd be so much worse than we were last year and TD and Smith know that Blank isn't willing to put up with nonsense like that again in 2014.

we have to pick bpa at a need. That's the way teams should draft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

You can say that about any position.

QB? lol.

I disagree. My train of thought is that if I'm building an NFL team in 2014 from the ground up, I'm getting my hands on an elite passing QB and an elite LT (assuming QB is a righty).

I believe those two positions are undeniably imperative to fill with elite guys or you need an incredible 2000 Ravens/2013 Seattle like defense to win you games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smartest thing to do is draft the best player @ 6. Think elite pass rusher and elite Otackle are pretty equal needs right now.

If you draft the elite pass rusher, Ryan's job becomes easier because he won't have to score as many points.

If you assume Sam Baker will stay healthy and effective throughout the season and that Holmes will develop into an adequate replacement, Ryan's job becomes easier because he will be able to just buzz the nurse's station whenever his sippy cup gets low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have to pick bpa at a need. That's the way teams should draft

So say Mack, Clowney, Robinson, Matthews are all gone we're supposed to draft the best FS on the board at #6?

I'm sorry man, you're wrong.

Also, using the word, "should," in the NFL is an evil no GM can afford to bet the house on...

Edited by Radiohead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way dude, I'm sorry, but you are mightily fooling yourself if you think a 4-12 team has the luxury of picking the best player available...

That model of thinking only works for teams with stacked rosters like Seattle or SF.

We have pressing, absolutely undeniable needs across the OL -- Imagine if Asamoah went down, or Baker, who I hate to say is our best OL, god that is depressing.

We'd be so much worse than we were last year and TD and Smith know that Blank isn't willing to put up with nonsense like that again in 2014.

And your mistake is thinking that there won't be a really good OT at pick 38. Don't need elite OTs so much as competent ones- Holmes and Schreader may become that, Baker may return to health, the OT at pick 38 [36?] can become one.

I'm thinking that the Falcons will pick up a veteran OT in FA after the dust settles, which give them the luxury of taking BPA @ 6.

Falcons certainly could take an OT @6, I'm not even arguing that they shouldn't, just that there's no guarantee they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OT is a need. DE is a need OLB is a need. So actually you are wrong

You didn't answer my question, if those 4 guys are gone, who are considered amongst the Top 3 at their positions are gone, we just draft OL/DL/DB at complete random assignment of whomever ranks highest on TD's board.

You don't think their is a heavier weight placed on obtaining an OT over every other position on this football team?

You're just wrong dude, accept it. Every single team weighs players and ranks them, ambivalent to their position, of course, but if you think they don't also make a ranking of importance of positions of need, you're wrong and I can almost guarantee you OT is #1 on that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And your mistake is thinking that there won't be a really good OT at pick 38. Don't need elite OTs so much as competent ones- Holmes and Schreader may become that, Baker may return to health, the OT at pick 38 [36?] can become one.

I'm thinking that the Falcons will pick up a veteran OT in FA after the dust settles, which give them the luxury of taking BPA @ 6.

Falcons certainly could take an OT @6, I'm not even arguing that they shouldn't, just that there's no guarantee they will.

I think you get #6 value with Grob or Matthews. After that if they're gone, go BPA at position of strongest need.

Edited by HASHBROWN3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting the feeling that a few of you were not tuned into the same offensive football team I was last season.

The offensive line was absolutely atrocious. There is no excuse to not address nearly every position on that line through either the draft or FA to at least provide some competition.

It was embarassing and everyone knows it.

Furthermore, teams were not afraid at all to line up across our O-line, in fact, they reveled in it because nearly every squad the opposing team lined up on the DL across from the Falcons dominated the line of scrimmage every play.

Edited by Radiohead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who WOULD like Holmes at this current point in time? Clearly someone like you who apparently wants our 100M QB maimed or killed???Be a Falcons fan, not Holmes' only fan.

a yes I say something positive about a player no one wants here and my fan hood is question, I love ppl who question others fan hood, who are you to question it?.. yes I support Holmes cuz he is a falcon, I,support every falcon player cuz they are falcons until they no longer are with the team, at that point I got nothing good or bad to say about the player just good luck, I'm all about the team not the players.

Was Ryan killed? He seems pretty alive and healthy to me right about now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't answer my question, if those 4 guys are gone, who are considered amongst the Top 3 at their positions are gone, we just draft OL/DL/DB at complete random assignment of whomever ranks highest on TD's board.

You don't think their is a heavier weight placed on obtaining an OT over every other position on this football team?

You're just wrong dude, accept it. Every single team weighs players and ranks them, ambivalent to their position, of course, but if you think they don't also make a ranking of importance of positions of need, you're wrong and I can almost guarantee you OT is #1 on that list.

OT could be the number 1 priority on this team in the draft. Or it could be a pass rusher. Only the front office knows. No free safety is amongst the top 6 players available. So your orginial reply to me holds no merit. TD probably has Sammy Watkins above all FS. I wouldn't want Sammy at 6. If by some miracle Clowney and Robinson fall to 6 I am willing to bet anything TD picks Clowney.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I like Mack, I have to admit that OT is the way to go in the first.

Baker is not reliable.

Holmes may never develop into a starter.

Carimi and Schraeder are strictly RT material.

After the first round, there are no prospects that can confidently be considered LT starters.

We need a better pass rush, but we have 3-4 OLB's on the roster: Mass and Maponga.

The stouter DL will tie up blockers and allow the LB's to make plays behind the line.

There is a decent chance that players like Attaochu and Ford will drop to the #38 pick.

Late free agency may provide excellent pass rushers at a reasonable price.

When you look at the probabilities of filling positions, you come to the conclusion that our best path is to draft out future LT at #6.

Man I don't no bro I think Antonio Richardson is pretty darn good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a yes I say something positive about a player no one wants here and my fan hood is question, I love ppl who question others fan hood, who are you to question it?.. yes I support Holmes cuz he is a falcon, I,support every falcon player cuz they are falcons until they no longer are with the team, at that point I got nothing good or bad to say about the player just good luck, I'm all about the team not the players.

Was Ryan killed? He seems pretty alive and healthy to me right about now.

Give me a break man.

Ryan got annihilated out there week in and week out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting the feeling that a few of you were not tuned into the same offensive football team I was last season.

The offensive line was absolutely atrocious. There is no excuse to not address nearly every position on that line through either the draft or FA to at least provide some competition.

It was embarassing and everyone knows it.

And I get the impression you have no idea how much difference a solid RG is going to make. Give Ryan a pocket and the tackles are much easier to deal with- RB/FB/TE can help with a tackle, not nearly as much with the interior positions.

The Oline is much better right now than it was at any time last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to remember AB ain't playing around with his desire to fix these trenches. It's first order of biz with TD and Asamoah is only the first move on Oline.

the trenches mean offensive AND defensive line. Not just offensive line. TD could pick Clowney at 6 and who would be mad at that
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OT could be the number 1 priority on this team in the draft. Or it could be a pass rusher. Only the front office knows. No free safety is amongst the top 6 players available. So your orginial reply to me holds no merit. TD probably has Sammy Watkins above all FS. I wouldn't want Sammy at 6. If by some miracle Clowney and Robinson fall to 6 I am willing to bet anything TD picks Clowney.

All I was trying to do was to illustrate that you dont draft BPA. No one does.

You rank players on a board, then you rank positions.

We have dire needs on the OL and OT is #1 in need for the position board.

Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the trenches mean offensive AND defensive line. Not just offensive line. TD could pick Clowney at 6 and who would be mad at that

Arthur Blank would be!

He just spent over $100 Million on MATT RYAN.

You think AB is going to stand to watch his second 100 million dollar QB take another beating like he did last year so that TD can take a complete and total risk on a guy who plays when he wants to...

You're friggin nuts bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I get the impression you have no idea how much difference a solid RG is going to make. Give Ryan a pocket and the tackles are much easier to deal with- RB/FB/TE can help with a tackle, not nearly as much with the interior positions.

The Oline is much better right now than it was at any time last year.

Oh my god, by adding one Guard this O-line is much better than last year?!

God man, you guys do not understand how an offensive line works, clearly.

It is about cohesion of talent.

Not only was there a huge gap of talent, but there was no cohesion at all.

-- At times, it felt like 3/5 guys had no idea what the **** they were trying to do out there.

Plugging in 1, hopefully, solid OG is not going to fix that. You need to bring in a wealth of talent and have them play it out in training camp and gel together as a squad so that they know WTF they are trying to do!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me a break man.

Ryan got annihilated out there week in and week out....

that wasn't directed towards you, you've made valid points in your arguments, that was more towards someone questioning my fan hood,

Yea Ryan got sacked more than ever in his career, he also lost 2 of his weapons from the start. And was playing behind a very similar line that he has played behind his whole career, I agree we need to upgrade the Oline I still just don't believe it'll be with the 1st pick, we are more likely targeting a true RT in the 2nd-3rd Rou ds as opposed to a LT(Matthews) who is better suited for LT(won't play that here) Robinson(who is a project) that's who u want protecting Ryan another project? People need to understand the LT spot is going to go to Baker or Holmes. I just personally think it'll be Holmes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I was trying to do was to illustrate that you dont draft BPA. No one does.

You rank players on a board, then you rank positions.

We have dire needs on the OL and OT is #1 in need for the position board.

Period.

BPA at a POSITION OF NEED. And unless you are in the front office you dont know what TD has as the number 1 need for the Falcons. He could have the pass rush as his number 1 need. And let's say OT was the number 1 need. If Robinson is gone and it's between Jake Matthews and Jadeveon Clowney you go with BPA since both players play at a position of need. You won't find many people to say Jake is better than Clowney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...