Mike Kenn Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 What if Rob, Matthews, Mack and Clowney are all off the board and Watkins is there ? What do you do ? Pass on him for Barr ?Id take Lewan or Barr if there were no trade suitors. If Watkins is there I hear the Lions are interested in him. Id give Detroit a call. If I was forced to pick I'd go Lewan or Barr. It depends on whether you like Holmes/Carimi at RT or Biermann/Mass/Etc. at OLB. Regardless those are our 2 biggest needs in my eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulioisCoolio Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 I agree trade down best scenario there, but never any guarantees. I was just throwing out a hypothetical ......I would honestly consider DT Louis Nix if no trade down is presented. Yes, we have a true nose now, but we need two. If Solali were to miss any time we'd be screwed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Kenn Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 I would honestly consider DT Louis Nix if no trade down is presented. Yes, we have a true nose now, but we need two. If Solali were to miss any time we'd be screwed.We dont need to spend this 6th pick on depth. Plenty of needs to fulfill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebird310 Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 I would honestly consider DT Louis Nix if no trade down is presented. Yes, we have a true nose now, but we need two. If Solali were to miss any time we'd be screwed. I really like Nix but I'm worried about his knees....we can not afford another Jerry ...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M3T3 Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 That is the problem with this board, everyone thinks their opinions/ideas are written in stone LOL. If for some strange reason SW was there at #6, you don't think TD would consider him LOL ? I see what you're saying, I just don't think it's that much of a bad idea no more depending on the rest of FA & solidifying a couple pass rushers in the draft. I've actually been thinking trade down for ha ha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulioisCoolio Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 We dont need to spend this 6th pick on depth. Plenty of needs to fulfillNot a single Seattle Seahawk defensive lineman played more than 57% of their snaps last year. Depth on the DL is VERY important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOR Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 People keep saying "if a trade down isn't possible"Does that even happen or is it a myth created to support someones opinion? I can't see a scenario where NO ONE wanted to move up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mid-Nite-Toker Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 (edited) I'd take Watkins at #6 or hope Det. will be as desperate as ATL in 2010 to move from 10 to #6.Funny that some don't realize how the lines got stabilized today. Tice/BCox/new OLB coach are gonna have to coach up someplayers...Hawley/Holmes/Mass/Maponga/Goodman/draftees. Falcons can get an OT later and unless Mack/Clowney is there...Watkins.I'd take(deal) Watkins over Robinson/Matthews if all 3 were there at #6. If Watkins is BPA a #6...its still a good situation for ATL. Edited March 12, 2014 by Mid-Nite-Toker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Kenn Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Not a single Seattle Seahawk defensive lineman played more than 57% of their snaps last year. Depth on the DL is VERY important.Obviousy important, but 6th overall pick cant be depth with the holes we have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayrockthabarber Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 I would honestly consider DT Louis Nix if no trade down is presented. Yes, we have a true nose now, but we need two. If Solali were to miss any time we'd be screwed.Not true just move back to a 4-3 with Osi, Babs, Jackson and Clowney :-D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardyfalcon Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Trade down and take Barr. The Lions would give their 2nd to move up I feel.Barr's stock has fallen so much because he's terrible against the run. No thanks. I'd take Watkins all day if he's thr best player available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mid-Nite-Toker Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 No...just no. We already have the best receivers in the division. Watkins is third on our depth chart the moment he is drafted. Dayum near any other position nets a day 1 starter. .W/O TG, 3rd on our depth chart is a starter(receiver). Who did TG block anyway? Folks are ignoring the worse case scenarios withJJ/RW...injury prone/age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Kenn Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Barr's stock has fallen so much because he's terrible against the run. No thanks. I'd take Watkins all day if he's thr best player available.And Mack is better? Watch his game against Baylor and tell me whos bette against the run Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geaux_Falcons Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 People keep saying "if a trade down isn't possible"Does that even happen or is it a myth created to support someones opinion? I can't see a scenario where NO ONE wanted to move upSo you're going to take way lesser value just to move down? You have to take into consideration that this is a very deep draft. Sammy Watkins is about the only person anybody would consider trading up that everyone on here is opposed to taking, so a team would have to view him as either the missing piece or consider themselves not to far off. If we pass on him, the Bucs are going to take him. So now who would really want to move past the Bucs for Watkins? Carolina and Baltimore are about the only two teams I could see giving up picks just to get Watkins and Carolina probably wouldn't just because they need o line help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.