Jump to content

Will Sviteck?


bigjmw84
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think he would be a good guy to bring back. I honestly can't believe we let him go in the first place. He filled in well for a 2 or 3 game stretch in NE. He played LT out of necessity due to Baker being so injury prone, but didn't get much of a chance at RT with Clabos new contract and good durability. We also had Mike Johnson and Holmes we had hope for. I'm pretty sure he would be a serious upgrade at RT without having to pay much. That would give us more flexibility to grab more vet linemen (Joseph/Schwartz/DeLaPuente). We could go Ealy-Donald-D.Jones-Moses-Lyerla-Copeland-S.Long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever he replaced Baker he played like he was worthy of PT. on a scale from 1-10 our RT play was in the 3-4 range. Sviteck would give us a solid 6. At this point we need a lineman who knows what to freaking do in multiple situations. Our current line plays like they have alsheimer's disease

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this guy would be a last resort type move. Say for instance we picked up a few big $ free agents say DE/DT. Then during the draft things didn't fall like we thought they would. We end up taking another player on D at #6. Then we go RG in round 2. Then I think you would look to someone like Svitek to bring in a solidify the right tackle spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never supported letting Svitek go to start with. He was worth keeping... as this season proved! and then some!!! rolleyes.gif

I could support bringing him back on a reasonable contract.

Also support getting Geoff Schwartz from KC, Anthony Collins from Cinci, and there are a couple other FA OL I could support getting here immediately!

And yes, you CAN replace all five OL in one off-season successfully, or at least four of them!! For the poster in another thread that said you can't...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were to get Schwartz(G), Collins(RT) in FA, I would still grab Sviteck for when Baker eventually goes down again

LT:Baker/Sviteck

LG:Blalock

OC:Hawley/Konz

RG:Schwartz/Draft

RT:Collins/Holmes

Line up if roster if Baker goes down:

LT:Collins/Holmes

LG:Blalock/Gunn

OC:Hawley/Konz

RG:Schwarts/Draft

RT:Sviteck/Draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were to get Schwartz(G), Collins(RT) in FA, I would still grab Sviteck for when Baker eventually goes down again

LT:Baker/Sviteck

LG:Blalock

OC:Hawley/Konz

RG:Schwartz/Draft

RT:Collins/Holmes

Line up if roster if Baker goes down:

LT:Collins/Holmes

LG:Blalock/Gunn

OC:Hawley/Konz

RG:Schwarts/Draft

RT:Sviteck/Draft

You're replacing too much. If we got Svitek, it would be instead of Collins, and then we wouldn't draft an OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...