SaintRay Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 http://www.grayflannelsuit.net/blog/the-10-longest-active-super-bowl-championship-droughts-in-nfl-history#1 – Arizona Cardinals (65 seasons)#2 – Detroit Lions (55 seasons)#3 – Philadelphia Eagles (52 seasons)#4 – Tennessee Titans (51 seasons)#5 – San Diego Chargers (49 seasons)#6 – Atlanta Falcons and Buffalo Bills (47 seasons)#7 – Cincinnati Bengals and Cleveland Browns (45 seasons)#8 - New York Jets (44 seasons)#9 – Kansas City Chiefs and Minnesota Vikings (43 seasons)#10 – Miami Dolphins (39 seasons) 625 years between them..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shredman Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 not a good list to be onguess my comparison of 2012 Falcons to the Air Coreal Chargers has some merit huh.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethos Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Gotta suck to be a Bills fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Mo Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 I remember the Bills lost 4 superbowls in a row...bad for their fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Bird is Da Word Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 I remember the Bills lost 4 superbowls in a row...bad for their fansI would cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Mo Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) I would cry.they lost to the Giants on Scott Norwood's missed kicked for the win, and the rest of the three were blowouts.if they had one at-least 2/4 of those Superbowls, that team would've gone down as one of the best in history. but they are losers, so no-one cares. feels bad.Giants-20 Bills-19Redskins-37- Bills-24Cowboys-52 Bills-17Cowboys-30 Bills-13 Edited January 27, 2013 by #1WilliamMooreFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRay Posted January 27, 2013 Author Share Posted January 27, 2013 For all the attention the Eagles get, it's almost criminal they haven't won squat in 52 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meezy0236 Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Out of all those teams mentioned The Falcons are on the super highway to the Lombardi trophy. Juat a matter of time now...Or we could be one of those shytty teams that suck right now living on the past 1 SB they won god knows when!There are baseball team out there that haven't made the playoffs in decades or won the WS in over a century.WFW is very happy happy happy were the Falcons are right now! Yep only three more years to catch the colts! If that doesn't work then only 9 more for the Broncos! JS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_L Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Out of all those teams mentioned The Falcons are on the super highway to the Lombardi trophy. Juat a matter of time now...Or we could be one of those shytty teams that suck right now living on the past 1 SB they won god knows when!There are baseball team out there that haven't made the playoffs in decades or won the WS in over a century.WFW is very happy happy happy were the Falcons are right now! Right now only the 9ers and Ravens are on that highway. Next season, every team is on that highway! Yall have been on that highway for 45+ years now! Guess what I'm doing WFW? Watching the Saints WIN the Super Bowl! Sure it's a couple of seasons old, but . . . a W is a W! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_L Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 saints under this regime only 4 winning seasons out of 7...WFW is looking for the consistency we have, not what the saints are doing. We know we're knocking on the door every year!So this last season is considered current regime? No head coach? Just asking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meezy0236 Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 saints under this regime only 4 winning seasons out of 7...WFW is looking for the consistency we have, not what the saints are doing. We know we're knocking on the door every year!It is amazing how you come up with the most absolute stupidest arguments a so called old man can come up with! You champion consistency, but downplays teams who have actually won something, then in the next breath your only come back "we will win one eventually" lolololol! Seriously, ok while you're hoping you'll be right while you still have breath in your lungs, some teams fans can die at least knowing their team have won a title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rave Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 http://www.grayflann...-in-nfl-history#1 – Arizona Cardinals (65 seasons)#2 – Detroit Lions (55 seasons)#3 – Philadelphia Eagles (52 seasons)#4 – Tennessee Titans (51 seasons)#5 – San Diego Chargers (49 seasons)#6 – Atlanta Falcons and Buffalo Bills (47 seasons)#7 – Cincinnati Bengals and Cleveland Browns (45 seasons)#8 - New York Jets (44 seasons)#9 – Kansas City Chiefs and Minnesota Vikings (43 seasons)#10 – Miami Dolphins (39 seasons)625 years between them.....You mean to tell me that Dallas isnt on this list? You wouldnt know that by how some talk on here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro Roq Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 So this last season is considered current regime? No head coach? Just asking...Saints had a head coach.He was suspended.There was opportunity to bring in a replacement, they even threw the name Parcells out there, THEY chose not to.It was their bed, they made it, be a big boy and sleep in it.Its hard to understand the Saints fans using not having their coach as an excuse when Indy performed at such a superior level under much dire circumstances.Why make excuses? Just accept that there is work to be done and be proud of the results if your team can get back to the level that they were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRay Posted January 28, 2013 Author Share Posted January 28, 2013 Saints had a head coach.He was suspended.There was opportunity to bring in a replacement, they even threw the name Parcells out there, THEY chose not to.It was their bed, they made it, be a big boy and sleep in it.Its hard to understand the Saints fans using not having their coach as an excuse when Indy performed at such a superior level under much dire circumstances.Why make excuses? Just accept that there is work to be done and be proud of the results if your team can get back to the level that they were.Its hard to understand you at all.So the Colts lose their HC to cancer treatment, rally as a team in the wake of the biggest tear jerker story of the year and win a few extra games. I'll admit it was a great story..The Saints fall villians in the press, lose their HC for the year, the GM for 8 games, the DC for 6 games, lose a valuable 2nd Round draft pick in the draft, live in courtroom battles all season long, etc, etc, etc...And you make your argument?GTFO with that BS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_L Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Saints had a head coach.He was suspended.There was opportunity to bring in a replacement, they even threw the name Parcells out there, THEY chose not to.It was their bed, they made it, be a big boy and sleep in it.Its hard to understand the Saints fans using not having their coach as an excuse when Indy performed at such a superior level under much dire circumstances.Why make excuses? Just accept that there is work to be done and be proud of the results if your team can get back to the level that they were.Obviously the question went right over your head. Payton was not allowed to have any contact with the team, he was effectively not there there. I did not ellude to this past season's performance due to Payton not being there. No excuses were made, you, as usual, are just fishing for something that isnt there. A poster stated "under the current regime". I asked was this past season considered under the current regime. Facts: Payton was not on the sideline. Payton was not allowed any contact with the team. Do you disagree with any of this? Can a head coach coach a team that he has no contact with? Sure the Saints had INTERIM head coaches, so technically, it's not considered the same regime. Don't know if I can dumb it down for you anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRay Posted January 28, 2013 Author Share Posted January 28, 2013 The Falcons would have relished the chance to prove how good this current regime is if that were to have had that happen to them. Of course they have the FF and don't cheat so we'll never know if we could have gone 11-5 or 106 under those circumstances...Dumbest post of the thread, maybe the year.So now you'd have us believe if the Falcons faced the sanctions the Saints faced, they'd relish the chance to prove how good they are?I've just about read it all now. Can you get a few of the existing staff of the Falcons to acknowledge what you just wrote?And you sit quietly smiling in confirmation that we all reply to your lunacy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meezy0236 Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 No doubt. While we don't cheat, if the league would let us we would love to go interim just to prove a point to saints/swampers how well our regime would've handled the minor inconvenience the saints went through.Falcons probably would go 11-5!Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born A-Ginn Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 The Falcons would have relished the chance to prove how good this current regime is if that were to have had that happen to them. Of course they have the FF and don't cheat so we'll never know if we could have gone 11-5 or 106 under those circumstances...I'd really hate to see how "bored" Julio and the gang would be without their 'HOF' coach and they were under the kind of strain the Saints were this season. I'm not backing the Saints, but you post some of the most ridiculous ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRay Posted January 28, 2013 Author Share Posted January 28, 2013 No doubt. While we don't cheat, if the league would let us we would love to go interim just to prove a point to saints/swampers how well our regime would've handled the minor inconvenience the saints went through.Falcons probably would go 11-5! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meezy0236 Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 saints had a chance to do something great in the face of adversity (even had their players back) but they failed miserably. The Falcons current regime would've handled the situation much better and the fans would have appreciated the outcome a lot more...J/SAgain BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meezy0236 Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 So you didn't have an intelligent reply to that one eh? The truth is the truth and the lack of professionalism in the saints org couldn't change 7-9...Ok, BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Oh man, you are hilarious, please go on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAINTSfan Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Its hard to understand you at all.So the Colts lose their HC to cancer treatment, rally as a team in the wake of the biggest tear jerker story of the year and win a few extra games. I'll admit it was a great story..The Saints fall villians in the press, lose their HC for the year, the GM for 8 games, the DC for 6 games, lose a valuable 2nd Round draft pick in the draft, live in courtroom battles all season long, etc, etc, etc...And you make your argument?GTFO with that BS.excellent post bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meezy0236 Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 In the last 7 seasons so what if the saints had two 7-9 seasons and one 8-8 season...a lot of teams aren't consistent in the NFL...Umm hmm, go on LOLOLOLOLOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAINTSfan Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 In the last 7 seasons so what if the saints had two 7-9 seasons and one 8-8 season...a lot of teams aren't consistent in the NFL...We understand bro 1-4 is consistency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRay Posted January 28, 2013 Author Share Posted January 28, 2013 saints had a chance to do something great in the face of adversity (even had their players back) but they failed miserably. The Falcons current regime would've handled the situation much better and the fans would have appreciated the outcome a lot more...J/SThe 10 Warning Signs of Dementia"Everyone should know the warning signs of dementia and the importance of seeking help sooner than later," Marcell emphasizes. The 10 signs are as follows:recent memory loss that affects job skillsdifficulty performing familiar tasksproblems with languagedisorientation of time and placepoor or decreased judgmentproblems with abstract thinkingmisplacing thingschanges in mood or behaviorchanges in personalityloss of initiative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts