McMVP Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Discuss... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rave Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 LMAO! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV.2000 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I HAVE NOT WATCHED THE NFL NETWORK TODAY. HE LOOKS FAMILAR,WHO IS HE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMVP Posted January 16, 2013 Author Share Posted January 16, 2013 I HAVE NOT WATCHED THE NFL NETWORK TODAY. HE LOOKS FAMILAR,WHO IS HE?Gus BradleyNot official yet...just saw this pic and thought it was funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV.2000 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Gus BradleyNot official yet...just saw this pic and thought it was funnyI DON'T THINK I KNOW MUCH ABOUT GUS. BUT ISAY, GIVE THE GUY A CHANCE. PHILLY NEEDSNEW DIRECTION, A NEW FOCUS. I LIKED ANDYREID, BUT IT WAS CLEAR, THINGS WERE SLIPPINGAWAY FROM HIM. ANDY WILL BE BETTER OFF,JUST AS THE PHILLY'S WILL. BOTH NEEDED AFRESH START. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMVP Posted January 16, 2013 Author Share Posted January 16, 2013 I DON'T THINK I KNOW MUCH ABOUT GUS. BUT ISAY, GIVE THE GUY A CHANCE. PHILLY NEEDSNEW DIRECTION, A NEW FOCUS. I LIKED ANDYREID, BUT IT WAS CLEAR, THINGS WERE SLIPPINGAWAY FROM HIM. ANDY WILL BE BETTER OFF,JUST AS THE PHILLY'S WILL. BOTH NEEDED AFRESH START.Gus is currently the DC of the Seahawks...coached under Monte Kiffin as well...And I agree... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV.2000 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Gus is currently the DC of the Seahawks...coached under Monte Kiffin as well...And I agree...THE SEAHAWK "D" WAS PRETTY GOOD THIS YEAR.AND MONTE KIFFIN KNOWS WHAT HE'S DOING.THIS IS A GOOD RESUME. HE MAY WORK OUT.FIRST THING ..... TAKE CONTROL OF THAT LOCKER-ROOM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des-pool Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Welcome back McMvp...stay around Rivals for a while, the Eagles need representation, especially when we have to deal with a cowboys fan like Rave... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rave Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Welcome back McMvp...stay around Rivals for a while, the Eagles need representation, especially when we have to deal with a cowboys fan like Rave...Awwww, you'd miss me if I left. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Durrtay Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Awwww, you'd miss me if I left. Lol.Not at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bart2Ryan+beyond Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Discuss...Can you make your gif sig a bit larger please? I forgot just how good that video is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMVP Posted January 16, 2013 Author Share Posted January 16, 2013 Wait...wait....wait...Chip Kelly?!?Are you kidding me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rave Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Wait...wait....wait...Chip Kelly?!?Are you kidding me?With your offensive players that would work. On the other hand he wont help your defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb 3.0 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Discuss...That doesn't look at all like Chip Kelly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dago 3.0 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 With your offensive players that would work. On the other hand he wont help your defense.you won't really find HCs who influence both it will be his job to hire the right man at DC so he can focus on implementing his offensive philosophy which is what he was really hired to do anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rave Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 you won't really find HCs who influence both it will be his job to hire the right man at DC so he can focus on implementing his offensive philosophy which is what he was really hired to do anywayOh, I agree, but if I were an Eagles fan (yuck) I'd be excited to see what my offense will look like. With their speed on that side of the ball I think Kelly will do a good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb 3.0 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 you won't really find HCs who influence bothit will be his job to hire the right man at DC so he can focus on implementing his offensive philosophy which is what he was really hired to do anywayExactly why the Glazers made a pitch for him last offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMVP Posted January 16, 2013 Author Share Posted January 16, 2013 With your offensive players that would work. On the other hand he wont help your defense.Don't get me wrong...I love the hire! Just didn't see it coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Do Itch Big Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Lol thread took a 180 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rave Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Don't get me wrong...I love the hire! Just didn't see it comingKelly + McCoy + Jackson + Vick = Scary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bubba Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Finally a HC that will know how to use the Eagles offensive weapons and get the most out of them.Eagles offense will be scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMVP Posted January 18, 2013 Author Share Posted January 18, 2013 Kelly + McCoy + Jackson + Vick = ScaryIn his coaching manual, Kelly writes about what he looks for in a signal-caller:"In our attitude, every sack is the quarterback’s fault. lt is not a sack if the quarterback throws the ball away. Nobody ever lost a game 0n an incomplete pass. Throw the ball away, and give us another opportunity to make a first down. lf you throw it away, it is second-and-10 for the first down. lf you take the sack, it is second-and-16 for the down. lf you can stay away from negative yardage plays, you will be successful. We base the success formula for offense on the total number of plays. Take those plays minus the dropped balls, offensive penalties, and negative yardage plays, and divide by the total number of plays. lf the answer is 80 percent or better, you win the game. The total number of good plays is what you want to consider.The job of a quarterback is simple. He has to let it happen, and not make it happen. We want to move forward. That is a concept you have to make your team understand. The cardinal sin at our place is the quarterback sack. We want the ball out of the quarterback’s hands in 1.5 seconds. That does not mean holding the ball until 2.5, waiting for someone to get open.”-----Does that sound like Vick to you?Me neither.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rave Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 In his coaching manual, Kelly writes about what he looks for in a signal-caller:"In our attitude, every sack is the quarterback's fault. lt is not a sack if the quarterback throws the ball away. Nobody ever lost a game 0n an incomplete pass. Throw the ball away, and give us another opportunity to make a first down. lf you throw it away, it is second-and-10 for the first down. lf you take the sack, it is second-and-16 for the down. lf you can stay away from negative yardage plays, you will be successful. We base the success formula for offense on the total number of plays. Take those plays minus the dropped balls, offensive penalties, and negative yardage plays, and divide by the total number of plays. lf the answer is 80 percent or better, you win the game. The total number of good plays is what you want to consider.The job of a quarterback is simple. He has to let it happen, and not make it happen. We want to move forward. That is a concept you have to make your team understand. The cardinal sin at our place is the quarterback sack. We want the ball out of the quarterback's hands in 1.5 seconds. That does not mean holding the ball until 2.5, waiting for someone to get open."-----Does that sound like Vick to you?Me neither....Wow, I like Kelly even more now, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconsd56 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 In his coaching manual, Kelly writes about what he looks for in a signal-caller:"In our attitude, every sack is the quarterback's fault. lt is not a sack if the quarterback throws the ball away. Nobody ever lost a game 0n an incomplete pass. Throw the ball away, and give us another opportunity to make a first down. lf you throw it away, it is second-and-10 for the first down. lf you take the sack, it is second-and-16 for the down. lf you can stay away from negative yardage plays, you will be successful. We base the success formula for offense on the total number of plays. Take those plays minus the dropped balls, offensive penalties, and negative yardage plays, and divide by the total number of plays. lf the answer is 80 percent or better, you win the game. The total number of good plays is what you want to consider.The job of a quarterback is simple. He has to let it happen, and not make it happen. We want to move forward. That is a concept you have to make your team understand. The cardinal sin at our place is the quarterback sack. We want the ball out of the quarterback's hands in 1.5 seconds. That does not mean holding the ball until 2.5, waiting for someone to get open."-----Does that sound like Vick to you?Me neither....So if a qb gets sacked as he is getting the snap it is his fault?Yeah makes sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMVP Posted January 18, 2013 Author Share Posted January 18, 2013 So if a qb gets sacked as he is getting the snap it is his fault?Yeah makes sense!Obviously that would be an exception to the rule.Sounds as if he puts it on his oline for 1.5 secs....if the QB doesn't deliver it to a target, throw it away, or run within that time...it's on him. I like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts