lju713 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Just finished rewatching the game for the millionith time. It is a crime that Trufant wasnt flagged. He boxed Roddy out like a PF. Ive seen Matt recognize that in plenty games and we get that call. But hey we overcame it and NFCCG here we come. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trufant Island Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Just finished rewatching the game for the millionith time. It is a crime that Trufant wasnt flagged. He boxed Roddy out like a PF. Ive seen Matt recognize that in plenty games and we get that call. But hey we overcame it and NFCCG here we come.i thought so too. Roddy woulda had to go over his back to get it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
german_bird Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Just finished rewatching the game for the millionith time. It is a crime that Trufant wasnt flagged. He boxed Roddy out like a PF. Ive seen Matt recognize that in plenty games and we get that call. But hey we overcame it and NFCCG here we come.I've only watched it once, but I don't think it's Pass interference, Trufant was in better Position and was running in front of Roddy. I don't think there's a rule against a DB slowing up if it looks like he's positioning himself to make the catch. If Roddy had run through him, it would have been Offensive PI on Roddy, which he probably should have, that would have been better than giving up the pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajhae Battle Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Matty should have never thrown it, The only reason I think it was a flag, was because Trufant actually positioned himself like a basketball rebound, if he would have lifted his arms as if to intercept it,I'd say good defensive play, but in my opinion, he actually impeded Roddy & allowed Thomas to intercept it. In the end though, Matt can't take chances like that, the momentum was changing then, & a sustained drive would have been what we needed right then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballfan Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 The real problem was not seeing the Safety comong over the top that got the pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattbob_Icepants Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I really thought that it was obvious PI. You gotta be fair though, IMO Matt had no business throwing that ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thestufford Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I lost my mind on this play. The impeding of Roddy's route and the arm bar he put up at the very end meet the entire definition of what PI is. The reason I believe it wasn't call was because the ref was behind Earl Thomas and couldn't see it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lju713 Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 Seems like Seattle has a fanbase amongst da refs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulitik Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 If it were the Packers or Pats, or pre-bounty Saints, that would have been a PI.I kind of wonder if Matt threw it so they'd call a PI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xSICKxWITHxITx Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Trufant should have at least been flagged for illegal contact. He clearly stopped didn't got for the ball while Roddy did. It was still a throw MR shouldn't have made. I don't blame him for taking the shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lju713 Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 It was alot of muggings that were missed as well as holds by SEA OL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mega Flare Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It was alot of muggings that were missed as well asholds by SEA OL.Thank you!!! I reminded me of how the Cardinals were offsides the entire game back in the 2009 playoff game! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrobinson3803 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It looked like a PI when I was 1st watching and going back an reviewing the play it still looks like PI to me. I see that he had his eyes on the ball but he wasn't making a play on the ball just boxing Roddy out. If Roddy could have gone up to get the ball Earl Thomas would have had to make a heck of a play to get the INT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faithful Falcon Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I've only watched it once, but I don't think it's Pass interference, Trufant was in better Position and was running in front of Roddy. I don't think there's a rule against a DB slowing up if it looks like he's positioning himself to make the catch. If Roddy had run through him, it would have been Offensive PI on Roddy, which he probably should have, that would have been better than giving up the pick.The problem is, the defender cannot position himself unless he is playing the ball. Trufant was not. Had Roddy run through him, it would not have been offensive pass interference, because Roddy would not have been using an illegal move to make a play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis York Morgan Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It was dirty, but man it was smart. Gotta give him credit. It was actually a good throw, had Roddy been able to keep running. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peyton Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Matt should have just never thrown that ball. Single coverage - give it a go. The help was there over top and that was never going to work, and the Falcons were never going to get that call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snafu Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It was glaringly obvious PI.The dude boxed him out w/out even making a play on the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liverpool_champions_of_europe Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 It was dirty, but man it was smart. Gotta give him credit. It was actually a good throw, had Roddy been able to keep running.This, clever clever defending if there wasn't a safety it probably would have been PI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilleniumFalcon Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 I don't know if Roddy would've reached that ball even without being impeded, it was an error in judgement by Ryan. We were running the ball real effectively and Turner picked up a 12 yard first down on that drive, I didn't understand the playcalling... reverse to Julio, toss sweep to Quizz. It would've been better to utilize the short passing game and Turner for clock purposes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butudontseeme™ Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Matt should have just never thrown that ball. Single coverage - give it a go. The help was there over top and that was never going to work, and the Falcons were never going to get that call.Yep, and if Matt threw the pass in attempt to draw attention to the contact, like some have hypothesized, he should have thrown the ball out of bounds. Regardless, I don't think Ryan saw Thomas over the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.