Jump to content

Just Some Perspective For You Negative Nancies.


falconsd56
 Share

Recommended Posts

There are scary similarities in terms of numbers on offense and defense between the Falcons and the Gmen.

2011 Eli... 4933 yards 29 tds and 16 ints sacked 28 times

2012 Ryan on pace for 4915 yards 32 tds and 19 ints sacked 32 times.

2011 Giants rushing 89.2 yards a game 17 tds scored

2012 falcons 89.2 yards a game on pace for 10

on defense

Gmen rushing 2011: 121 yards a game allowed and 15 tds

Falcons 2012:130 on pace fore 16 allowed

Passing D

2011Giants 255 a game 28 tds and 20 ints

2012 Falcons 216 a game on pace for 18 tds and 18 ints.

oh I know you are going say but the giants have a pass rush!!!!

2011 Giants 33 sacks

2012 Falcons on pace for 38 sacks.

BTW The giants got swept by the Skins, the squeaked by bad Card,Phins and Bills teams

and got OBLITERATED by the saints.

So yeah lets cut the " but championship teams do not play like _____________"

Because they obviously do.

.You know what separates us??? the falcons are 9-1 and the G-men were only 6-4.

So If you want to crap on the team for an ugly WIN you can GTFOff the bandwagon because the REST of us need more leg room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying to compare a Falcons team who only made it to the Super Bowl once many years ago and crapped itself upon arrival, to a team that has won two Super Bowls in the very near past? The cold, hard, brutal reality is this Falcon team wouldn't make a boil on the azz of the Giants team, much less get to and win two Super Bowls as its presently constituted. C'mon, man. Whatever credibility you might have is rapidly spiraling down the toilet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying to compare a Falcons team who only made it to the Super Bowl once many years ago and crapped itself upon arrival, to a team that has won two Super Bowls in the very near past? The cold, hard, brutal reality is this Falcon team wouldn't make a boil on the azz of the Giants team, much less get to and win two Super Bowls as its presently constituted. C'mon, man. Whatever credibility you might have is rapidly spiraling down the toilet.

9-1 crybaby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying to compare a Falcons team who only made it to the Super Bowl once many years ago and crapped itself upon arrival, to a team that has won two Super Bowls in the very near past? The cold, hard, brutal reality is this Falcon team wouldn't make a boil on the azz of the Giants team, much less get to and win two Super Bowls as its presently constituted. C'mon, man. Whatever credibility you might have is rapidly spiraling down the toilet.

Worst. Fan. Ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying to compare a Falcons team who only made it to the Super Bowl once many years ago and crapped itself upon arrival, to a team that has won two Super Bowls in the very near past? The cold, hard, brutal reality is this Falcon team wouldn't make a boil on the azz of the Giants team, much less get to and win two Super Bowls as its presently constituted. C'mon, man. Whatever credibility you might have is rapidly spiraling down the toilet.

Guy who has no credibility talks about credibility LMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying to compare a Falcons team who only made it to the Super Bowl once many years ago and crapped itself upon arrival, to a team that has won two Super Bowls in the very near past? The cold, hard, brutal reality is this Falcon team wouldn't make a boil on the azz of the Giants team, much less get to and win two Super Bowls as its presently constituted. C'mon, man. Whatever credibility you might have is rapidly spiraling down the toilet.

So you have NOTHING to refute the actual statistical argument then?

Just conjecture and doom and gloom.

So the giants get swept by the SKINS..............who won FIVE games in 2011 and some how the falcons are not a boil on the azz??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying to compare a Falcons team who only made it to the Super Bowl once many years ago and crapped itself upon arrival, to a team that has won two Super Bowls in the very near past? The cold, hard, brutal reality is this Falcon team wouldn't make a boil on the azz of the Giants team, much less get to and win two Super Bowls as its presently constituted. C'mon, man. Whatever credibility you might have is rapidly spiraling down the toilet.

How many players from that era are on the team now? Who was the owner then? Who was in the front office? Any credibility you HAD is long gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trying to compare a Falcons team who only made it to the Super Bowl once many years ago and crapped itself upon arrival, to a team that has won two Super Bowls in the very near past? The cold, hard, brutal reality is this Falcon team wouldn't make a boil on the azz of the Giants team, much less get to and win two Super Bowls as its presently constituted. C'mon, man. Whatever credibility you might have is rapidly spiraling down the toilet.

Like you know anything about credibility to begin with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you have NOTHING to refute the actual statistical argument then?

Just conjecture and doom and gloom.

So the giants get swept by the SKINS..............who won FIVE games in 2011 and some how the falcons are not a boil on the azz??

Oh, sorry, you wanted some statistical comparison between the two teams?? My bad. Here you go:

Giants = Three Super Bowl wins

Falcons = Zero Super Bowl wins

Regular season significance as far as won-loss records? None. Nada. Zero. It's all about getting to the play-offs and winning the Super Bowl. The Falcons get to the play-offs and get blown out in the first round as though just getting there is plenty good enough. Not going to be any different this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry, you wanted some statistical comparison between the two teams?? My bad. Here you go:

Giants = Three Super Bowl wins

Falcons = Zero Super Bowl wins

Regular season significance as far as won-loss records? None. Nada. Zero. It's all about getting to the play-offs and winning the Super Bowl. The Falcons get to the play-offs and get blown out in the first round as though just getting there is plenty good enough. Not going to be any different this year.

You are wrong.

The Giants have 4 Super Bowl wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry, you wanted some statistical comparison between the two teams?? My bad. Here you go:

Giants = Three Super Bowl wins

Falcons = Zero Super Bowl wins

Regular season significance as far as won-loss records? None. Nada. Zero. It's all about getting to the play-offs and winning the Super Bowl. The Falcons get to the play-offs and get blown out in the first round as though just getting there is plenty good enough. Not going to be any different this year.

And they say PMS is a myth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry, you wanted some statistical comparison between the two teams?? My bad. Here you go:

Giants = Three Super Bowl wins

Falcons = Zero Super Bowl wins

Regular season significance as far as won-loss records? None. Nada. Zero. It's all about getting to the play-offs and winning the Super Bowl. The Falcons get to the play-offs and get blown out in the first round as though just getting there is plenty good enough. Not going to be any different this year.

And when it is different I do not expect your punk *** to come on this site and piggy back on the team's success. You have laid your bed now ******* lie in it. We won't forget what you've said so don't spew one more positive thing about this team from your mouth chump. You have lost that right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry, you wanted some statistical comparison between the two teams?? My bad. Here you go:

Giants = Three Super Bowl wins

Falcons = Zero Super Bowl wins

Regular season significance as far as won-loss records? None. Nada. Zero. It's all about getting to the play-offs and winning the Super Bowl. The Falcons get to the play-offs and get blown out in the first round as though just getting there is plenty good enough. Not going to be any different this year.

Very telling of where your loyalty lies. Spin your doom and gloom any way you want, call others all your cute little names you want but that shows what you're about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you go back to playing reach-around with your fudge packing buddies JBourne, Wlegget, JuliotheFoolio, etc. You're getting all emo from withdrawal.

Funny thing is playing reach-around still means we're getting more than you are. You really got to work on that man. Too funny bagging on you now.

Edited by JBourneMurkedU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...